Systematic review

Warning: Undefined array key "S1" in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Systematic review.php on line 2
Systematic review

LE WE PMID CA

Systematic review

8309

Systematischer Review

Bayesian statistics

Cochrane foundation

Data base (Medicine Biology Pharmacology)

Delphi technique

Evidence based medicine

Guideline

Literature searching

Meta analysis

Ontology

Publication issues

Research ethics

Statistics and trial design

Systematic review

Text mining

2010 1	Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. [20642853] Implement Sci 5(-): 56 (2010)
2006 2	Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews. [16673653] Rev Port Cardiol 25(2): 233-46 (2006)
2009 3	Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies. [19935980] Pain Physician 12(6): 929-63 (2009)
2010 4	Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology. [20656933] Blood 116(17): 3140-6 (2010)
2011 5	Establishing a minimum dataset for prospective registration of systematic reviews: an international consultation. [22110625] PLoS One 6(11): e27319 (2011)
2011 6	From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature. [22110690] PLoS One 6(11): e27611 (2011)
2010 7	Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process. [20339557] PLoS One 5(3): e9810 (2010)
2010 8	Updating systematic reviews: an international survey. [20376338] PLoS One 5(4): e9914 (2010)
2007 9	External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). [18159233] PLoS One 2(12): e1350 (2007)
2010 10	Register systematic reviews. [20479061] CMAJ 182(8): 805 (2010)
2010 11	Registering systematic reviews. [19620270] CMAJ 182(1): 13-4 (2010)
2003 12	The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. [14670218] Health Technol Assess 7(41): 1-90 (2003)
2010 13	Writing a systematic review. [20593139] Singapore Med J 51(5): 362-6 (2010)
2002 14	Quality of systematic reviews of economic evaluations in health care. [12038919] JAMA 287(21): 2809-12 (2002)
2002 15	Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned. [12038926] JAMA 287(21): 2831-4 (2002)
2011 16	Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation. [21719182] Rev Esp Cardiol 64(8): 688-96 (2011)
2002 17	Applying the results of quantitative systematic reviews to clinical practice. [11812702] Anesth Analg 94(2): 372-7 (2002)
2009 18	Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case. [19934873] Anesthesiology 111(6): 1279-89 (2009)
2010 19	Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. [20102628] BMC Bioinformatics 11(-): 55 (2010)
2010 20	Systematic reviews, systematic error and the acquisition of clinical knowledge. [20537172] BMC Med Res Methodol 10(-): 53 (2010)
2006 21	Can electronic search engines optimize screening of search results in systematic reviews: an empirical study. [16504110] BMC Med Res Methodol 6(-): 7 (2006)
2011 22	Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES). [21843376] BMC Med Res Methodol 11(-): 115 (2011)
2011 23	Using qualitative synthesis to explore heterogeneity of complex interventions. [21871083] BMC Med Res Methodol 11(-): 124 (2011)
2002 24	Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. [12097142] BMC Med Res Methodol 2(-): 9 (2002)
2010 25	The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms. [20618973] BMC Med Res Methodol 10(-): 64 (2010)
2011 26	Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. [21291558] BMC Med Res Methodol 11(1): 15 (2011)
2011 27	Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials: a consensus study. [21281501] BMC Med Res Methodol 11(-): 14 (2011)
2008 28	Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. [18616818] BMC Med Res Methodol 8(-): 45 (2008)
2004 29	Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews. [15260887] BMC Med Res Methodol 4(-): 19 (2004)
2005 30	Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines. [15715916] BMC Med Res Methodol 5(1): 8 (2005)
2005 31	Effectiveness of different databases in identifying studies for systematic reviews: experience from the WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality. [15679886] BMC Med Res Methodol 5(1): 6 (2005)
2009 32	Building blocks for meta-synthesis: data integration tables for summarising, mapping, and synthesising evidence on interventions for communicating with health consumers. [19261177] BMC Med Res Methodol 9(-): 16 (2009)
2008 33	Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. [18426565] BMC Med Res Methodol 8(-): 22 (2008)
2008 34	Negative pressure wound therapy: potential publication bias caused by lack of access to unpublished study results data. [18267008] BMC Med Res Methodol 8(-): 4 (2008)
2008 35	Application of systematic review methodology to the field of nutrition. [19022948] J Nutr 138(12): 2297-306 (2008)
2009 36	Review articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses: which can be trusted? [19514644] Pol Arch Med Wewn 119(3): 148-56 (2009)
2011 37	Best practice in systematic reviews: the importance of protocols and registration. [21364968] PLoS Med 8(2): e1001009 (2011)
2011 38	Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. [21283604] PLoS Med 8(1): e1000393 (2011)
2007 39	Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. [17388659] PLoS Med 4(3): e78 (2007)
2009 40	How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? [19936223] PLoS Med 6(11): e1000141 (2009)
2011 41	Interpreting systematic reviews: are we ready to make our own conclusions? A cross-sectional study. [21450083] BMC Med 9(-): 30 (2011)
2011 42	How can we improve the interpretation of systematic reviews? [21450084] BMC Med 9(-): 31 (2011)
2003 43	Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. [14633274] BMC Med 1(-): 2 (2003)
2006 44	Systematic reviews and knowledge translation. [16917652] Bull World Health Organ 84(8): 643-51 (2006)
2007 45	Reviews should be comprehensive and non-biased. [17479818] WMJ 106(2): 53 (2007)
2005 46	Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [15966628] WMJ 104(3): 25-9 (2005)
2011 47	Methodology of systematic reviews and recommendations. [20146555] J Neurotrauma 28(8): 1335-9 (2011)
2010 48	Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review. [20187938] Trials 11(-): 20 (2010)
2011 49	Basics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for the nephrologist. [21677439] Nephron Clin Pract 119(1): c50-60; discussion c61 (2011)
2008 50	Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. [19075208] Ann Intern Med 149(12): 889-97 (2008)
2002 51	Commentary: searching for trials for systematic reviews: what difference does it make? [11914307] Int J Epidemiol 31(1): 123-4 (2002)
2002 52	Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. [11979732] Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) -(47): 1-11 (2002)
2009 53	Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. [19723669] Phys Ther 89(9): 873-80 (2009)
2010 54	Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews. [20937152] BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 10(-): 58 (2010)
2008 55	The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process? [18495019] BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 8(-): 19 (2008)
2010 56	Managing the production of a Cochrane systematic review. [20679286] J Public Health (Oxf) 32(3): 448-50 (2010)
2009 57	A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. [19039031] Biostatistics 10(1): 201-3 (2009)
2008 58	An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown. [17626226] Biostatistics 9(1): 172-86 (2008)
2009 59	A Bayesian method for the synthesis of evidence from qualitative and quantitative reports: the example of antiretroviral medication adherence. [19770121] J Health Serv Res Policy 14(4): 226-33 (2009)
2002 60	A user's guide to the chiropractic and osteopathic literature. How to read a systematic review. [17987180] Australas Chiropr Osteopathy 10(2): 87-90 (2002)
2005 61	Systematic evaluation and comparison of statistical tests for publication bias. [16276033] J Epidemiol 15(6): 235-43 (2005)
2010 62	Systematic review of observational studies. [20299808] Neuroepidemiology 34(4): 262-3 (2010)
2011 63	An introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis: A workshop report on promoting evidence based medical practice through capacity building in research synthesis. [22121424] Pan Afr Med J 8(-): 15 (2011)
2009 64	Critical appraisal of meta-analyses: an introductory guide for the practicing surgeon. [19624816] Patient Saf Surg 3(1): 16 (2009)
2010 65	MADAM - An open source meta-analysis toolbox for R and Bioconductor. [20193058] Source Code Biol Med 5(-): 3 (2010)
2007 66	The impact of review articles. [17952095] Lab Invest 87(12): 1174-85 (2007)
2010 67	A Prospective Evaluation of an Automated Classification System to Support Evidence-based Medicine and Systematic Review. [21346953] AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2010(-): 121-5 (2010)
2003 68	SysBank: a knowledge base for systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials. [14728309] AMIA Annu Symp Proc -(-): 804 (2003)

Downloaded from http://www.kidney.de - The Database of Free Medical Reviews - The Metatextbook of Medicine - Ossip Groth

All Medline data shown were primarily retrieved from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function mysql_connect() in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Systematic review.php:92 Stack trace: #0 {main} thrown in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Systematic review.php on line 92