| Warning:  Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
 Deprecated:  str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
 
  
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
 
  free 
 Warning:  Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
 
  free 
  free 
   English Wikipedia
 
 Nephropedia Template TP (
 
 Twit Text
 
 
 DeepDyve
 Pubget Overpricing
 | lüll   
 
 Boolean versus ranked querying for biomedical systematic reviews Karimi S; Pohl S; Scholer F; Cavedon L; Zobel JBMC Med Inform Decis Mak  2010[Oct]; 10 (ä): 58BACKGROUND: The process of constructing a systematic review, a document that  compiles the published evidence pertaining to a specified medical topic, is  intensely time-consuming, often taking a team of researchers over a year, with  the identification of relevant published research comprising a substantial  portion of the effort. The standard paradigm for this information-seeking task is  to use Boolean search; however, this leaves the user(s) the requirement of  examining every returned result. Further, our experience is that effective  Boolean queries for this specific task are extremely difficult to formulate and  typically require multiple iterations of refinement before being finalized.  METHODS: We explore the effectiveness of using ranked retrieval as compared to  Boolean querying for the purpose of constructing a systematic review. We conduct  a series of experiments involving ranked retrieval, using queries defined  methodologically, in an effort to understand the practicalities of incorporating  ranked retrieval into the systematic search task. RESULTS: Our results show that  ranked retrieval by itself is not viable for this search task requiring high  recall. However, we describe a refinement of the standard Boolean search process  and show that ranking within a Boolean result set can improve the overall search  performance by providing early indication of the quality of the results, thereby  speeding up the iterative query-refinement process. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of  experiments suggest that an interactive query-development process using a hybrid  ranked and Boolean retrieval system has the potential for significant  time-savings over the current search process in the systematic reviewing.|*Review Literature as Topic[MESH]|Information Storage and Retrieval/*methods[MESH]
 |