Publication issues

Warning: Undefined array key "S1" in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Publication issues.php on line 2
Publication issues

LE WE PMID CA

Publication issues

Aktuelle Fragen des med. wiss. Publikationswesens

Atherosclerosis (peripheral vessels)

CNS (Stroke BASKET)

Data base (Medicine Biology Pharmacology)

Drug development

Evidence based medicine

Genomic and genetic analysis

Guideline

Laboratory animal (BASKET)

Literature searching

Pain medicine (BASKET)

Publication issues

Regeneration of tissues and other biologic structures

Research ethics

Research funding

Statistics and trial design

Systematic review

2010 1	Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. [20110312] BMJ 340(): c181 (2010)
2006 2	Analogies between reading of medical and religious texts. [17110727] BMJ 333(7577): 1068-70 (2006)
2006 3	Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak. [16974016] BMJ 333(7568): 594-6 (2006)
2005 4	Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author. [16052023] BMJ 331(7511): 288-91 (2005)
2005 5	Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth. [16052022] BMJ 331(7511): 281-8 (2005)
2005 6	Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about relationship with reviewers and authors? [15705711] BMJ 330(7487): 364 (2005)
2003 7	The faults of expert reviews are already well known. [12896941] BMJ 327(7409): 269 (2003)
2003 8	'Author pays' publishing model: only 'bad' authors should pay. [12842972] BMJ 327(7405): 54 (2003)
2003 9	Editorial misconduct. [12791712] BMJ 326(7401): 1224-5 (2003)
2002 10	Is that it? How online articles have changed over the past five years. [12493673] BMJ 325(7378): 1475-8 (2002)
2002 11	Four futures for scientific and medical publishing. [12493672] BMJ 325(7378): 1472-5 (2002)
2002 12	Oncologist who stood up to US insurance companies lost work. [12130622] BMJ 325(7356): 167 (2002)
2002 13	Dishonest doctors should not continue to practise. [11872568] BMJ 324(7336): 547 (2002)
2000 14	A day in the life of an advertising man: review of internal documents from the UK tobacco industry's principal advertising agencies. [10926601] BMJ 321(7257): 366-71 (2000)
2000 15	"Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy. [10926602] BMJ 321(7257): 371-4 (2000)
1999 16	Having non-medical readers of papers on internet will enhance peer review. [10213751] BMJ 318(7191): 1144-5 (1999)
1999 17	Dutch system of peer review is different and effective. [10213747] BMJ 318(7191): 1143 (1999)
1998 18	Get your book published. [9857141] BMJ 317(7174): 1715-8 (1998)
1998 19	How to get a grant funded. [9848911] BMJ 317(7173): 1647-8 (1998)
1997 20	Advertisements for donepezil. Review of drug in Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin is uninformed. [9437307] BMJ 315(7122): 1625 (1997)
1997 21	Obtaining useful information from expert based sources. [9099121] BMJ 314(7085): 947-9 (1997)
1996 22	Definition of authorship may be changed. Peer reviewers should be identified at end of each published paper. [8842103] BMJ 313(7060): 821 (1996)
1996 23	Do authors know who refereed their paper? A questionnaire survey. [8916752] BMJ 313(7066): 1185 (1996)
1993 24	Prescriptions for medical research II--Is medical research well served by peer review? [8324442] BMJ 306(6893): 1672-5 (1993)
1993 25	Prescriptions for medical research. I--Management within the Medical Research Council. [8324441] BMJ 306(6893): 1668-72 (1993)
1993 26	Dangers of review articles. [8435598] BMJ 306(6869): 66-7 (1993)
2009 27	Lecturing for industry--death by Powerpoint. [19139682] South Med J 102(2): 133-4 (2009)
1992 28	Scientific and ethical considerations in human clinical experimentation. [1523454] South Med J 85(9): 917-22 (1992)
2007 29	Judging words rather than journals or authors: a reminder that peer review continues after publication. [18089546] QJM 100(12): 799-800 (2007)
2007 30	Impact factor. [17456612] QJM 100(5): 315-6 (2007)
2005 31	Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding? [16203824] QJM 98(11): 829-36 (2005)
2002 32	Judging the judges: the role of journal editors. [12454319] QJM 95(12): 769-74 (2002)
2002 33	Conflicts of interest. [12391382] QJM 95(11): 713-5 (2002)
2003 34	Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. [12651968] QJM 96(4): 243-4 (2003)
2010 35	The long road of biopharmaceutical drug development: from inception to marketing. [19846578] QJM 103(1): 3-7 (2010)
2006 36	Conceptual biology, hypothesis discovery, and text mining: Swanson's legacy. [16584552] Biomed Digit Libr 3(): 2 (2006)
2005 37	The 'impact factor' revisited. [16324222] Biomed Digit Libr 2(): 7 (2005)
2005 38	The excitement of Google Scholar, the worry of Google Print. [15784147] Biomed Digit Libr 2(1): 2 (2005)
2004 39	A knowledgebase system to enhance scientific discovery: Telemakus. [15507158] Biomed Digit Libr 1(1): 2 (2004)
2009 40	Launching an academic research career. [19892881] Dis Model Mech 2(11-12): 526-30 (2009)
2009 41	The philosophy of scientific experimentation: a review. [20098589] Autom Exp 1(): 2 (2009)
2003 42	Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. [14725274] Croat Med J 44(6): 770-83 (2003)
2002 43	Kipling's guide to writing a scientific paper. [12035130] Croat Med J 43(3): 262-7 (2002)
2009 44	Ghostwriting: the dirty little secret of medical publishing that just got bigger. [19901975] PLoS Med 6(9): e1000156 (2009)
2009 45	Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective. [19753108] PLoS Med 6(9): e1000151 (2009)
2009 46	The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines. [19753107] PLoS Med 6(9): e1000094 (2009)
2009 47	What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature? [19192943] PLoS Med 6(2): e23 (2009)
2007 48	Ghost management: how much of the medical literature is shaped behind the scenes by the pharmaceutical industry? [17896859] PLoS Med 4(9): e286 (2007)
2007 49	Reporting of systematic reviews: better software required. [17594174] PLoS Med 4(6): e225 (2007)
2007 50	Reporting of systematic reviews: the challenge of genetic association studies. [17593896] PLoS Med 4(6): e211 (2007)
2007 51	Training of peer reviewers: validation of a 5-point rating scale. [17456001] PLoS Med 4(4): e166 (2007)
2007 52	Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. [17388685] PLoS Med 4(3): e147 (2007)
2007 53	The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality. [17411314] PLoS Med 4(1): e40 (2007)
2007 54	Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomised trials. [17227134] PLoS Med 4(1): e19 (2007)
2007 55	Does industry sponsorship undermine the integrity of nutrition research? [17214505] PLoS Med 4(1): e6 (2007)
2007 56	Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. [17214504] PLoS Med 4(1): e5 (2007)
2006 57	The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. [16749869] PLoS Med 3(6): e291 (2006)
2006 58	The impact of open access upon public health. [16719556] PLoS Med 3(5): e252 (2006)
2006 59	Unique author identification number in scientific databases: a suggestion. [16719554] PLoS Med 3(5): e249 (2006)
2006 60	Drowning or thirsting: the extremes of availability of medical information. [16563043] PLoS Med 3(3): e165 (2006)
2005 61	Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing, and editing data abnormalities. [16138788] PLoS Med 2(10): e267 (2005)
2005 62	The need for a new specialist professional research system of 'pure' medical science. [16120019] PLoS Med 2(8): e285 (2005)
2005 63	Why most published research findings are false. [16060722] PLoS Med 2(8): e124 (2005)
2005 64	Focus on the funding and production of evidence rather than its publication. [16033316] PLoS Med 2(7): e222 (2005)
2005 65	Why PLoS sponsored a roundtable of medical whistleblowers. [15913415] PLoS Med 2(7): e208 (2005)
2005 66	Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. [15916457] PLoS Med 2(5): e138 (2005)
2005 67	Why bigger is not yet better: the problems with huge datasets. [15737010] PLoS Med 2(2): e55 (2005)
2010 68	Internet-based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. [20122253] BMC Med Educ 10(): 12 (2010)
2004 69	Using email reminders to engage physicians in an Internet-based CME intervention. [15453911] BMC Med Educ 4(): 17 (2004)
2004 70	Restrictions impeding web-based courses: a survey of publishers' variation in authorising access to high quality on-line literature. [15070412] BMC Med Educ 4(): 7 (2004)
2007 71	Peer review in open access scientific journals. [20101291] Open Med 1(1): e49-51 (2007)
2002 72	Dishonesty, misconduct and fraud in clinical research: an international problem. [12235917] J Int Med Res 30(4): 357-65 (2002)
1999 73	Preparing manuscripts for submission to medical journals: the paper trail. [10538262] Eff Clin Pract 2(3): 131-7 (1999)
2006 74	Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. [16803442] Med J Aust 184(12): 621-6 (2006)
2006 75	Killing the messenger: should scientific journals be responsible for policing scientific fraud? [16803433] Med J Aust 184(12): 596-7 (2006)
2006 76	A journey of hope: lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs. [16789973] J Intern Med 260(1): 1-10 (2006)
2004 77	Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility. [15367169] J Intern Med 256(4): 271-83 (2004)
2004 78	Translation of clinical trials into clinical practice. [14871453] J Intern Med 255(3): 309-16 (2004)
2002 79	The truth in reviews. [12365473] Neth J Med 60(5): 191 (2002)
2007 80	The rapidly changing landscape of biomedical conflicts of interest. [17552087] Cleve Clin J Med 74 Suppl 2(): S3-5 (2007)
2007 81	Fraud, conflict of interest, and other enforcement issues in clinical research. [17471620] Cleve Clin J Med 74 Suppl 2(): S63-7; discussion S68-9 (2007)
2010 82	The CNEP trial: how a good trial was turned rotten. [20382896] J R Soc Med 103(4): 121-2 (2010)
2009 83	Three deadly sins: hierarchy, etiquette and conformity. [19875529] J R Soc Med 102(11): 455 (2009)
2009 84	A new world order for medical journals. [19147846] J R Soc Med 102(1): 1 (2009)
2008 85	What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? [18840867] J R Soc Med 101(10): 507-14 (2008)
2007 86	Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. [17404342] J R Soc Med 100(4): 187-90 (2007)
2007 87	Reed-Elsevier's hypocrisy in selling arms and health. [17339299] J R Soc Med 100(3): 114-5 (2007)
2007 88	Open peer review: a route to democracy. [17197678] J R Soc Med 100(1): 9 (2007)
2006 89	Peer review. Unreliable reviewers. [16893932] J R Soc Med 99(8): 385 (2006)
2006 90	Peer review. Peerless review. [16893928] J R Soc Med 99(8): 384-5 (2006)
2006 91	From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex. [16816262] J R Soc Med 99(7): 337-41 (2006)
2006 92	Doctors charged with manslaughter in the course of medical practice, 1795-2005: a literature review. [16738374] J R Soc Med 99(6): 309-14 (2006)
2006 93	Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. [16574968] J R Soc Med 99(4): 178-82 (2006)
2006 94	Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. [16508053] J R Soc Med 99(3): 141-8 (2006)
2005 95	Surviving a clinical exam: a guide for candidates. [15805564] J R Soc Med 98(4): 174-7 (2005)
2005 96	The qualities of a good teacher: how can they be acquired and sustained? [15684362] J R Soc Med 98(2): 67-9 (2005)
2003 97	Five steps to conducting a systematic review. [12612111] J R Soc Med 96(3): 118-21 (2003)
1985 98	Bias and fraud in medical research: a review. [3906120] J R Soc Med 78(11): 937-40 (1985)
1998 99	Emergence of "pseudoscience". [9839046] Can Fam Physician 44(-): 2374-5 (1998)
1996 100	What we want. Part 1: CME and review articles. [8924806] Can Fam Physician 42(-): 15-7, 23-5 (1996)
1995 101	Unpublishable research. [8520228] Can Fam Physician 41(-): 1443, 1445-7, 1459-61 (1995)
1994 102	So, you want to be an author. Publishing without perishing. [7888814] Can Fam Physician 40(-): 2048-51, 2057-61 (1994)
2007 103	Peer review. [17359618] Br J Gen Pract 57(536): 245-6 (2007)
2005 104	Electronic primary care guidelines with links to Cochrane reviews--EBM Guidelines. [15897214] Fam Pract 22(4): 465-9 (2005)
2009 105	Medical journals - What are they good for? [19521588] Aust Fam Physician 38(6): 433-7 (2009)
2009 106	The journal impact factor: how to interpret its true value and importance. [19179983] Med Sci Monit 15(2): SR1-4 (2009)
2005 107	Tobacco industry manipulation of research. [15842123] Public Health Rep 120(2): 200-8 (2005)
1997 108	Authors and authorship--reform or abolition? [9254552] Am J Public Health 87(7): 1091-2 (1997)
1993 109	Prior, duplicate, repetitive, fragmented, and redundant publication and editorial decisions. [8498610] Am J Public Health 83(6): 792-3 (1993)
1990 110	Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors. [2316756] Am J Public Health 80(4): 399-400 (1990)
2009 111	On ghost authorship and reviews: the 6th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. [19997585] Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(45): 731-2 (2009)
2009 112	Open access: unlimited Web based literature searching. [19946435] Dtsch Arztebl Int 106(43): 710-2 (2009)
2008 113	The check-up before publication: once the peer-review process has been completed, scientific texts are revised one final time by the editors to make them easier to read and to understand. [19561804] Dtsch Arztebl Int 105(51-52): 897-9 (2008)
2008 114	Poster exhibitions at national conferences: education or farce? [19633788] Dtsch Arztebl Int 105(5): 78-83 (2008)
2009 115	Subspecialty impact factors: the contribution of pediatric anesthesia and pain articles. [19095837] Anesth Analg 108(1): 105-10 (2009)
2009 116	Data fabrication and article retraction: how not to get lost in the woods. [19262370] Anesthesiology 110(5): 955-6 (2009)
2008 117	Full disclosure: not just of conflict, but also of data. [18212559] Anesthesiology 108(2): 181-2 (2008)
2000 118	The purpose of peer review. [10781303] Anesthesiology 92(5): 1495-8 (2000)
1994 119	Unresolved issues relating to peer review, industry support of research, and conflict of interest. [8141444] Anesthesiology 80(3): 491-2 (1994)
2008 120	The ethical assignment of authorship in scientific publications: issues and guidelines. [18801021] Acad Emerg Med 15(10): 963-9 (2008)
2004 121	Who wrote this paper? Basics of authorship and ethical issues. [14709433] Acad Emerg Med 11(1): 76-7 (2004)
2001 122	Research fundamentals: choosing an appropriate journal, manuscript preparation, and interactions with editors. [11483464] Acad Emerg Med 8(8): 844-50 (2001)
2001 123	Does the reference really support that assertion? The potential for citing research reports out of context. [11229951] Acad Emerg Med 8(3): 276-7 (2001)
1999 124	Research fundamentals VI: misconduct in biomedical research. [10463558] Acad Emerg Med 6(8): 840-8 (1999)
1999 125	Recent trends and controversies in industry-sponsored clinical trials. [10463557] Acad Emerg Med 6(8): 833-9 (1999)
2006 126	An evaluation of emergency medicine investigators' views on open access to medical literature. [17130592] Emerg Med J 23(12): 895-8 (2006)
2008 127	Public (open) access policy. [18754942] Epilepsia 49(8): 1295 (2008)
2004 128	Peer-reviewed publication: a view from inside. [15270753] Epilepsia 45(8): 889-94 (2004)
2001 129	Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. [11879357] Epilepsia 42(12): 1492-3 (2001)
2006 130	Call for a European guidelines institute. [16449716] Br J Psychiatry 188(): 193; author reply 193 (2006)
2005 131	Combating editorial racism. [16055835] Br J Psychiatry 187(): 188 (2005)
2005 132	Combating editorial racism. [15863753] Br J Psychiatry 186(): 447-8 (2005)
2005 133	Combating editorial racism in psychiatric publications. [15630115] Br J Psychiatry 186(): 1-3 (2005)
2000 134	Open peer review: a randomised controlled trial. [10789326] Br J Psychiatry 176(-): 47-51 (2000)
2000 135	Research ethics and forensic patients. [11190357] Can J Psychiatry 45(10): 892-8 (2000)
1986 136	Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. [16812447] J Exp Anal Behav 45(2): 127-32 (1986)
1986 137	The relationships between subject and experimenter (Editorial). [16812446] J Exp Anal Behav 45(2): 123-7 (1986)
2008 138	Conflict of interest, journal review, and publication policy. [18650804] Neuropsychopharmacology 33(13): 3023-6 (2008)
2009 139	Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench. [18797473] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 29(2): 221-3 (2009)
2010 140	Fighting publication bias: introducing the Negative Results section. [20596038] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30(7): 1263-4 (2010)
2005 141	Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism and clearly involves intention to deceive. [15729286] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25(3): 291 (2005)
2005 142	Letter of apology. Cerebral ischemia and reperfusion: the pathophysiologic concept as a basis for clinical therapy. [15729285] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25(3): 291 (2005)
2004 143	Cerebral ischemia and reperfusion: the pathophysiologic concept as a basis for clinical therapy. [15087705] J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 24(4): 351-71 (2004)
2008 144	Z factor: a new index for measuring academic research output. [18992172] Mol Pain 4(-): 53 (2008)
2008 145	Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information. [18347464] J Neuroophthalmol 28(1): 72-4 (2008)
2008 146	Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving. [18347463] J Neuroophthalmol 28(1): 69-71 (2008)
2008 147	The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue? [18347450] J Neuroophthalmol 28(1): 1-4 (2008)
2009 148	Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct. [19330396] Can J Anaesth 56(6): 408-11 (2009)
2006 149	The role of scientific journals in continuing medical education. [17142650] Can J Anaesth 53(12): 1175-9 (2006)
1997 150	The characteristics of excellent clinical teachers. [9187774] Can J Anaesth 44(6): 577-81 (1997)
2009 151	Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction: Implications for the peer-review process. [19148335] Neth Heart J 17(1): 25-9 (2009)
2006 152	You can't keep a good man (or woman) down. [16598108] J Invasive Cardiol 18(3): 109-10 (2006)
2009 153	Surgeons produce innovative ideas which are frequently lost in the labyrinth of patents. [19168370] Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(3): 480-8 (2009)
2009 154	When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. [19671627] Eur J Echocardiogr 10(6): 713-5 (2009)
2002 155	Protecting the rights of investigators in industry-supported clinical research. [12021725] J Vasc Surg 35(5): 1036-40 (2002)
2000 156	Potential problems with industry-supported clinical research. [10805903] J Vasc Surg 31(5): 1066-76 (2000)
2007 157	What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: 'all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing'? [17583174] Vasc Health Risk Manag 3(1): 39-53 (2007)
2002 158	The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias. [12445872] Cardiovasc Res 56(3): 339-46 (2002)
2002 159	Submissions, impact factor, reviewer's recommendations and geographical bias within the peer review system (1997-2002): focus on Germany. [12123756] Cardiovasc Res 55(2): 215-9 (2002)
2000 160	Where do our reviewers come from? [10727646] Cardiovasc Res 46(1): 1-13 (2000)
1997 161	World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. [9302340] Cardiovasc Res 35(1): 2-3 (1997)
2008 162	Gap in publication of comparative information on new medicines. [18294324] Br J Clin Pharmacol 65(5): 716-22 (2008)
2005 163	How to increase your funding chances: common pitfalls in medical grant applications. [16055939] Can J Clin Pharmacol 12(2): e182-5 (2005)
2002 164	Censorship of scientific publications: a bad idea. [11945057] Mol Ther 5(4): 337 (2002)
2006 165	Art of writing a scientific paper. [16850897] Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 50(1): 1-6 (2006)
2004 166	Basic medical science education must include medical informatics. [15907048] Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 48(4): 395-408 (2004)
2002 167	Good research and publication practice in biomedical science. [12500488] Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 46(2): 131-5 (2002)
2009 168	The Retrovirology Open Access experience. [20003491] Retrovirology 6(): 115 (2009)
2008 169	H-index, mentoring-index, highly-cited and highly-accessed: how to evaluate scientists? [19032780] Retrovirology 5(-): 106 (2008)
2008 170	Sometimes the impact factor outshines the H index. [18837971] Retrovirology 5(): 88 (2008)
2007 171	Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics? [17577403] Retrovirology 4(): 42 (2007)
2006 172	Beyond open access: open discourse, the next great equalizer. [17007632] Retrovirology 3(): 55 (2006)
2010 173	Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. [20181324] Health Technol Assess 14(8): iii, ix-xi, 1-193 (2010)
2008 174	Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review. [18831948] Health Technol Assess 12(32): iii, ix-x, 1-46 (2008)
2000 175	Publication and related biases. [10932019] Health Technol Assess 4(10): 1-115 (2000)
2005 176	Acta Dermato-Venereologica becomes its own publisher and moves towards open access. [16396793] Acta Derm Venereol 85(6): 482 (2005)
2007 177	Full disclosure--nothing less will do. [17632552] J Invest Dermatol 127(8): 1831-3 (2007)
2007 178	Conflicts of interest in dermatology: more than skin deep? [17632551] J Invest Dermatol 127(8): 1829-30 (2007)
2007 179	Transparency is the key to the relationship between biomedical journals and medical writers. [17363950] J Invest Dermatol 127(4): 735-7 (2007)
2006 180	The increasing importance of systematic reviews in clinical dermatology research and publication. [17041612] J Invest Dermatol 126(11): 2357-60 (2006)
2006 181	A socratic dialogue on impact factors. [16912683] J Invest Dermatol 126(9): 1923-4 (2006)
2006 182	Errors in the lab and in publications. [16702960] J Invest Dermatol 126(6): 1195-6 (2006)
2004 183	The north-south divide in health research publishing: what can smaller journals do? [15361105] Trop Med Int Health 9(9): 935-6 (2004)
2001 184	Drugs for neglected diseases: a failure of the market and a public health failure? [11703850] Trop Med Int Health 6(11): 945-51 (2001)
2009 185	Impact factor and its role in academic promotion. [19657400] Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 4(): 265-6 (2009)
1997 186	Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. [9404555] Allergy 52(11): 1050-6 (1997)
2009 187	NIH peer review reform. [19542560] Infect Immun 77(7): 3127 (2009)
2009 188	Is peer review censorship? [19223484] Infect Immun 77(4): 1273-4 (2009)
2009 189	NIH peer review reform--change we need, or lipstick on a pig? [19168745] Infect Immun 77(3): 929-32 (2009)
2006 190	A community experiment with fully open and published peer review. [16542032] Biol Direct 1(): 1 (2006)
2009 191	Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts? [19291274] J Biol 8(3): 24 (2009)
2002 192	Open access to the scientific journal literature. [12144706] J Biol 1(1): 3 (2002)
2009 193	Editor's note. 'Report from the Working Group of the Molecular Biology Society of Japan for the Investigation of Fraud in the Research Papers'. [19695022] Genes Cells 14(8): 901 (2009)
2001 194	Responsibility for truth in research. [11405932] Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1410): 849-51 (2001)
2008 195	The ups and downs of journal impact factors. [18316351] Ann Occup Hyg 52(2): 73-82 (2008)
2007 196	Historical development of the journal impact factor and its relevance for occupational health. [18212467] Ind Health 45(6): 730-42 (2007)
2004 197	Writing a research article: advice to beginners. [15150149] Int J Qual Health Care 16(3): 191-2 (2004)
2001 198	Writing for publication--a guide for new authors. [11669570] Int J Qual Health Care 13(5): 417-21 (2001)
2001 199	Guidelines on good publication practice. [11221989] Occup Environ Med 58(2): 137 (2001)
2006 200	Inaccessible novel questionnaires in published medical research: hidden methods, hidden costs. [17041128] Am J Epidemiol 164(12): 1141-4 (2006)
2003 201	On the failure to disclose sibling manuscripts. [12578796] Am J Epidemiol 157(4): 281 (2003)
2000 202	Human genome epidemiologic reviews: the beginning of something HuGE. [10625169] Am J Epidemiol 151(1): 2-3 (2000)
1999 203	Dear author--advice from a retiring editor. [10472941] Am J Epidemiol 150(5): 433-6 (1999)
1996 204	The misconduct of redundant publication. [8976632] Ann Rheum Dis 55(11): 783-5 (1996)
1992 205	From America: cookbook medicine or food for thought: practice guidelines development in the USA. [1466606] Ann Rheum Dis 51(11): 1257-8 (1992)
2004 206	One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications. [15274274] J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(5): 743-5 (2004)
1995 207	Fraudulent and redundant publication. [7593092] J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(6): 845-6 (1995)
1992 208	Research fraud. [1544944] J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(2): 173-4 (1992)
2008 209	Guidelines to the writing of case studies. [19066690] J Can Chiropr Assoc 52(4): 199-204 (2008)
2006 210	Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. [19674681] J Chiropr Med 5(3): 101-17 (2006)
2006 211	How to write a case report for publication. [19674676] J Chiropr Med 5(2): 72-82 (2006)
2009 212	Impact factor and study design: the Academic Value of Published Research (AVaRes) score. [18990264] Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(1): 71-3 (2009)
2007 213	The problem surgical colleague. [17688714] Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(5): 457-63; discussion 464-5 (2007)
2006 214	Presentation to peer-review publication. [16838409] Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(4): 427-8 (2006)
1993 215	Editorial-The Annals: the editorial process revealed. [19311435] Ann R Coll Surg Engl 75(2): 73 (1993)
1977 216	A review of malingering and hysteria in clinical practice. [337886] Ann R Coll Surg Engl 59(6): 511-3 (1977)
2001 217	Duplicate or fraudulent publications. [11764869] Can J Surg 44(6): 405-6 (2001)
1994 218	Of mice and men. Honesty and integrity in medicine. [7986141] Ann Surg 220(6): 745-50 (1994)
2002 219	Independent clinical trials: a commentary. [12088263] Tumori 88(2): 85-8 (2002)
2007 220	Not credible: a subversion of science by the pharmaceutical industry. Commentary on A global comparison regarding patient access to cancer drugs (Ann Oncol 2007; 18 Suppl 3: pp 1 75). [17761703] Ann Oncol 18(9): 1433-5; discussion 1585-7 (2007)
2003 221	Continuing medical education: a must for every medical oncologist. [14504042] Ann Oncol 14(10): 1455-9 (2003)
2003 222	European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003). [12853336] Ann Oncol 14(7): 973-1005 (2003)
1998 223	Systematic reviews of published evidence: miracles or minefields? [9739434] Ann Oncol 9(7): 703-9 (1998)
1997 224	Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information? [9496383] Ann Oncol 8(12): 1185-95 (1997)
1991 225	The process of peer-review. [1997091] Br J Cancer 63(2): 168-72 (1991)
1990 226	From receipt to publication. [2257213] Br J Cancer 62(6): 875-7 (1990)
2008 227	Barriers to the diffusion of advanced surgical techniques. [18300242] Cancer 112(8): 1646-9 (2008)
2005 228	Presentation and subsequent publication rates of phase I oncology clinical trials. [16116590] Cancer 104(7): 1497-504 (2005)
2006 229	Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process. [16537825] J Natl Cancer Inst 98(6): 374-6 (2006)
2001 230	Conference addresses potential flaws in peer review process. [11717323] J Natl Cancer Inst 93(22): 1679-80 (2001)
2008 231	Commentary: practicing on the tip of an information iceberg? Evidence of underpublication of registered clinical trials in oncology. [18794216] Oncologist 13(9): 925-9 (2008)
2008 232	Commentary: publishing cancer clinical trial results: a scientific and ethical imperative. [18794215] Oncologist 13(9): 930-2 (2008)
2008 233	One in five cancer clinical trials is published: a terrible symptom--what's the diagnosis? [18794214] Oncologist 13(9): 923-4 (2008)
2006 234	Journals should publish all 'null' results and should sparingly publish 'positive' results. [16434613] Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(1): 186 (2006)
2000 235	Publication bias is a scientific problem with adverse ethical outcomes: the case for a section for null results. [10952092] Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(8): 771-2 (2000)
2008 236	Systematic reviews - professional masochism or important process? [19074358] J Orthod 35(4): 221-2 (2008)
2007 237	Peer review: an inexact but essential part of scientific publishing. [17473026] J Am Dent Assoc 138(5): 568, 570, 572 (2007)
2007 238	You are what you cite: the role of references in scientific publishing. [17197392] J Am Dent Assoc 138(1): 12, 14 (2007)
2006 239	Plagiarism, salami, ghostwriting and other forms of flattery. [16521374] J Am Dent Assoc 137(2): 140, 142, 144 (2006)
2002 240	A well-founded trust: a seven-tier defense against scientific misconduct. [12148667] J Am Dent Assoc 133(7): 804, 806 (2002)
1999 241	Online continuing dental education. [10377644] J Am Dent Assoc 130(6): 848-54 (1999)
2001 242	The unwillingness of some researchers to share bacterial strains and reagents. [11499500] J Dent Res 80(6): 1504 (2001)
1997 243	Is it time for a new approach to authorship? [9109819] J Dent Res 76(3): 724-7 (1997)
1996 244	Trashing the dental literature--misleading the general practitioners: a point of view. [8952612] J Dent Res 75(9): 1624-6 (1996)
1994 245	A clinician's perspective. "Compounding irresponsibility: the unpalatable triad of bad science, bad refereeing, and bad journalism". [8046100] J Dent Res 73(6): 1130-2 (1994)
1990 246	Should 75% of IADR abstracts be rejected? [2384634] J Dent Res 69(8): 1544 (1990)
1990 247	A survey of the publication history of randomly selected IADR/AADR abstracts presented in 1983 and 1984. [2384621] J Dent Res 69(8): 1453-5 (1990)
2007 248	A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine. [17562003] Head Face Med 3(): 27 (2007)
2008 249	Characteristics of and trends in the late-stage biopharmaceutical pipeline. [18402515] Am J Manag Care 14(4): 226-9 (2008)
2005 250	Primum non nocere: does the current research publication system (or the lay press) harm our patients? [15849326] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171(9): 937-8 (2005)
2004 251	Mentoring: seven roles and some specifics. [15242852] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 170(2): 114-7 (2004)
2004 252	Assessing the performance of a medical journal. [15187009] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169(12): 1268-72 (2004)
2003 253	Financial disclosure of reviewers. [14555459] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(8): 1010; author reply 1010 (2003)
2003 254	Peer review and manuscript triage. [12888612] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168(3): 397; author reply 397; discussion 397-8 (2003)
2002 255	How I review an original scientific article. [12379542] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(8): 1019-23 (2002)
2002 256	Rigor of peer review and the standing of a journal. [12379538] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166(8): 1013-4 (2002)
2000 257	Reporting research, retraction of results, and responsibility. [10988078] Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162(3 Pt 1): 773-4 (2000)
2007 258	The shifting sands of research ethics and governance: effect on research in paediatrics. [17185448] Arch Dis Child 92(1): 80-1 (2007)
2006 259	Trial registration, the ICMJE statement, and paediatric journals. [16374925] Arch Dis Child 91(1): 93 (2006)
2005 260	The implications of the David Glass case for future clinical practice in the UK. [16040880] Arch Dis Child 90(8): 822-5 (2005)
2005 261	How international are leading general paediatric journals? [16040877] Arch Dis Child 90(8): 816-7 (2005)
2004 262	Copies of clinic letters to the family. [15499057] Arch Dis Child 89(11): 1032-3 (2004)
2004 263	Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. [14977717] Arch Dis Child 89(3): 286-7 (2004)
2000 264	Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published? [11087295] Arch Dis Child 83(6): 524-6 (2000)
1995 265	Presenting a scientific paper, including the pitfalls. [7574867] Arch Dis Child 73(2): 168-9 (1995)
1995 266	Reviewing scientific papers. [7618945] Arch Dis Child 72(6): 539-40 (1995)
1995 267	Some reservations about clinical guidelines. [7717747] Arch Dis Child 72(1): 70-5 (1995)
1994 268	Guidelines for ethical conduct of medical research in children. [7979513] Arch Dis Child 71(3): 282 (1994)
1990 269	Duplicate publication and related problems. [2270934] Arch Dis Child 65(12): 1289-90 (1990)
1989 270	Educating medical students about death and dying. [2658857] Arch Dis Child 64(5): 750-3 (1989)
1984 271	Have parents the right to see their children's medical reports? [6465926] Arch Dis Child 59(7): 601-2 (1984)
1973 272	The ethics of research involving children as controls. [4749679] Arch Dis Child 48(10): 751-2 (1973)
1970 273	Peer review. Cost control or quality control? [5486540] Calif Med 113(6): 75-80 (1970)
1970 274	Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility. [5527892] Calif Med 113(2): 80-5 (1970)
1970 275	Editorial: Peer review. [5527886] Calif Med 113(2): 69-70 (1970)
1970 276	Peer review. [18730260] Calif Med 112(2): 77-8 (1970)
1985 277	Scientific editorials--a precious and scarce element in medical journals. [3971245] Can Med Assoc J 132(4): 315 (1985)
1985 278	How books and journals will survive the electronic revolution. [3967155] Can Med Assoc J 132(3): 232 (1985)
1985 279	Originality, novelty and priority: three words to reckon with in scientific publishing. [3965061] Can Med Assoc J 132(1): 8-9 (1985)
1984 280	The randomized clinical trial: panacea or placebo? [6498685] Can Med Assoc J 131(11): 1336-9 (1984)
1984 281	Could there be a conspiracy to suppress valid treatments of disease? [6689987] Can Med Assoc J 130(1): 15-6 (1984)
1981 282	Author, editor and reviewer: how manuscripts become journal articles. [7471010] Can Med Assoc J 124(6): 664-6 (1981)
1981 283	Peer review and scientific method in clinical research. [7459784] Can Med Assoc J 124(3): 251-3 (1981)
1976 284	Guidelines: what are they and how will they be used? [991039] Can Med Assoc J 115(9): 937-43 (1976)
1976 285	Scientific and medical journals: obsolete or overgrown. [974959] Can Med Assoc J 115(8): 714-5 (1976)
1974 286	CURRENT PEER REVIEW SYSTEMS: A PROBLEM FOR INNOVATIVE APPROACHES IN SCIENCE. [15215984] Cardiovasc Dis 1(2): 67-69 (1974)
2009 287	When does previous disclosure become a 'prior publication' problem? [19136413] Chest 135(1): 233-7 (2009)
2008 288	How many unjustifiable lectures are worth $2.4 billion? [19059955] Chest 134(6): 1117-20 (2008)
2008 289	Abstracts for professional meetings: small but mighty. [18988788] Chest 134(5): 1103-5 (2008)
2008 290	At a glance: a stepwise approach to successful poster presentations. [18682467] Chest 134(2): 457-9 (2008)
2008 291	Keep attendees awake: writing effective presentations for international conferences. [18628227] Chest 134(1): 204-6 (2008)
2008 292	All the sourcing not fit to print: citing electronic material in your article. [18574300] Chest 133(6): 1524-6 (2008)
2007 293	How to choose the right journal for your manuscript. [17873202] Chest 132(3): 1073-6 (2007)
2007 294	Guidelines for guidelines: we've come a long way. [17873187] Chest 132(3): 746-7 (2007)
2007 295	Avoiding common problems during online submission of manuscripts. [17494812] Chest 131(5): 1591-4 (2007)
2007 296	Journal reporting of medical errors: the wisdom of Solomon, the bravery of Achilles, and the foolishness of Pan. [17356109] Chest 131(3): 890-6 (2007)
2007 297	Clinical trial registration promotes patient protection and benefit, advances the trust of everyone, and is required. [17356071] Chest 131(3): 639-41 (2007)
2007 298	Registering a clinical trial in ClinicalTrials.gov. [17303677] Chest 131(3): 909-12 (2007)
2006 299	Writing an application for a human subjects institutional review board. [17099043] Chest 130(5): 1605-7 (2006)
2006 300	Writing successful grant applications for preclinical studies. [16840416] Chest 130(1): 296-8 (2006)
2006 301	Should editorials in peer-reviewed journals be signed? [16778248] Chest 129(6): 1395-6 (2006)
2006 302	Some concrete ideas about manuscript abstracts. [16685031] Chest 129(5): 1375-7 (2006)
2006 303	The uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [16608962] Chest 129(4): 1098-9 (2006)
2006 304	Preparing manuscripts for online submission: basic information and avoidance of common pitfalls. [16537888] Chest 129(3): 822-5 (2006)
2005 305	The NIH Public Access Policy: CHEST's position and concerns regarding the responsibilities of the NIH principle investigator. [15888810] Chest 127(5): 1471-2 (2005)
2005 306	Physician killed by ducks. [15764740] Chest 127(3): 695-6 (2005)
2004 307	Why do physicians who treat lung cancer get sued? [15539742] Chest 126(5): 1672-9 (2004)
2002 308	Ethical assessment of industry-sponsored clinical trials: a case analysis. [11948071] Chest 121(4): 1337-42 (2002)
2000 309	Physicians' learning strategies. [10939995] Chest 118(2 Suppl): 18S-23S (2000)
2000 310	Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques To change physician behavior. [10939994] Chest 118(2 Suppl): 8S-17S (2000)
2000 311	Too many journals, too little time. [10893345] Chest 118(1): 1 (2000)
2000 312	Publishing supplements. [10767216] Chest 117(4): 927-8 (2000)
1996 313	The barbarism of managed care. [8681610] Chest 110(1): 1-2 (1996)
1994 314	The education of a physician. [7956372] Chest 106(5): 1313 (1994)
1987 315	What constitutes prior publication? [3595244] Chest 92(1): 2-3 (1987)
1987 316	Peer review in medical journals. [3802937] Chest 91(2): 252-7 (1987)
1985 317	Modems and the M.D. The microcomputer as a communications tool. [3965264] Chest 87(1): 4-5 (1985)
1982 318	Free medical publications or scientific medical journals. [7067502] Chest 81(4): 397-8 (1982)
1979 319	Identification of reviewers: a statement of policy. [421568] Chest 75(3): 295-6 (1979)
1978 320	Clinical trials and the drug review process. [354887] Chest 73(6 Suppl): 967-71 (1978)
1975 321	Editorial: Books and computer tape, journals and microfiche--who shall pay? [1126216] Chest 67(6): 629-30 (1975)
2008 322	Taboo: crossing the specialty barrier. [18515554] Eur Respir J 31(6): 1153-4 (2008)
2008 323	The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI): a new opportunity for scientific collaboration between academia and industry at the European level. [18448501] Eur Respir J 31(5): 924-6 (2008)
2006 324	Evidence-based medicines for children: Important implications for new therapies at all ages. [17138673] Eur Respir J 28(6): 1069-72 (2006)
2006 325	Excess mortality in patients with asthma on long-acting beta2-agonists. [17074917] Eur Respir J 28(5): 900-2 (2006)
1997 326	Publishing collaborative studies between academics and industry. [9426074] Eur Respir J 10(11): 2441-2 (1997)
2006 327	Publication bias in the pulmonary/allergy literature: effect of pharmaceutical company sponsorship. [16889157] Isr Med Assoc J 8(7): 451-4 (2006)
2009 328	Compensation for research-related injury. [19550049] J Postgrad Med 55(2): 87-8 (2009)
2006 329	Incentives to encourage peer review. [17102563] J Postgrad Med 52(4): 325 (2006)
2005 330	Research trials: registration, reporting and publication. [16006696] J Postgrad Med 51(2): 83-4 (2005)
2005 331	Confusing brand names: nightmare of medical profession. [15793332] J Postgrad Med 51(1): 13-6 (2005)
2005 332	From the pen to the patient: minimising medication errors. [15793329] J Postgrad Med 51(1): 3-4 (2005)
2003 333	Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximizing research impact by maximizing online access. [14699234] J Postgrad Med 49(4): 337-42 (2003)
2001 334	A few steps towards responsible authorship (and editorship). [11832636] J Postgrad Med 47(4): 233-4 (2001)
2001 335	Peer review -- process, perspectives and the path ahead. [11832629] J Postgrad Med 47(3): 210-4 (2001)
2001 336	ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. [11832625] J Postgrad Med 47(3): 199-203 (2001)
2001 337	ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: guideline for good clinical practice. [11832605] J Postgrad Med 47(2): 121-30 (2001)
2001 338	ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. [11590294] J Postgrad Med 47(1): 45-50 (2001)
2000 339	Duplicate and salami publications. [11013467] J Postgrad Med 46(2): 67-9 (2000)
2009 340	Conflicts of interest, authorship, and disclosures in industry-related scientific publications: the tort bar and editorial oversight of medical journals. [19720779] Mayo Clin Proc 84(9): 811-21 (2009)
2009 341	The business of providing high-quality content to Mayo Clinic Proceedings' readers: 2009 and beyond. [19121247] Mayo Clin Proc 84(1): 7-10 (2009)
2006 342	Editor's note: Industry support of articles published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings. [16832914] Mayo Clin Proc 81(6): 851-2 (2006)
2003 343	Rounding alone: assessing the value of grand rounds in contemporary departments of medicine. [12744539] Mayo Clin Proc 78(5): 547-8 (2003)
2003 344	Searching the medical literature using PubMed: a tutorial. [12528881] Mayo Clin Proc 78(1): 87-91 (2003)
2008 345	Identifying and addressing safety signals in clinical trials. [18768938] N Engl J Med 359(13): 1400-2 (2008)
2008 346	Drug-review deadlines and safety problems. [18367738] N Engl J Med 358(13): 1354-61 (2008)
2008 347	Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. [18199864] N Engl J Med 358(3): 252-60 (2008)
2006 348	Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry. [17135585] N Engl J Med 355(22): 2321-9 (2006)
2005 349	Trial Registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005. [16382064] N Engl J Med 353(26): 2779-87 (2005)
2002 350	A national survey of provisions in clinical-trial agreements between medical schools and industry sponsors. [12397192] N Engl J Med 347(17): 1335-41 (2002)
2000 351	A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research. [11096171] N Engl J Med 343(22): 1621-6 (2000)
2000 352	Conflict-of-interest policies for investigators in clinical trials. [11096170] N Engl J Med 343(22): 1616-20 (2000)
2007 353	The use of the World Wide Web by medical journals in 2003 and 2005: an observational study. [17200258] Pediatrics 119(1): e53-60 (2007)
2002 354	Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications? [12165592] Pediatrics 110(2 Pt 1): 364-70 (2002)
2009 355	Marketing data: has the rise of impact factor led to the fall of objective language in the scientific article? [19432970] Respir Res 10(): 35 (2009)
2004 356	Getting grant applications funded: lessons from the past and advice for the future. [15563696] Thorax 59(12): 1010-1 (2004)
1999 357	Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and disclosure of closely related publications. [10212097] Thorax 54(5): 378 (1999)
1986 358	Improving the chances of successful research funding. [3824266] Thorax 41(11): 817-21 (1986)
2008 359	Lies, damned lies, and statistics. [18940535] J Am Coll Cardiol 52(17): 1430-1 (2008)
2007 360	How do I get a paper accepted? Concerns of a junior researcher. [18061076] J Am Coll Cardiol 50(23): 2263; author reply 2263 (2007)
2007 361	How do I get a paper accepted?--Part 2. [17498585] J Am Coll Cardiol 49(19): 1989-90 (2007)
2007 362	How do I get a paper accepted? [17433960] J Am Coll Cardiol 49(15): 1666-7 (2007)
2006 363	Philanthropy and medicine. [17045912] J Am Coll Cardiol 48(8): 1725-6 (2006)
2006 364	An open letter to reviewers (or to anyone whose solicited recommendation has not been followed). [16843195] J Am Coll Cardiol 48(2): 409-10 (2006)
2005 365	Conflation of empiric and nonempiric truths in cardiovascular guidelines. [15862438] J Am Coll Cardiol 45(9): 1551 (2005)
2005 366	Major meetings and the phenomenon of late-breaking clinical trials. [15837267] J Am Coll Cardiol 45(8): 1304-5 (2005)
2005 367	Should the lack of feasibility of conducting controlled trials influence evidence-based guidelines? [15734635] J Am Coll Cardiol 45(5): 810-1; author reply 811 (2005)
2004 368	Open access, open archives, and enhanced public access to National Institutes of Health Research. [15607405] J Am Coll Cardiol 44(12): 2406-7 (2004)
2004 369	Publication bias and journals as policemen. [15489107] J Am Coll Cardiol 44(8): 1707-8 (2004)
2004 370	Characteristics of a great review. [15145127] J Am Coll Cardiol 43(10): 1927 (2004)
2004 371	Authors, industry, and review articles. [15028380] J Am Coll Cardiol 43(6): 1130-1 (2004)
2003 372	What constitutes a great review? [14522501] J Am Coll Cardiol 42(7): 1314-5 (2003)
2003 373	The power of clinical trials and guidelines,and the challenge of conflicts of interest. [12706915] J Am Coll Cardiol 41(8): 1237-42 (2003)
2003 374	Duplicate publication: insights into the essence of a medical journal. [12575985] J Am Coll Cardiol 41(3): 516-7 (2003)
2003 375	The elite reviewer. [12570959] J Am Coll Cardiol 41(1): 157-8 (2003)
2002 376	Peer review: better than the alternatives. [12225731] J Am Coll Cardiol 40(5): 1017-8 (2002)
2001 377	Why did JACC reject my manuscript? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. [11153759] J Am Coll Cardiol 37(1): 323-4 (2001)
2000 378	Full disclosure: the antidote to conflict of interest. [10807478] J Am Coll Cardiol 35(6): 1693 (2000)
1999 379	Editorial independence--what did we learn from the Journal of the American Medical Association? [10362218] J Am Coll Cardiol 33(7): 2083-4 (1999)
1998 380	What's new in peer review? [9857900] J Am Coll Cardiol 32(7): 2098-9 (1998)
1998 381	To publish or not to publish: that is the question. [9809965] J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5): 1468 (1998)
1998 382	Medical Editors Trial Amnesty (META) [9426046] J Am Coll Cardiol 31(1): 236 (1998)
1997 383	We've got to stop meeting like this! [9015004] J Am Coll Cardiol 29(2): 455-6 (1997)
1995 384	Peer review or poor review? [7722151] J Am Coll Cardiol 25(6): 1470-1 (1995)
2004 385	Drug discovery in academia. [14761879] Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286(3): C465-74 (2004)
2000 386	Impact factors and the competitive nature of journal publishing. [10991631] Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 279(2): H457 (2000)
2000 387	Publishing in the journals of the APS: why are authors charged fees? [10775115] Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278(5): H1409-10 (2000)
2008 388	Training the clinician investigator. [18845813] Circ Res 103(8): 771-2 (2008)
2005 389	Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15774862] Circ Res 96(5): 600-1 (2005)
2003 390	The impact of a journal and its editor on a career in experimental cardiology. [12775652] Circ Res 92(10): 1057-8 (2003)
1996 391	A second term for the editors. Status and goals for the review process. [8925556] Circ Res 79(1): 1-3 (1996)
2008 392	Beyond the randomized clinical trial: the role of effectiveness studies in evaluating cardiovascular therapies. [18794402] Circulation 118(12): 1294-303 (2008)
2007 393	Tobacco industry efforts undermining evidence linking secondhand smoke with cardiovascular disease. [17938301] Circulation 116(16): 1845-54 (2007)
2005 394	Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15769778] Circulation 111(10): 1337-8 (2005)
2003 395	Should evidence-based proof of efficacy as defined for a specific therapeutic agent be extrapolated to encompass a therapeutic class of agents? [14638523] Circulation 108(21): 2604-7 (2003)
2000 396	Paying for clinical trials. [10961982] Circulation 102(9): E9016-7 (2000)
2003 397	Medical Practice Guidelines. Separating science from economics. [14585255] Eur Heart J 24(21): 1962-4 (2003)
2008 398	Patenting and licensing in genetic testing: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics. [18432281] Eur J Hum Genet 16 Suppl 1(): S10-9 (2008)
2008 399	Patenting and licensing in genetic testing. [18354424] Eur J Hum Genet 16(4): 405-11 (2008)
2006 400	The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. [16868560] Eur J Hum Genet 14(11): 1170-8 (2006)
2006 401	A review of international and UK-based ethical guidelines for researchers conducting nontherapeutic genetic studies in developing countries. [16175190] Eur J Hum Genet 14(1): 9-16 (2006)
2007 402	Translational research: advancing medical science by stimulating interdisciplinary research. [17526762] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 232(6): 713-4 (2007)
2006 403	Nobel round-table discussion #2: conflicts of interest, scientific misconduct, fair sharing, and intellectual property in an interdisciplinary/inter-institutional consortium. [16816129] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 231(7): 1240-54 (2006)
2006 404	Nobel round-table discussion #1: the future of interdisciplinary research and training. [16816128] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 231(7): 1225-39 (2006)
2002 405	Evidence-based medicine and the need for non-commercial clinical research directed towards therapeutic innovation. [12094006] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 227(7): 435-7 (2002)
2001 406	Clinical investigation: but why? [11682692] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226(10): 871-2 (2001)
2001 407	Crises in academic medicine. [11368416] Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226(4): 239-42 (2001)
2007 408	Teaching how to prepare a manuscript by means of rewriting published scientific papers. [17110479] Genetics 175(1): 17-20 (2007)
2002 409	Current and future relevance of guidelines. [12010924] Heart 87(6): 497-500 (2002)
2000 410	Ethics in research. [10964253] Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 224(4): 205-10 (2000)
2000 411	Introduction: Forum on Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research. [10964252] Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 224(4): 203-4 (2000)
2005 412	Hyposkillia: deficiency of clinical skills. [16392201] Tex Heart Inst J 32(3): 255-7 (2005)
2008 413	Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology. [19020207] AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(6): W213-6 (2008)
2007 414	The Open Access issue revisited. [17886401] AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(4): 753-4 (2007)
2007 415	The demise of the case report. [17646437] AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(2): W54-5 (2007)
2007 416	Ten principles to improve the likelihood of publication of a scientific manuscript. [17449755] AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(5): 1179-82 (2007)
2007 417	Medical illustration techniques for PowerPoint: part 1, The basics. [17377009] AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4): W379-83 (2007)
2007 418	Simple method for inserting Flash movies into PowerPoint presentations. [17377008] AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(4): W374-8 (2007)
2007 419	Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors. [17242215] AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(2): W113-6 (2007)
2006 420	Preparation of digital movie clips for online journal publication. [16794145] AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(1): W93-101 (2006)
2005 421	To peer review or not to peer review: that seems to be the question. [16400751] AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(5): 1101 (2005)
2005 422	Using movie clips in PowerPoint presentations: part 1, compatibility issues. [16177437] AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(4): 1074-8 (2005)
2005 423	A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. [16177399] AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(4): 848-54 (2005)
2005 424	Writing it up: a step-by-step guide to publication for beginning investigators. [16120904] AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(3): 591-6 (2005)
2005 425	Reviewing the reviewers: comparison of review quality and reviewer characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. [15908521] AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(6): 1731-5 (2005)
2004 426	Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. [15547189] AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(6): 1545-50 (2004)
2003 427	Removal of dust and scratches from electronic image files. [12760913] AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(6): 1533-6 (2003)
2003 428	Preparation of digital images for presentation and publication. [12760912] AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(6): 1523-31 (2003)
2002 429	Peer reviewers: reviewing manuscripts. [12438077] AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(6): 1645 (2002)
2002 430	Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies. [12438028] AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(6): 1415-7 (2002)
2002 431	Follow the yellow brick road: preparing a manuscript for submission to a scientific journal. [12388480] AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(5): 1099-100 (2002)
1999 432	Salami slicing, shotgunning, and the ethics of authorship. [10430115] AJR Am J Roentgenol 173(2): 265 (1999)
1999 433	How to avoid "unblinding" the peer review process. [10350273] AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(6): 1474 (1999)
1999 434	Duplicate publications: it's not so much the duplicity as it is the deceit. [9888726] AJR Am J Roentgenol 172(1): 1-2 (1999)
1997 435	Multiple submissions of abstracts: is honesty the policy? [9124136] AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(4): 899-90 (1997)
1995 436	The role of the manuscript reviewer in the peer review process. [7645496] AJR Am J Roentgenol 165(3): 685-8 (1995)
1995 437	Manuscript peer review at the AJR: facts, figures, and quality assessment. [7726010] AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(4): 1007-9 (1995)
1993 438	Manuscript peer review: general concepts and the AJR process. [8424363] AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(2): 409-11 (1993)
1991 439	Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR. [1899764] AJR Am J Roentgenol 156(3): 627-32 (1991)
1989 440	Nobody doesn't read NEJM. But who does? [2735283] AJR Am J Roentgenol 153(1): 187-8 (1989)
1989 441	Irresponsible coauthorship. [2784252] AJR Am J Roentgenol 152(4): 719-20 (1989)
1989 442	On journals: the competition for minds and money. [2783818] AJR Am J Roentgenol 152(3): 645-6 (1989)
1990 443	How to evaluate the radiology literature. [2104704] AJR Am J Roentgenol 154(1): 17-22 (1990)
1989 444	An author's guide to the Guidelines for Authors. [2783277] AJR Am J Roentgenol 152(1): 195-8 (1989)
1988 445	Cooperation between authors and copy editors: one key to high-quality publications. [3262289] AJR Am J Roentgenol 151(4): 829-30 (1988)
1988 446	How research becomes knowledge in radiology: an analysis of citations to published papers. [3257128] AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(1): 31-7 (1988)
1988 447	Threats to the quality of peer-reviewed radiology journals: identification of the problem and possible solutions. [3257120] AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(1): 19-21 (1988)
2006 448	A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. [16751587] J Nucl Med Technol 34(2): 92-9 (2006)
2003 449	The art of publishing methods. [12732665] J Nucl Med 44(5): 661-2 (2003)
2000 450	PubMed Central: the JNM perspective. [10914898] J Nucl Med 41(7): 1123-4 (2000)
2005 451	The agony and the ecstasy of the peer-Review process. [16137958] Indian J Ophthalmol 53(3): 153-5 (2005)
2005 452	Humanity's quest for knowledge--open access--the IJO initiative. [15976461] Indian J Ophthalmol 53(2): 85-6 (2005)
1998 453	Practical suggestions in the writing of a research paper. [10218309] Indian J Ophthalmol 46(4): 247-50 (1998)
2004 454	Advantages and potential dangers of presentation before publication: third in a series on editorship. [15249372] Arch Ophthalmol 122(7): 1045-8 (2004)
2007 455	What is the future of electronic learning in radiology? [17374869] Radiographics 27(2): 559-61 (2007)
2006 456	Creating an interactive Web-based e-learning course: a practical introduction for radiologists. [17018663] Radiographics 26(6): e25; quiz e25 (2006)
2006 457	Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules. [16549616] Radiographics 26(2): 543-51 (2006)
2004 458	Education techniques for lifelong learning: principles of adult learning. [15371622] Radiographics 24(5): 1483-9 (2004)
2004 459	Open access publication in biomedical research: implications for developing countries. [15347853] Indian J Med Res 120(2): 67-9 (2004)
2010 460	Disseminate time-sensitive research faster. [19969559] CMAJ 182(1): 9 (2010)
2009 461	Holiday review. Snappy answers to stupid questions: an evidence-based framework for responding to peer-review feedback. [19969574] CMAJ 181(12): E301-5 (2009)
2009 462	Competing interests of authors. [19933814] CMAJ 181(11): 825 (2009)
2009 463	Perspectives of clinician and biomedical scientists on interdisciplinary health research. [19901042] CMAJ 181(11): 797-803 (2009)
2009 464	Destroyed documents: uncovering the science that Imperial Tobacco Canada sought to conceal. [19828670] CMAJ 181(10): 691-8 (2009)
2008 465	Privatizing health care is not the answer: lessons from the United States. [18838441] CMAJ 179(9): 916-9 (2008)
2008 466	Microresearch: borrowing from the microfinance experience. [18725603] CMAJ 179(5): 399-400 (2008)
2008 467	The need for an institute of continuing health education. [18362368] CMAJ 178(7): 805-6, 809-810 (2008)
2007 468	Congratulations to our colleagues at Open Medicine. [17606942] CMAJ 177(1): 59-61 (2007)
2007 469	Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead. [17548376] CMAJ 177(1): 57-8 (2007)
2007 470	Peer review or barbecue? The choice is clear. [17485681] CMAJ 176(10): 1389, 1391 (2007)
2007 471	Reliability of disclosure forms of authors' contributions. [17200389] CMAJ 176(1): 41-6 (2007)
2006 472	Sources of bias for authors of clinical practice guidelines. [17060643] CMAJ 175(9): 1033, 1035 (2006)
2006 473	Editorial policy: the right to medical information. [16966647] CMAJ 175(6): 557, 559 (2006)
2006 474	Are journals doing enough to prevent fraudulent publication? [16477045] CMAJ 174(4): 431, 433 (2006)
2006 475	Assessing and scaling the knowledge pyramid: the good-guideline guide. [16446477] CMAJ 174(3): 337-8 (2006)
2006 476	On bias and transparency in the development of influential recommendations. [16446476] CMAJ 174(3): 335-6 (2006)
2006 477	Is the current approach to reviewing new drugs condemning the victims of rare diseases to death? A call for a national orphan drug review policy. [16415465] CMAJ 174(2): 189-90 (2006)
2005 478	Clinical practice guidelines and conflict of interest. [16301688] CMAJ 173(11): 1297, 1299 (2005)
2005 479	Why should clinical trials be registered? [15967949] CMAJ 172(13): 1653, 1655 (2005)
2005 480	Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15911839] CMAJ 172(13): 1700-2 (2005)
2005 481	Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results. [15738493] CMAJ 172(5): 661-5 (2005)
2004 482	Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15367465] CMAJ 171(6): 606-7 (2004)
2004 483	Editors' declaration of their own conflicts of interest. [15337729] CMAJ 171(5): 475-6 (2004)
2004 484	Relation between randomized controlled trials published in leading general medical journals and the global burden of disease. [15159365] CMAJ 170(11): 1673-7 (2004)
2004 485	Medical research, the media and open access. [15111449] CMAJ 170(9): 1365, 1367 (2004)
2004 486	Spanish journal wins lawsuit over COX-2 drug editorial. [15023911] CMAJ 170(6): 940 (2004)
2004 487	The 'file drawer' phenomenon: suppressing clinical evidence. [14970071] CMAJ 170(4): 437, 439 (2004)
2003 488	As one journal ends open-access policy, a new one embraces it. [14517139] CMAJ 169(7): 700 (2003)
2003 489	Unwanted results: the ethics of controversial research. [12874140] CMAJ 169(2): 93 (2003)
2003 490	Censoring science. [12796312] CMAJ 168(12): 1517, 1519 (2003)
2003 491	Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research. [12743071] CMAJ 168(10): 1267-9 (2003)
2002 492	An editorial on editorials. [12403740] CMAJ 167(9): 1006-7 (2002)
2002 493	Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies. [12126322] CMAJ 166(13): 1674-5 (2002)
2002 494	Accelerated publication versus usual publication in 2 leading medical journals. [12000245] CMAJ 166(9): 1137-43 (2002)
2001 495	Sponsorship, authorship and accountability. [11584570] CMAJ 165(6): 786-8 (2001)
2001 496	Look, no strings: publishing industry-funded research. [11584556] CMAJ 165(6): 733, 735 (2001)
2001 497	Reports of reports: how good are secondary publications in medicine? [11402798] CMAJ 164(11): 1580-1 (2001)
2001 498	Reviewing the reviewers: the quality of reporting in three secondary journals. [11402795] CMAJ 164(11): 1573-6 (2001)
2001 499	The revised CONSORT statement: honing the cutting edge of the randomized controlled trial. [11338802] CMAJ 164(8): 1157-8 (2001)
2000 500	Who wrote this paper anyway?The new Vancouver Group statement refines the definition of authorship. [11022587] CMAJ 163(6): 716-7 (2000)
2000 501	Capturing zebras: what to do with a reportable case. [10976261] CMAJ 163(4): 429-31 (2000)
1999 502	When editors publish in their own journals. [10928817] CMAJ 161(11): 1412-3 (1999)
1999 503	Journal impact factor: a brief review. [10551195] CMAJ 161(8): 979-80 (1999)
1999 504	When journals are branded, editors get burnt: the ousting of Jerome Kassirer from the New England Journal of Medicine. [10497610] CMAJ 161(5): 529-30 (1999)
1999 505	E-biomed: scientific publishing's brave new world. [10420863] CMAJ 161(1): 41-2 (1999)
1999 506	Reporting medical mistakes and misconduct. [10333839] CMAJ 160(9): 1323-4 (1999)
1998 507	The evolution of clinical trials: inclusion and representation. [9861206] CMAJ 159(11): 1373-4 (1998)
1997 508	A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. [9164400] CMAJ 156(10): 1411-6 (1997)
1995 509	A global network for medical journal editors. [7773893] CMAJ 152(11): 1757-9, 1762-4 (1995)
1995 510	Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [7743450] CMAJ 152(10): 1647-55 (1995)
1995 511	Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [7728695] CMAJ 152(9): 1459-73 (1995)
1994 512	Guidelines for writing guidelines. [8069786] CMAJ 151(5): 507-8 (1994)
1994 513	The review process for applied-research grant proposals: suggestions for revision. [8162545] CMAJ 150(8): 1227-9 (1994)
1994 514	Information for peer reviewers. [8162544] CMAJ 150(8): 1211-22 (1994)
1994 515	Reviewing applied-research grant proposals: can we learn from medical journals? [8162543] CMAJ 150(8): 1207-9 (1994)
1994 516	Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [8287338] CMAJ 150(2): 147-54, 159-67 (1994)
1993 517	Preparing manuscripts for publication: general pointers. [8319152] CMAJ 149(1): 25-8 (1993)
1993 518	Coordination of guidelines development. [8462049] CMAJ 148(8): 1285-8 (1993)
1990 519	Structured abstracts of original research and review articles. [2207917] CMAJ 143(7): 619-22 (1990)
1990 520	Reports of randomized controlled trials: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2390750] CMAJ 143(5): 381-2 (1990)
1990 521	Cohort studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2379125] CMAJ 143(3): 179-80 (1990)
1990 522	Reports of case-control studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2357677] CMAJ 143(1): 17-8 (1990)
1990 523	Illustrative material: what editors and readers expect from authors. [1689205] CMAJ 142(5): 447-9 (1990)
1990 524	Statistics in biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2302611] CMAJ 142(3): 213-4 (1990)
1989 525	Descriptive studies: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2804843] CMAJ 141(9): 879-80 (1989)
1989 526	Editorials and platform articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2790601] CMAJ 141(7): 666-7 (1989)
1989 527	Case reports: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2766176] CMAJ 141(5): 379-80 (1989)
1989 528	Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2752346] CMAJ 141(3): 195-7 (1989)
1989 529	Biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. [2731098] CMAJ 141(1): 17-9 (1989)
1988 530	Editorial freedom: a statement. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [3179886] CMAJ 139(9): 833 (1988)
1988 531	Two cheers for meta-analysis: problems and opportunities in aggregating results of clinical trials. [3365624] CMAJ 138(10): 891-5 (1988)
1988 532	Guidelines for reading literature reviews. [3355948] CMAJ 138(8): 697-703 (1988)
1988 533	The use of textbooks in evaluating the impact of medical journals. [3355947] CMAJ 138(8): 685-6 (1988)
1987 534	Reviewing and editing: a shared responsibility. [3594328] CMAJ 137(1): 16 (1987)
1987 535	Reviewing the reviewers. [3594327] CMAJ 137(1): 15 (1987)
1986 536	The joys of revising a manuscript. [3708476] CMAJ 134(12): 1328 (1986)
1986 537	How CMAJ controls the quality of its scientific articles. [3942936] CMAJ 134(4): 301-3 (1986)
1985 538	Searching for a scientific writing style. [4042024] CMAJ 133(7): 632-3 (1985)
1985 539	Why case reports? [4027796] CMAJ 133(5): 353 (1985)
2000 540	How to create an effective scientific exhibit: analysis of award-winning exhibits from the 1998 RSNA meeting. [10903695] Radiographics 20(4): 1059-72; quiz 1109-10, 1112 (2000)
2010 541	Explore the potential next generation of interactive radiology literature in RadioGraphics. [20631356] Radiographics 30(4): 849-50 (2010)
2006 542	Bias in research studies. [16505391] Radiology 238(3): 780-9 (2006)
2004 543	Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly. [15166324] Radiology 232(1): 101-6 (2004)
2009 544	Reviewing manuscripts for the American Journal of Neuroradiology: responsibilities, challenges, and rewards. [19112070] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(4): 637-8 (2009)
2009 545	Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: a follow-up analysis. [19001539] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2): 253-6 (2009)
2009 546	Citations and open access: questionable benefits. [18842768] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2): 215-6 (2009)
2009 547	Humanitarians, compassion, and the Food and Drug Administration: guidance for the practitioner. [19022865] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(2): 216-8 (2009)
2009 548	Print on demand and scientific publishing. [18842765] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(1): 1-2 (2009)
2008 549	Identifying the source of printed scientific literature. [18653679] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(9): 1603-4 (2008)
2008 550	On-line self-archiving of articles: are we ready? [18583407] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(7): 1227 (2008)
2008 551	Cross-checking for plagiarism. [18544669] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(6): 1035 (2008)
2008 552	Benefits and dangers of university-sponsored open-access systems. [18397965] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(4): 617-8 (2008)
1999 553	The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. [10445467] AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(6): 1173-7 (1999)
2009 554	Medical journal editing: who shall pay? [19581649] Ann Intern Med 151(1): 68-9 (2009)
2009 555	ACP Journal Club. What kind of randomized trials do patients and clinicians need? [19451559] Ann Intern Med 150(10): JC5-2, JC5-3 (2009)
2009 556	ACP Journal Club. Interpreting meta-analyses in systematic reviews. [19238601] Ann Intern Med 150(4): JC2-2, JC2-3 (2009)
2008 557	The science and art of deduction: complex systematic overviews. [18490692] Ann Intern Med 148(10): 786-8 (2008)
2008 558	Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. [18490690] Ann Intern Med 148(10): 776-82 (2008)
2007 559	How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. [17638714] Ann Intern Med 147(4): 224-33 (2007)
2007 560	Clinical trial registration: looking back and moving ahead. [17548404] Ann Intern Med 147(4): 275-7 (2007)
2007 561	Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. [17577007] Ann Intern Med 146(12): 878-81 (2007)
2007 562	Institutional review board review of multicenter studies. [17502642] Ann Intern Med 146(10): 759 (2007)
2006 563	Career changes in medicine: Part II. [17116924] Ann Intern Med 145(10): 782-3 (2006)
2006 564	Narrative review: the promotion of gabapentin: an analysis of internal industry documents. [16908919] Ann Intern Med 145(4): 284-93 (2006)
2006 565	Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case. [16522625] Ann Intern Med 144(8): 609-13 (2006)
2005 566	Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [16027458] Ann Intern Med 143(2): 146-8 (2005)
2004 567	Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. [15545678] Ann Intern Med 141(10): 781-8 (2004)
2004 568	Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15355883] Ann Intern Med 141(6): 477-8 (2004)
2003 569	Peer review: integral to Science and indispensable to Annals. [14678925] Ann Intern Med 139(12): 1038-40 (2003)
2003 570	The cost of institutional review board procedures in multicenter observational research. [12834327] Ann Intern Med 139(1): 77 (2003)
2002 571	Reflections on medical journals: has progress made them better? [12093244] Ann Intern Med 137(1): 46-8 (2002)
2002 572	Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there? [12093240] Ann Intern Med 137(1): 10-6 (2002)
2002 573	Paying research subjects: an analysis of current policies. [11874309] Ann Intern Med 136(5): 368-73 (2002)
2001 574	Core safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent. [11578155] Ann Intern Med 135(7): 514-23 (2001)
2001 575	Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. [11560460] Ann Intern Med 135(6): 463-6 (2001)
2001 576	The Cochrane Collaboration. [11511165] Ann Intern Med 135(4): 309-12 (2001)
2001 577	Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. [11453711] Ann Intern Med 135(2): 112-23 (2001)
2001 578	Who is a peer? [11182858] Ann Intern Med 134(4): 346-7 (2001)
2001 579	Reporting standards and the transparency of trials. [11177328] Ann Intern Med 134(2): 169-72 (2001)
2001 580	Institutional review boards: a crisis in confidence. [11177321] Ann Intern Med 134(2): 161-3 (2001)
2001 581	Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards. [11177319] Ann Intern Med 134(2): 152-7 (2001)
2001 582	Authors, editors, and readers in the brave new (electronic) world. [11187424] Ann Intern Med 134(1): 78 (2001)
2000 583	Young physician-scientists: internal Medicine's challenge. [11085847] Ann Intern Med 133(10): 831-2 (2000)
2000 584	News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [10906840] Ann Intern Med 133(3): 229-31 (2000)
1999 585	The medical review article revisited: has the science improved? [10610646] Ann Intern Med 131(12): 947-51 (1999)
1999 586	Fire ant attacks on residents in health care facilities: a report of two cases. [10498558] Ann Intern Med 131(6): 424-9 (1999)
1999 587	Medical Writings revisited. [10475893] Ann Intern Med 131(5): 389-90 (1999)
1999 588	Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. [10383350] Ann Intern Med 130(12): 1005-13 (1999)
1999 589	Care at the end of life: guiding practice where there are no easy answers. [10357697] Ann Intern Med 130(9): 772-4 (1999)
1999 590	Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. [10215563] Ann Intern Med 130(8): 661-70 (1999)
1998 591	Masking, blinding, and peer review. [9669986] Ann Intern Med 129(2): 165 (1998)
1998 592	Ethics manual. Fourth edition. American College of Physicians. [9518406] Ann Intern Med 128(7): 576-94 (1998)
1998 593	Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded. [9424984] Ann Intern Med 128(1): 66-8 (1998)
1997 594	Integrating heterogeneous pieces of evidence in systematic reviews. [9412305] Ann Intern Med 127(11): 989-95 (1997)
1997 595	Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. [9382404] Ann Intern Med 127(9): 820-6 (1997)
1997 596	Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review. [9313021] Ann Intern Med 127(7): 531-7 (1997)
1997 597	Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. [9273830] Ann Intern Med 127(5): 380-7 (1997)
1997 598	The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. [9245227] Ann Intern Med 127(3): 210-6 (1997)
1997 599	How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. [9214251] Ann Intern Med 127(1): 37-42 (1997)
1997 600	Using systematic reviews in clinical education. [9163290] Ann Intern Med 126(11): 886-91 (1997)
1997 601	Locating and appraising systematic reviews. [9092319] Ann Intern Med 126(7): 532-8 (1997)
1997 602	Systematic reviews: critical links in the great chain of evidence. [9054284] Ann Intern Med 126(5): 389-91 (1997)
1997 603	Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. [9054282] Ann Intern Med 126(5): 376-80 (1997)
1996 604	Dose-response characteristics of cholesterol-lowering drug therapies: implications for treatment. [8967711] Ann Intern Med 125(12): 990-1000 (1996)
1996 605	Megatrials for clinical decision making. [8815765] Ann Intern Med 125(7): 621; author reply 621-2 (1996)
1996 606	Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? [8815760] Ann Intern Med 125(7): 605-13 (1996)
1994 607	Does editorial peer review work? [8198351] Ann Intern Med 121(1): 60-1 (1994)
1994 608	Medical treatment for stroke prevention. [7880225] Ann Intern Med 121(1): 41-53 (1994)
1994 609	Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. [8135452] Ann Intern Med 120(8): 667-76 (1994)
1993 610	New international ethical guidelines for research involving human subjects. [8328746] Ann Intern Med 119(4): 339-41 (1993)
1993 611	Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [8452334] Ann Intern Med 118(8): 646-7 (1993)
2009 612	Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. [19336712] JAMA 301(13): 1367-72 (2009)
2008 613	Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. [18780847] JAMA 300(10): 1181-96 (2008)
2008 614	Reporting mortality findings in trials of rofecoxib for Alzheimer disease or cognitive impairment: a case study based on documents from rofecoxib litigation. [18413875] JAMA 299(15): 1813-7 (2008)
2008 615	Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. [18413874] JAMA 299(15): 1800-12 (2008)
2007 616	Issues in the registration of clinical trials. [17507347] JAMA 297(19): 2112-20 (2007)
2007 617	Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review. [17374817] JAMA 297(11): 1233-40 (2007)
2006 618	How conducting a clinical trial affects physicians' guideline adherence and drug preferences. [16788131] JAMA 295(23): 2759-64 (2006)
2006 619	Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners. [16622142] JAMA 295(15): 1801-8 (2006)
2006 620	Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. [16609089] JAMA 295(14): 1675-80 (2006)
2006 621	Transition from meeting abstract to full-length journal article for randomized controlled trials. [16537738] JAMA 295(11): 1281-7 (2006)
2006 622	Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. [16449620] JAMA 295(5): 547-53 (2006)
2006 623	Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. [16418467] JAMA 295(3): 314-7 (2006)
2005 624	Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review. [16264162] JAMA 294(17): 2203-9 (2005)
2005 625	Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. [15900006] JAMA 293(19): 2362-6 (2005)
2004 626	Digital information archiving policies in high-impact medical and scientific periodicals. [15585731] JAMA 292(22): 2724-6 (2004)
2004 627	Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials. [15523074] JAMA 292(17): 2130-40 (2004)
2004 628	Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. [15238595] JAMA 292(1): 86-8 (2004)
2004 629	Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. [15161896] JAMA 291(20): 2457-65 (2004)
2004 630	Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. [14982913] JAMA 291(8): 974-80 (2004)
2004 631	NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research. [14970062] JAMA 291(7): 836-43 (2004)
2003 632	Comparison between impact factors and citations in evidence-based practice guidelines. [12915427] JAMA 290(6): 755-6 (2003)
2003 633	Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. [12876092] JAMA 290(4): 495-501 (2003)
2003 634	Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. [12533125] JAMA 289(4): 454-65 (2003)
2002 635	Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. [12038937] JAMA 287(21): 2869-71 (2002)
2002 636	Qualitative and quantitative measures of indexed health sciences electronic journals. [12038935] JAMA 287(21): 2865-6 (2002)
2002 637	Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals. [12038932] JAMA 287(21): 2853-6 (2002)
2002 638	Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. [12038930] JAMA 287(21): 2847-50 (2002)
2002 639	Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge. [12038929] JAMA 287(21): 2843-7 (2002)
2002 640	US legal principles and confidentiality of the peer review process. [12038928] JAMA 287(21): 2839-41 (2002)
2002 641	Publication bias in editorial decision making. [12038924] JAMA 287(21): 2825-8 (2002)
2002 642	Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic review. [12038923] JAMA 287(21): 2821-4 (2002)
2002 643	Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. [12038918] JAMA 287(21): 2805-8 (2002)
2002 644	Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. [12038916] JAMA 287(21): 2799-801 (2002)
2002 645	Identifying manuscript reviewers: randomized comparison of asking first or just sending. [12038915] JAMA 287(21): 2795-6 (2002)
2002 646	Prodding tardy reviewers: a randomized comparison of telephone, fax, and e-mail. [12038914] JAMA 287(21): 2794-5 (2002)
2002 647	Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction. [12038913] JAMA 287(21): 2790-3 (2002)
2002 648	Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. [12038912] JAMA 287(21): 2786-90 (2002)
2002 649	Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. [12038911] JAMA 287(21): 2784-6 (2002)
2002 650	The hidden research paper. [12038909] JAMA 287(21): 2775-8 (2002)
2002 651	Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. [12038907] JAMA 287(21): 2769-71 (2002)
2002 652	Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. [11829700] JAMA 287(5): 612-7 (2002)
1999 653	Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. [10349893] JAMA 281(20): 1900-5 (1999)
1998 654	Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: setting the balance right. [9676691] JAMA 280(3): 300-2 (1998)
1998 655	Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal. [9676686] JAMA 280(3): 290-1 (1998)
1998 656	The reported training and experience of editors in chief of specialist clinical medical journals. [9676684] JAMA 280(3): 286-7 (1998)
1998 657	Reviewing the reviews: the example of chronic fatigue syndrome. [9676676] JAMA 280(3): 264-6 (1998)
1998 658	Adherence to published standards of reporting: a comparison of placebo-controlled trials published in English or German. [9676671] JAMA 280(3): 247-9 (1998)
1998 659	US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. [9676670] JAMA 280(3): 246-7 (1998)
1998 660	Masking author identity in peer review: what factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators. [9676669] JAMA 280(3): 243-5 (1998)
1998 661	Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. [9676668] JAMA 280(3): 240-2 (1998)
1998 662	Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. [9676666] JAMA 280(3): 234-7 (1998)
1998 663	What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? [9676665] JAMA 280(3): 231-3 (1998)
1998 664	Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts. [9676664] JAMA 280(3): 229-31 (1998)
2000 665	Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. [10861325] N Engl J Med 342(25): 1887-92 (2000)
1997 666	Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries. [9309109] N Engl J Med 337(14): 1003-5 (1997)
1997 667	Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. [9262498] N Engl J Med 337(8): 536-42 (1997)
1997 668	Absence of association between insurance copayments and delays in seeking emergency care among patients with myocardial infarction. [9180090] N Engl J Med 336(24): 1722-9 (1997)
2001 669	Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. [11577056] West J Med 175(4): 259 (2001)
2001 670	Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice. [11290685] West J Med 174(4): 262-5 (2001)
1989 671	The peer review process. [2603425] West J Med 151(5): 561 (1989)
2007 672	Occurrence and persistence of bacterial and viral faecal indicators in wastewater biofilms. [17547008] Water Sci Technol 55(8-9): 377-85 (2007)
2004 673	Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. [15271643] Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287(2): E189-91 (2004)
2004 674	Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism. [15010353] Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286(4): E495-501 (2004)
2000 675	Publishing in the journals of the APS: why are authors charged fees? [10780929] Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278(5): E757-8 (2000)
2003 676	At jeopardy: the NIH as we know it. [12975281] Arch Neurol 60(9): 1191-2 (2003)
2000 677	The Arthritis Research non-peer-review depository. [11219388] Arthritis Res 2(1): 1 (2000)
2008 678	What journal citations teach us about rheumatic diseases. [18240270] Arthritis Rheum 58(2 Suppl): S153-9 (2008)
2008 679	Traditional publications: an endangered species? [18240269] Arthritis Rheum 58(2 Suppl): S149-52 (2008)
2006 680	Drug evaluation and approval process in the European Union. [16463405] Arthritis Rheum 55(1): 12-4 (2006)
2006 681	A Food and Drug Administration primer. [16463403] Arthritis Rheum 55(1): 4-8 (2006)
2005 682	New journal policy regarding registration of clinical trials. [16052548] Arthritis Rheum 52(8): 2243-7 (2005)
2004 683	Open access, yes! Open excess, no! [15096439] Blood 103(9): 3257 (2004)
2001 684	Removing the cloud from industry-sponsored, multicentered clinical trials. [11567981] Blood 98(7): 2001 (2001)
2001 685	Access to the biomedical literature: a stand against coercion. [11290578] Blood 97(8): 2195-6 (2001)
2002 686	Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. [11872625] Brain 125(Pt 3): i-ii (2002)
2004 687	Intuition and innumeracy. [15257335] Cell Biol Educ 3(2): 88-90 (2004)
2008 688	Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews. [18400967] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3(4): 1102-14 (2008)
2007 689	Commentary on "Influence of industry on renal guideline development". [17699413] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(2): 211 (2007)
2007 690	Translating guidelines into policy. [17699412] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(2): 209-10 (2007)
2007 691	Comments on the guideline debate. [17699411] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(2): 208 (2007)
2007 692	Influence of industry on renal guideline development. [17699377] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2(1): 3-7; discussion 13-4 (2007)
2006 693	Strategies for successful patient oriented research: why did I (not) get funded? [17699226] Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1(2): 340-3 (2006)
2000 694	The Cochrane collaboration and its possible impact on diabetes care. [10977007] Diabetes Care 23(9): 1217-8 (2000)
2007 695	Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence. [17303614] Gut 56 Suppl 1(-): 1-113 (2007)
2005 696	How Gut handles your manuscript. [16284280] Gut 54(12): 1667 (2005)
2001 697	Retractions in Gut 10 years after publication. [11171811] Gut 48(3): 285-6 (2001)
1997 698	Research misconduct. [9274461] Gut 41(1): 1-2 (1997)
2010 699	How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals. [20065074] Haematologica 95(1): 1-2 (2010)
2009 700	Paying for open access. [19483155] Haematologica 94(6): 764 (2009)
2006 701	Registration of clinical trials: a step forward but still a long path ahead. [16531252] Haematologica 91(3): 295-6 (2006)
2006 702	Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [16531251] Haematologica 91(3): 293-5 (2006)
2004 703	International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE): Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. [15020262] Haematologica 89(3): 264 (2004)
2001 704	Immunosuppressive non-myeloablative allografting as salvage therapy in advanced Hodgkin's disease. [11694399] Haematologica 86(11): 1121-3 (2001)
2007 705	Trials and tribulations of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [18024670] Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program -(-): 493-7 (2007)
2007 706	Are there circumstances in which phase 2 study results should be practice-changing? [18024669] Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program -(-): 489-92 (2007)
2001 707	A guide to planning careers in hematology and oncology. [11723001] Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program -(-): 499-506 (2001)
2009 708	Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan: evaluation of adherence to the CONSORT statement. [19252352] Intern Med 48(5): 307-13 (2009)
2005 709	Uniform clinical trial registration policy for journals of kidney diseases, dialysis, and transplantation. [15743992] J Am Soc Nephrol 16(4): 837 (2005)
2004 710	The number, quality, and coverage of randomized controlled trials in nephrology. [14747388] J Am Soc Nephrol 15(2): 411-9 (2004)
2008 711	Randomized trial reporting in general endocrine journals: the good, the bad, and the ugly. [18842985] J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(10): 3733-4 (2008)
2008 712	Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in general endocrinology literature. [18583463] J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(10): 3810-6 (2008)
2008 713	A case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. [18171699] J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(3): 666-73 (2008)
2009 714	How to write an effective referee report. [19422091] J Clin Invest 119(5): 1058-60 (2009)
2008 715	Publish or perish, but at what cost? [18596904] J Clin Invest 118(7): 2368 (2008)
2007 716	How to write a scientific masterpiece. [18060016] J Clin Invest 117(12): 3599-602 (2007)
2005 717	Payment of clinical research subjects. [16007244] J Clin Invest 115(7): 1681-7 (2005)
2003 718	Responsible conduct in animal research. [14617743] J Clin Invest 112(10): 1456 (2003)
1999 719	The physician-scientist: an essential--and fragile--link in the medical research chain. [10377167] J Clin Invest 103(12): 1621-6 (1999)
1997 720	The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered--but still beloved. [9185499] J Clin Invest 99(12): 2803-12 (1997)
1994 721	Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation. [8182120] J Clin Invest 93(5): 1877-80 (1994)
1994 722	The screening review system: fair or foul? [8182119] J Clin Invest 93(5): 1871-4 (1994)
2005 723	Translating research into cancer molecular diagnostics and patents. [16049278] J Clin Pathol 58(8): 793-4 (2005)
2002 724	Electronic publishing and internet learning. [12461043] J Clin Pathol 55(12): 881-2 (2002)
1986 725	Guidelines on authorship: INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS. [16811159] J Clin Pathol 39(1): 110 (1986)
1978 726	Editorial: Authorships and acknowledgements. [16811108] J Clin Pathol 31(4): 299 (1978)
2005 727	Advanced online publication. [15897491] J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(6): 759 (2005)
2002 728	Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. [11796759] J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(2): 143 (2002)
1999 729	Giving something back to the authors. [10486381] J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67(4): 419 (1999)
1994 730	Archie Cochrane's challenge: can periodically updated reviews of all randomised controlled trials relevant to neurology and neurosurgery be produced? [8201319] J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57(5): 529-33 (1994)
2008 731	The NIH Public Access Policy. [18417688] J Neurosci 28(16): 4109 (2008)
2006 732	Open access and the future of the scientific research article. [17021163] J Neurosci 26(40): 10079-81 (2006)
2006 733	Reinventing the biomedical journal. [17005847] J Neurosci 26(39): 9837-8 (2006)
2006 734	Will research sharing keep pace with the Internet? [16971518] J Neurosci 26(37): 9349-51 (2006)
2009 735	Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: an issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money. [19949717] J Psychiatry Neurosci 34(6): 412-7 (2009)
2008 736	Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience peer review process, with advice for authors. [18197266] J Psychiatry Neurosci 33(1): 7-9 (2008)
2006 737	Ecological momentary assessment: what it is and why it is a method of the future in clinical psychopharmacology. [16496031] J Psychiatry Neurosci 31(1): 13-20 (2006)
2004 738	Ethical conduct of journal editors. [15486604] J Psychiatry Neurosci 29(5): 334-6 (2004)
2004 739	The physician-scientist in Canadian psychiatry. [14719050] J Psychiatry Neurosci 29(1): 49-56 (2004)
2003 740	Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice. [14517575] J Psychiatry Neurosci 28(5): 327-30 (2003)
1998 741	Risk in research--from the Nuremberg Code to the tri-council code: implications for clinical trials of psychotropic drugs. [9595888] J Psychiatry Neurosci 23(3): 149-55 (1998)
1998 742	Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper. [9676663] JAMA 280(3): 227-8 (1998)
1998 743	Financial interest and its disclosure in scientific publications. [9676662] JAMA 280(3): 225-6 (1998)
1998 744	Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. [9676661] JAMA 280(3): 222-4 (1998)
1998 745	What are the factors determining authorship and the order of the authors' names? A study among authors of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde (Dutch Journal of Medicine). [9676659] JAMA 280(3): 217-8 (1998)
1998 746	Alcohol screening questionnaires in women: a critical review. [9669791] JAMA 280(2): 166-71 (1998)
1998 747	Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals. [9628712] JAMA 279(22): 1808-12 (1998)
2008 748	Negative outcome studies in end-stage renal disease: how dark are the storm clouds? [18032412] Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(1): 56-61 (2008)
2008 749	A well-conducted randomized trial that establishes no benefit of therapy is an important medical advance. [17977874] Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(1): 52-5 (2008)
2005 750	Trial registry policy: common editorial statement a uniform clinical trial registration policy for journals of kidney diseases, dialysis and transplantation. [15772264] Nephrol Dial Transplant 20(4): 691 (2005)
2003 751	Stopping a medical research project for financial reasons. [13679470] Nephrol Dial Transplant 18(10): 1982-3 (2003)
1998 752	How is the annual congress of your society managed? (Reflection on the ethics and finances of medical congresses). [9761498] Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(9): 2207-9 (1998)
1998 753	Honesty in publication. [9641161] Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(6): 1365-7 (1998)
1996 754	Systematic reviews and their roles in promoting evidence-based medicine in renal disease. [9017610] Nephrol Dial Transplant 11(12): 2398-401 (1996)
2005 755	The quest for market exclusivity in biotechnology: navigating the patent minefield. [16489366] NeuroRx 2(4): 572-8 (2005)
2004 756	Evidence from clinical trials: can we do better? [15717039] NeuroRx 1(3): 363-71 (2004)
2004 757	Policy-relevant research: when does it matter? [15717038] NeuroRx 1(3): 356-62 (2004)
2004 758	Observational versus experimental studies: what's the evidence for a hierarchy? [15717036] NeuroRx 1(3): 341-7 (2004)
2004 759	From evidence to action. [15717035] NeuroRx 1(3): 331-40 (2004)
2004 760	Evidence from biomarkers and surrogate endpoints. [15717034] NeuroRx 1(3): 323-30 (2004)
2004 761	FDA: evidentiary standards for drug development and approval. [15717032] NeuroRx 1(3): 307-16 (2004)
2004 762	Biomarkers and surrogate outcomes in neurodegenerative disease: lessons from multiple sclerosis. [15717029] NeuroRx 1(2): 284-94 (2004)
1991 763	The industrialization of the hospitals and the unhappiness of the physicians. [1854865] Perit Dial Int 11(2): 107, 109 (1991)
2006 764	A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: signs of change? [16754709] Postgrad Med J 82(968): 397-9 (2006)
2002 765	Clinical application of findings of clinical trials and systematic reviews. [11884692] Postgrad Med J 78(917): 129-30 (2002)
2001 766	Training of junior doctors: the responsibility of consultants and trainers. [11723310] Postgrad Med J 77(914): 745-6 (2001)
2001 767	Education and training in internal medicine in Europe. [11677285] Postgrad Med J 77(913): 727-31 (2001)
2001 768	Getting our journals to developing countries. [11524510] Postgrad Med J 77(911): 554-5 (2001)
2001 769	Learning to teach. [11375447] Postgrad Med J 77(908): 361-2 (2001)
2000 770	Peer review in health sciences. [11085789] Postgrad Med J 76(902): 815 (2000)
2000 771	Evidence based medicine overviews, bulletins, guidelines, and the new consensus. [10878193] Postgrad Med J 76(897): 383-9 (2000)
1995 772	Clinical guidelines: development, implementation, and effectiveness. [7708589] Postgrad Med J 71(831): 3-9 (1995)
2008 773	Identifying low-quality preclinical studies. [18635834] Stroke 39(10): 2697-8 (2008)
2008 774	Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. [18583557] Stroke 39(8): e139; author reply e140 (2008)
2007 775	Nonconventional clinical trial designs: approaches to provide more precise estimates of treatment effects with a smaller sample size, but at a cost. [17261743] Stroke 38(2 Suppl): 804-8 (2007)
2006 776	Frequency and determinants of nonpublication of research in the stroke literature. [16931779] Stroke 37(10): 2588-92 (2006)
2005 777	Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. [15800253] Stroke 36(4): 924-5 (2005)
2004 778	Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. [15060322] Stroke 35(5): 1203-8 (2004)
2004 779	Sample size calculations in acute stroke trials: a systematic review of their reporting, characteristics, and relationship with outcome. [15031455] Stroke 35(5): 1216-24 (2004)
2004 780	Meta-analysis reported incompatible statistics and omitted pertinent studies. [15001792] Stroke 35(4): e79-80; author reply e79-80 (2004)
2003 781	Conducting stroke research with an exception from the requirement for informed consent. [12663878] Stroke 34(5): 1317-23 (2003)
2003 782	Recommendations for the relationship between sponsors and investigators in the design and conduct of clinical stroke trials. [12649514] Stroke 34(4): 1041-5 (2003)
2001 783	Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. [11739964] Stroke 32(12): 2734 (2001)
2001 784	Authors should be accurate when describing study design. [11283410] Stroke 32(4): 1048-9 (2001)
1999 785	Reports of randomized trials in acute stroke, 1955 to 1995. What proportions were commercially sponsored? [10512897] Stroke 30(10): 1995-8 (1999)
1999 786	An observation: role of the M.D., Ph.D. in science. [10416261] Toxicol Sci 49(2): 165 (1999)
2009 787	Baishideng's century goal: editing and publishing high-quality articles. [19701962] World J Gastroenterol 15(31): 3841-4 (2009)
2008 788	Concentrations and characteristics of organochlorine pesticides in aquatic biota from Qiantang River in China. [17499409] Environ Pollut 151(1): 190-9 (2008)
2004 789	Who owns the data? [15558736] Hepatology 40(6): 1237 (2004)
1996 790	Redundant publication: a form of reader abuse. [8707273] Hepatology 24(1): 268-9 (1996)
1975 791	[Leukocytosis and the fibrinolytic activity of the blood in patients with leukemia]. [1060059] Probl Gematol Pereliv Krovi 20(10): 39-42 (1975)
2007 792	WTP and WTA: do people think differently? [17499410] Soc Sci Med 65(5): 946-57 (2007)
2006 793	Fraudulent human embryonic stem cell research in South Korea: lessons learned. [16770863] Account Res 13(1): 101-9 (2006)
2010 794	Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. [20306350] Account Res 17(2): 79-84 (2010)
2007 795	The influence of market exclusivity on drug availability and medical innovations. [17915833] AAPS J 9(3): E312-6 (2007)
2007 796	Intellectual property policy in the pharmaceutical sciences: the effect of inappropriate patents and market exclusivity extensions on the health care system. [17915832] AAPS J 9(3): E306-11 (2007)
2007 797	Basics of US patents and the patent system. [17915834] AAPS J 9(3): E317-24 (2007)
2008 798	An overview of patent law as applied to the field of veterinary medicine. [18446500] AAPS J 10(1): 1-8 (2008)
2011 799	Peer review, science, young investigators feelings and frustrations. [21271208] Acta Cir Bras 26(1): 77-8 (2011)
2006 800	Structured abstracts: narrative review. [16862349] Acta Cir Bras 21(4): 263-8 (2006)
2007 801	Tips and tricks in writing review article. [17936960] Acta Med Indones 39(3): 143-4 (2007)
2004 802	How to review a manuscript: a "down-to-earth" approach. [15298858] Acad Psychiatry 28(2): 81-7 (2004)
2008 803	Practical strategies for becoming a successful medical book author. [18467473] Acad Psychiatry 32(3): 183-7 (2008)
2009 804	Authorship in scholarly manuscripts: practical considerations for resident and early career physicians. [19349451] Acad Psychiatry 33(1): 76-9 (2009)
2010 805	Moving towards open access: high-quality research and publication is essential, but visibility of the work is critical. [20107714] Acta Derm Venereol 90(1): 3 (2010)
2008 806	Why are the Acta Neuropathologica so fast, with a mean time from submission to first decision of 16 days? [18236052] Acta Neuropathol 115(3): 371-2 (2008)
2011 807	The perils of medical journal editorship in developing countries. [21478576] Afr J Paediatr Surg 8(1): 1-3 (2011)
2009 808	The copyright transfer agreement: we sign it, but do we understand it? [19320070] AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4): 849-51 (2009)
2003 809	How to review a paper. [12760840] Adv Physiol Educ 27(1-4): 47-52 (2003)
2007 810	Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society: the sequel. [18057394] Adv Physiol Educ 31(4): 295-8 (2007)
2009 811	Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? [19261753] Adv Physiol Educ 33(1): 7-9 (2009)
2007 812	The ups and downs of peer review. [17562902] Adv Physiol Educ 31(2): 145-52 (2007)
2007 813	Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience students write to the lay public. [17562906] Adv Physiol Educ 31(2): 167-75 (2007)
2005 814	Ethics and scientific publication. [15905149] Adv Physiol Educ 29(2): 59-74 (2005)
2010 815	Peer review--do unto others ... [20504852] Am J Epidemiol 171(12): 1249 (2010)
2008 816	Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process. [18698392] Am J Pharm Educ 72(3): 69 (2008)
2003 817	A researcher's guide to patents. [12857793] Plant Physiol 132(3): 1127-30 (2003)
2003 818	Databases in the biological sciences. A user's guide to the current copyright landscape. [12857794] Plant Physiol 132(3): 1131-4 (2003)
2003 819	Copyright protection and open access. [14594772] Am J Clin Nutr 78(5): 899-901 (2003)
2011 820	Getting your paper published: an editor's perspective. [21245603] Ann Saudi Med 31(1): 72-6 (2011)
2006 821	Importance of free access to research articles on decision to submit to the BMJ: survey of authors. [16401629] BMJ 332(7538): 394-6 (2006)
2006 822	Detecting plagiarism: meaning of citations is important. [17008683] BMJ 333(7570): 706 (2006)
2006 823	Another reason for opening access to research. [17185718] BMJ 333(7582): 1306-8 (2006)
2006 824	How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. [17185707] BMJ 333(7582): 1283-4 (2006)
2006 825	Scrooge and intellectual property rights. [17185703] BMJ 333(7582): 1279-80 (2006)
2002 826	Article makes simple errors and could cause unnecessary deaths. [11799038] BMJ 324(7330): 167 (2002)
2011 827	Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. [22028479] BMJ 343(-): d6128 (2011)
2011 828	Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel. [21951756] BMJ 343(-): d4797 (2011)
2004 829	Journal rejects article after objections from marketing department. [15133870] BMJ 328(7434): 244 (2004)
2004 830	Open access publishing takes off. [14703521] BMJ 328(7430): 1-3 (2004)
2004 831	Screening research papers by reading abstracts. [15331455] BMJ 329(7464): 470-1 (2004)
2004 832	Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports. [15528623] BMJ 329(7474): 1093-6 (2004)
2005 833	Why doctors don't read research papers: editors' behaviour might have something to do with it. [15677678] BMJ 330(7485): 256 (2005)
2005 834	Dealing with editorial misconduct: what about spin? [15705712] BMJ 330(7487): 364 (2005)
2003 835	When to retract? [14563721] BMJ 327(7420): 883-4 (2003)
2007 836	Dealing with scientific misconduct. [17855286] BMJ 335(7619): 524-5 (2007)
2007 837	Open access will mean peer review will become "the job of the many, not the select few". [17303851] BMJ 334(7589): 330 (2007)
2007 838	Should we ditch impact factors? [17363827] BMJ 334(7593): 568 (2007)
2007 839	Should we ditch impact factors? [17363828] BMJ 334(7593): 569 (2007)
2005 840	Open access, impact, and demand. [15891208] BMJ 330(7500): 1097-8 (2005)
2005 841	Perceptions of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. [15677363] BMJ 330(7494): 756 (2005)
2008 842	Ditching impact factors: Time for the single researcher impact factor. [18403509] BMJ 336(7648): 789 (2008)
2008 843	Double blind peer reviews are fairer and more objective, say academics. [18244991] BMJ 336(7638): 241 (2008)
2008 844	Double blind peer review: Response rate was only 7.7%. [18276690] BMJ 336(7640): 346 (2008)
2004 845	How to write an abstract that will be accepted for presentation at a national meeting. [15447804] Respir Care 49(10): 1206-12 (2004)
2004 846	How to make an effective poster. [15447805] Respir Care 49(10): 1213-6 (2004)
2004 847	How to present, summarize, and defend your poster at the meeting. [15447806] Respir Care 49(10): 1217-21 (2004)
2004 848	Anatomy of a research paper. [15447807] Respir Care 49(10): 1222-8 (2004)
2004 849	Effective use of tables and figures in abstracts, presentations, and papers. [15447809] Respir Care 49(10): 1233-7 (2004)
2004 850	The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication. [15447812] Respir Care 49(10): 1246-52 (2004)
2009 851	How to read a review paper. [19796419] Respir Care 54(10): 1379-85 (2009)
2009 852	How to read a scientific research paper. [19796417] Respir Care 54(10): 1366-71 (2009)
2010 853	Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends. [20884825] Mayo Clin Proc 85(10): 920-7 (2010)
2006 854	NIH funding of the independent investigator. [16990450] Physiology (Bethesda) 21(-): 300-1 (2006)
2003 855	Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews. [12533194] BMC Health Serv Res 3(1): 2 (2003)
2004 856	The importance of references to a peer reviewed article. [15532879] Can Vet J 45(10): 803-4 (2004)
2003 857	Electronic archiving with PubMed Central--next steps into the future. [12650038] Can Vet J 44(2): 101-2 (2003)
2009 858	Preparing effective grant applications. [20026793] Circulation 120(25): 2607-12 (2009)
2009 859	Funding opportunities for investigators in the early stages of career development. [19273733] Circulation 119(9): 1320-7 (2009)
2009 860	Choosing a research project and a research mentor. [19349336] Circulation 119(13): 1832-5 (2009)
2009 861	Manuscript preparation and publication. [19738151] Circulation 120(10): 906-13 (2009)
2010 862	Changes in the ethos of medical publications as reflected in progressive alterations in the uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals (1979-2008). [20525661] Chest 137(6): 1479-82 (2010)
2002 863	The potentially coercive nature of some clinical research trial acronyms. [12065371] Chest 121(6): 2023-8 (2002)
2010 864	Reporting a systematic review. [20442127] Chest 137(5): 1240-6 (2010)
2009 865	Handling manuscript rejection: insights from evidence and experience. [19201723] Chest 135(2): 573-7 (2009)
2009 866	Update on Registration of Clinical Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov. [19584213] Chest 136(1): 304-5 (2009)
2009 867	Reporting "basic results" in ClinicalTrials.gov. [19584212] Chest 136(1): 295-303 (2009)
2009 868	The role of conflict of interest in reporting of scientific information. [19584207] Chest 136(1): 253-9 (2009)
2008 869	Do radiology and other health care presentations posted on the Internet contain accessible protected health information? [18796683] Radiology 249(1): 285-93 (2008)
2004 870	Non-profit publishing: open access and the end of copyright transfer. [14657267] J Cell Sci 117(Pt 1): 1 (2004)
2008 871	The end of peer review and traditional publishing as we know it. [19099017] Medscape J Med 10(11): 267 (2008)
2009 872	Open-access medical knowledge: where are we currently and where should we be going? [19295931] Medscape J Med 11(1): 10 (2009)
2008 873	Publication bias and the pharmaceutical industry: the case of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder. [19008973] Medscape J Med 10(9): 211 (2008)
2008 874	Responding to the American siege against continuing medical education. [18679550] Medscape J Med 10(6): 139 (2008)
2009 875	Effectiveness of strategies to encourage general practitioners to accept an offer of free access to online evidence-based information: a randomised controlled trial. [19840400] Implement Sci 4(-): 68 (2009)
2011 876	Enhancing discovery and saving money with MERIT. [21490403] J Clin Invest 121(4): 1226 (2011)
2005 877	Do you have NIH funding? Then read this. [15931367] J Clin Invest 115(6): 1392 (2005)
2002 878	Retinoic acid and limb regeneration--a personal view. [12455625] Int J Dev Biol 46(7): 883-6 (2002)
2006 879	The success (or not) of HUGO nomenclature. [16707004] Genome Biol 7(5): 402 (2006)
2010 880	The usefulness of peer review for selecting manuscripts for publication: a utility analysis taking as an example a high-impact journal. [20596540] PLoS One 5(6): e11344 (2010)
2011 881	Peer review, program officers and science funding. [21533268] PLoS One 6(4): e18680 (2011)
2011 882	Perceptions of conflict of interest disclosures among peer reviewers. [22073216] PLoS One 6(11): e26900 (2011)
2011 883	From QUOROM to PRISMA: A Survey of High-Impact Medical Journals' Instructions to Authors and a Review of Systematic Reviews in Anesthesia Literature. [22110690] PLoS One 6(11): e27611 (2011)
2011 884	Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review. [22039406] PLoS One 6(10): e25153 (2011)
2011 885	On the lack of consensus over the meaning of openness: an empirical study. [21858110] PLoS One 6(8): e23420 (2011)
2011 886	An empirical analysis of overlap publication in Chinese language and English research manuscripts. [21765946] PLoS One 6(7): e22149 (2011)
2011 887	The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal. [21799867] PLoS One 6(7): e22475 (2011)
2011 888	The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. [21695139] PLoS One 6(6): e20961 (2011)
2011 889	A propaganda index for reviewing problem framing in articles and manuscripts: an exploratory study. [21647426] PLoS One 6(5): e19516 (2011)
2010 890	Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics. [20976226] PLoS One 5(10): e13345 (2010)
2010 891	Citability of original research and reviews in journals and their sponsored supplements. [20352048] PLoS One 5(3): e9876 (2010)
2010 892	The promise and perils of pre-publication review: a multi-agent simulation of biomedical discovery under varying levels of review stringency. [20520812] PLoS One 5(5): e10782 (2010)
2009 893	Systematic differences in impact across publication tracks at PNAS. [19956649] PLoS One 4(12): e8092 (2009)
2007 894	Inflated impact factors? The true impact of evolutionary papers in non-evolutionary journals. [17912376] PLoS One 2(10): e999 (2007)
2007 895	Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial. [17389922] PLoS One 2(3): e332 (2007)
2009 896	How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. [19478950] PLoS One 4(5): e5738 (2009)
2009 897	Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. [19956596] PLoS One 4(11): e7824 (2009)
2009 898	Quality of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals: a systematic review. [19623259] PLoS One 4(7): e6350 (2009)
2009 899	Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior? [19621085] PLoS One 4(7): e6283 (2009)
2006 900	Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion. [16954351] J Cell Biol 174(6): 741 (2006)
2003 901	Proposed legislation supports an untested publishing model. [12843207] J Cell Biol 162(2): 171-2 (2003)
2005 902	The NIH policy on enhancing public access to publications resulting from NIH-funded research: can we streamline the process for our authors? [15795313] J Cell Biol 168(7): 991-8 (2005)
2008 903	You wrote it; you own it! [18450642] J Cell Biol 181(3): 405-6 (2008)
2010 904	Sustainable digital infrastructure. Although databases and other online resources have become a central tool for biological research, their long-term support and maintenance is far from secure. [20847740] EMBO Rep 11(10): 730-4 (2010)
2004 905	Open access and closed options. [15459740] EMBO Rep 5(10): 921 (2004)
2007 906	How many scientific papers should be retracted? [17471252] EMBO Rep 8(5): 422-3 (2007)
2008 907	Access evolved? Versatile open access policies are evolving together with scholarly information, but copyright issues remain unsettled. [18379582] EMBO Rep 9(4): 317-21 (2008)
2008 908	An open challenge. Open access and the challenges for scientific publishing. [18451762] EMBO Rep 9(5): 404-8 (2008)
2006 909	Science fraud: from patchwork mouse to patchwork data. [16581962] FASEB J 20(6): 587-90 (2006)
2010 910	Experimental errors: Paul Bert and the Alabama tenure killings. [20430795] FASEB J 24(5): 1297-300 (2010)
2008 911	Writing science: the abstract is poetry, the paper is prose. [18676405] FASEB J 22(8): 2601-4 (2008)
2007 912	Publish or perish: letter to a young contributor. [17329598] FASEB J 21(3): 631-4 (2007)
2009 913	Walter Benjamin and Biz Stone: the scientific paper in the Age of Twitter. [19567372] FASEB J 23(7): 2015-8 (2009)
2008 914	How we do business (or, Why does it take other journals so long to review your paper?). [18552552] Autophagy 4(5): 551-4 (2008)
2011 915	Retraction expansion? [21988683] Biotechniques 51(4): 219 (2011)
2010 916	Patients, patience, and the publication process. [20798042] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(36): 15661 (2010)
2010 917	Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations. [20805513] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(37): 16023-7 (2010)
2004 918	Results of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication. [14762162] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(5): 1111 (2004)
2003 919	Webcasting is not publication. [12851455] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14): 8039 (2003)
2005 920	Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies. [15809413] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(15): 5303 (2005)
2009 921	The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. [19380731] Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(17): 6883-4 (2009)
2010 922	Self-citation in publishing. [20665140] Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(10): 2803-7 (2010)
2008 923	Editorial : thoughts on authorship. [18278541] Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(4): 1002-5 (2008)
2009 924	Preparation of manuscripts for publication: improving your chances for success. [19460835] Clin Chem 55(7): 1259-64 (2009)
2008 925	Identifying duplicate publications: primum non nocere. [18285397] Clin Chem 54(5): 777-8 (2008)
2002 926	Reviewing the reviewers: the vague accountability of research ethics committees. [11983036] Crit Care 6(2): 121-2 (2002)
2004 927	Public access to biomedical research. [15385662] N Engl J Med 351(13): 1343 (2004)
2008 928	Peer review in the balance. [18499571] N Engl J Med 358(21): 2276-7 (2008)
2008 929	Selective publication of antidepressant trials. [18480215] N Engl J Med 358(20): 2180-1; author reply 2181-2 (2008)
2010 930	Former senior editor at The Lancet cries foul over firing for "gross misconduct". [20584939] CMAJ 182(11): E503-4 (2010)
2011 931	The association between a journal's source of revenue and the drug recommendations made in the articles it publishes. [21398223] CMAJ 183(5): 544-8 (2011)
2011 932	No favour, no friends: parsing the qualifications for a journal's editor-in-chief. [21324844] CMAJ 183(4): 415-6 (2011)
2011 933	Shedding light on retractions. [21444620] CMAJ 183(7): E385-6 (2011)
2011 934	Clinical guideline writers often conflicted. [21220450] CMAJ 183(3): E139-40 (2011)
2005 935	Open access in medical publishing: trends and countertrends. [15655217] CMAJ 172(2): 149, 151 (2005)
2010 936	Rethinking peer review. [20176769] CMAJ 182(3): 281 (2010)
2009 937	Croatian court vindicates journal editor. [19752090] CMAJ 181(8): E155-6 (2009)
2004 938	Managing allegations of scientific misconduct and fraud: lessons from the "Hall affair". [14960130] Med J Aust 180(4): 149-51 (2004)
2007 939	Publishing in peer review journals--criteria for success. [17619676] Aust Fam Physician 36(7): 561-2 (2007)
2010 940	Writing a letter to the Editor. [20730391] Singapore Med J 51(7): 532-5 (2010)
2010 941	Writing a book review. [20938606] Singapore Med J 51(9): 685-8 (2010)
2010 942	Conflict-of-interest, copyright and other declarations. [21140108] Singapore Med J 51(11): 844-6; quiz 847 (2010)
2010 943	Writing an invited review. [20505903] Singapore Med J 51(4): 271-4 (2010)
2010 944	Writing a technical note. [20358146] Singapore Med J 51(2): 101-3; quiz 104 (2010)
2010 945	Writing a case report. [20200769] Singapore Med J 51(1): 10-3; quiz 14 (2010)
2009 946	Exploring new frontiers of electronic publishing in biomedical science. [19352562] Singapore Med J 50(3): 230-4 (2009)
2009 947	Preparing effective illustrations. Part 2: photographs, images and diagrams. [19421674] Singapore Med J 50(4): 330-4; quiz 335 (2009)
2009 948	Is the journal impact factor a valid indicator of scientific value? [19710968] Singapore Med J 50(8): 749-51 (2009)
2009 949	Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse. [19710969] Singapore Med J 50(8): 752-5 (2009)
2009 950	Dealing with returned manuscripts. [19960157] Singapore Med J 50(11): 1050-2; quiz 1053 (2009)
2009 951	Nurturing young writers: sustaining quality, not quantity. [19960155] Singapore Med J 50(11): 1044-7 (2009)
2009 952	Role of the manuscript reviewer. [19907880] Singapore Med J 50(10): 931-3; quiz 934 (2009)
2005 953	How to write a medical paper to get it published in a good journal. [16614658] MedGenMed 7(4): 36 (2005)
2004 954	Should the unpublished results of clinical trials be available to other researchers and physicians? [15520659] MedGenMed 6(3): 35 (2004)
2005 955	Open access medical publishing is finally coming alive. [16369281] MedGenMed 7(3): 55 (2005)
2002 956	Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: two randomized trials. [12038910] JAMA 287(21): 2781-3 (2002)
2011 957	Relating patenting and peer-review publications: an extended perspective on the vascular health and risk management literature. [21603595] Vasc Health Risk Manag 7(-): 265-72 (2011)
2010 958	Classification of journals in the QUALIS System of CAPES: urgent need of changing the criteria! [20209299] J Bras Pneumol 36(1): 1-3 (2010)
2008 959	H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals. [19035541] Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(7): 843-5 (2008)
2010 960	n-index: a novel and easily-calculable parameter for comparison of researchers working in different scientific fields. [20445291] Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 76(3): 229-30 (2010)
2010 961	Duplicate publication: what an editor can do? [20228537] Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 76(2): 99-102 (2010)
2008 962	Guidelines for writing a research project synopsis or protocol. [19172017] Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 74(6): 687-90 (2008)
2004 963	Ghostwriters for doctoral thesis. [15116811] Scand J Surg 93(1): 3 (2004)
2009 964	The Impact Factor. [20088103] Scand J Surg 98(3): 134 (2009)
2008 965	Promise and pitfalls of extending Google's PageRank algorithm to citation networks. [18971452] J Neurosci 28(44): 11103-5 (2008)
2003 966	The availability of original data and statistics: an improvement in good publication practice. [14614199] JOP 4(6): 193-9 (2003)
2009 967	Impact factor and its role in academic promotion: a statement adopted by the International Respiratory Journal Editors Roundtable. [19679740] J Appl Physiol 107(4): 1005 (2009)
2004 968	Stable funding for open source software? [15606967] Brief Bioinform 5(4): 312 (2004)
2004 969	The level of non-citation of articles within a journal as a measure of quality: a comparison to the impact factor. [15169549] BMC Med Res Methodol 4(-): 14 (2004)
2003 970	More insight into the fate of biomedical meeting abstracts: a systematic review. [12854973] BMC Med Res Methodol 3(-): 12 (2003)
2008 971	Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing? [18237378] BMC Med Res Methodol 8(-): 3 (2008)
2004 972	The fate of abstracts: without publication, science is dead. [15124267] J Rheumatol 31(5): 1007; author reply 1007-8 (2004)
2010 973	Publication rate of abstracts of papers and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings. [20648260] J Med Libr Assoc 98(3): 250-5 (2010)
2006 974	A review of electronic journal acquisition, management, and use in health sciences libraries. [16404472] J Med Libr Assoc 94(1): 67-74 (2006)
2006 975	Developing a virtual community for health sciences library book selection: Doody's Core Titles. [16404471] J Med Libr Assoc 94(1): 61-6 (2006)
2006 976	The Medical Library Association's professional development program: a look back at the way ahead. [16404465] J Med Libr Assoc 94(1): 8-18 (2006)
2002 977	Agents, intermediaries, and journal licensing. [11838450] J Med Libr Assoc 90(1): 101-4 (2002)
2011 978	Reporting of article retractions in bibliographic databases and online journals. [21464856] J Med Libr Assoc 99(2): 164-7 (2011)
2011 979	Balancing between two goods: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and ethical compliancy considerations for privacy-sensitive materials in health sciences archival and historical special collections. [21243051] J Med Libr Assoc 99(1): 15-22 (2011)
2011 980	National Institutes of Health public access policy and the University of Michigan Libraries' role in assisting with depositing to PubMed Central. [21243064] J Med Libr Assoc 99(1): 97-9 (2011)
2011 981	Problems with e-books: suggestions for publishers. [21753907] J Med Libr Assoc 99(3): 181-2 (2011)
2011 982	The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research. [21753913] J Med Libr Assoc 99(3): 208-17 (2011)
2005 983	The status of open access publishing by academic societies. [16239934] J Med Libr Assoc 93(4): 423-4 (2005)
2004 984	Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature. [15088074] J Med Libr Assoc 92(2): 164-6 (2004)
2004 985	Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. [15098054] J Med Libr Assoc 92(2): 242-50 (2004)
2004 986	Embracing open access. [14762457] J Med Libr Assoc 92(1): 1-3 (2004)
2005 987	Proceedings, 104th Annual Meeting Medical Library Association, Inc., Washington, DC, May 21-26, 2004. [17219703] J Med Libr Assoc 93(1): 143-88 (2005)
2010 988	Non-biomedical sources for systematic reviews of pharmaceutical policy. [20098660] J Med Libr Assoc 98(1): 85-7 (2010)
2007 989	Expanding medical library support in response to the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy. [17971895] J Med Libr Assoc 95(4): 450-3 (2007)
2008 990	Citation patterns of online and print journals in the digital age. [18974814] J Med Libr Assoc 96(4): 362-9 (2008)
2009 991	The next generation of electronic journals: prospects and problems. [19851482] J Med Libr Assoc 97(4): 237 (2009)
2009 992	E-science and biomedical libraries. [19626139] J Med Libr Assoc 97(3): 159-61 (2009)
2006 993	Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. [16888657] J Med Libr Assoc 94(3): 253-62 (2006)
2008 994	How to succeed in science: a concise guide for young biomedical scientists. Part II: making discoveries. [18401347] Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9(6): 491-4 (2008)
2011 995	Further peer review failures. [22012059] Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66(10): 1833 (2011)
2010 996	Impact factor, Scimago Indexes and the Brazilian journal rating system: where do we go from here? [20454490] Clinics (Sao Paulo) 65(4): 351-5 (2010)
2010 997	Gene patents: a view from the clinical laboratory. [20214531] Expert Rev Mol Diagn 10(2): 123-5 (2010)
2004 998	Information access. NIH public access policy. [15591188] Science 306(5703): 1895 (2004)
2010 999	Improving access to research. [20093440] Science 327(5964): 393 (2010)
2010 1000	Science education web sites. [20110470] Science 327(5965): 504 (2010)
2009 1001	Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing. [19679805] Science 325(5942): 828-32 (2009)
2008 1002	Scientific publishing standards. [18772400] Science 321(5894): 1271 (2008)
2008 1003	The misused impact factor. [18845714] Science 322(5899): 165 (2008)
2008 1004	Dishonesty in medicine revisited. [18427644] Tex Heart Inst J 35(1): 6-15 (2008)
2010 1005	Fraud: just say no! [20028876] Endocrinology 151(1): 1-3 (2010)
2002 1006	Case reports, case series and systematic reviews. [11937645] QJM 95(4): 197-8 (2002)
2009 1007	The art and craft of medical writing: report on JPGM writecon 2009. [20083865] J Postgrad Med 55(4): 237-8 (2009)
2006 1008	Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well. [16672756] J R Soc Med 99(5): 232-7 (2006)
2006 1009	Scientific Journals are "faith based": is there science behind peer review? [17139057] J R Soc Med 99(12): 596-8 (2006)
2004 1010	Scoring posters at scientific meetings: first impressions count. [15229266] J R Soc Med 97(7): 340-1 (2004)
2007 1011	The vulnerability and limitations of impact factor in evaluating quality. [17682020] J R Soc Med 100(8): 354-5 (2007)
2011 1012	How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship--and how they should be revised. [21857808] PLoS Med 8(8): e1001072 (2011)
2011 1013	Ghostwriting revisited: new perspectives but few solutions in sight. [21912518] PLoS Med 8(8): e1001084 (2011)
2010 1014	Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. [21829330] PLoS Med 8(8): e1001069 (2010)
2011 1015	Promotional tone in reviews of menopausal hormone therapy after the Women's Health Initiative: an analysis of published articles. [21423581] PLoS Med 8(3): e1000425 (2011)
2011 1016	Strengthening the reporting of Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies: the GRIPS Statement. [21423587] PLoS Med 8(3): e1000420 (2011)
2011 1017	On the path to global open access: a few more miles to go. [21483705] PLoS Med 8(3): e1001014 (2011)
2007 1018	Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. [17388681] PLoS Med 4(3): e143; author reply e145 (2007)
2007 1019	Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality? [17388682] PLoS Med 4(3): e144; author reply e145 (2007)
2007 1020	Plagiarism - please don't copy. [17880356] Br J Clin Pharmacol 64(4): 403-5 (2007)
2008 1021	Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research. [18558004] BMC Med 6(-): 13 (2008)
2010 1022	Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia. [20941386] PLoS Comput Biol 6(9): - (2010)
2006 1023	Biocurators: contributors to the world of science. [17411327] PLoS Comput Biol 2(10): e142 (2006)
2006 1024	The biocurator: connecting and enhancing scientific data. [17069454] PLoS Comput Biol 2(10): e125 (2006)
2006 1025	A biocurator perspective: annotation at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank. [17069453] PLoS Comput Biol 2(10): e99 (2006)
2011 1026	Ten simple rules for building and maintaining a scientific reputation. [21738465] PLoS Comput Biol 7(6): e1002108 (2011)
2011 1027	Ten simple rules for getting ahead as a computational biologist in Academia. [21253560] PLoS Comput Biol 7(1): e1002001 (2011)
2005 1028	Ten simple rules for getting published. [16261197] PLoS Comput Biol 1(5): e57 (2005)
2008 1029	I am not a scientist, I am a number. [19112480] PLoS Comput Biol 4(12): e1000247 (2008)
2007 1030	Ten simple rules for a good poster presentation. [17530921] PLoS Comput Biol 3(5): e102 (2007)
2007 1031	Ten simple rules for doing your best research, according to Hamming. [17967054] PLoS Comput Biol 3(10): 1839-40 (2007)
2007 1032	The long and thorny road to publication in quality journals. [18166071] PLoS Comput Biol 3(12): e251 (2007)
2007 1033	Ten simple rules for making good oral presentations. [17500596] PLoS Comput Biol 3(4): e77 (2007)
2008 1034	Open access: taking full advantage of the content. [18369428] PLoS Comput Biol 4(3): e1000037 (2008)
2008 1035	Ten simple rules for organizing a scientific meeting. [18584020] PLoS Comput Biol 4(6): e1000080 (2008)
2002 1036	The underlying principles of scientific publication. [12424109] Bioinformatics 18(11): 1409 (2002)
2006 1037	It is time to end the patenting of software. [16766564] Bioinformatics 22(12): 1416-7 (2006)
2006 1038	Theory and reality for software patents: good in concept, not so good in practice. [16801635] Bioinformatics 22(13): 1543-5 (2006)
2008 1039	Jane: suggesting journals, finding experts. [18227119] Bioinformatics 24(5): 727-8 (2008)
2008 1040	Schizophrenia Bulletin and the revised NIH public access policy. [18644852] Schizophr Bull 34(5): 799-800 (2008)
2009 1041	Doctors who write literature may be considered to have crossed from science to the humanities obtaining release from the rigid constraints of logic, experiment and fact, and gaining the freedoms of imagination, metaphor and fiction. [19168453] Brain 132(Pt 1): 1-2 (2009)
2006 1042	Public health ethics and intellectual property policy. [16710535] Bull World Health Organ 84(5): 341 (2006)
2006 1043	Intellectual property and public health. [16710534] Bull World Health Organ 84(5): 340 (2006)
2006 1044	The impact of open access upon public health. [16710533] Bull World Health Organ 84(5): 339 (2006)
2006 1045	Public health, innovation and intellectual property rights: unfinished business. [16710532] Bull World Health Organ 84(5): 338 (2006)
2007 1046	Impact factors and consent to publish. [17513530] Emerg Med J 24(6): 384 (2007)
2010 1047	A commentary on the process of peer review and pathology data locking. [20237370] Toxicol Pathol 38(3): 508-10 (2010)
2008 1048	The promise of peer review. [19048063] Dis Model Mech 1(2-3): 73-7 (2008)
2010 1049	Partisan perspectives in the medical literature: a study of high frequency editorialists favoring hormone replacement therapy. [20425148] J Gen Intern Med 25(9): 914-9 (2010)
2005 1050	Scientific discourse, corporate ghostwriting, journal policy, and public trust. [15987334] J Gen Intern Med 20(6): 550-1 (2005)
2005 1051	Ghost writing initiated by commercial companies. [15987333] J Gen Intern Med 20(6): 549 (2005)
2005 1052	The corporate coauthor. [15987332] J Gen Intern Med 20(6): 546-8 (2005)
2005 1053	Response to "the corporate coauthor". [16050869] J Gen Intern Med 20(7): 672 (2005)
2011 1054	Common characteristics of open source software development and applicability for drug discovery: a systematic review. [21955914] Health Res Policy Syst 9(-): 36 (2011)
2007 1055	Denying open access to published health-care research: WHO has the password? [18079573] J Cancer Res Ther 3(3): 133-4 (2007)
2006 1056	Scientific fraud--real consequences. [16637464] J Am Dent Assoc 137(4): 428, 430 (2006)
2010 1057	Role of open chemical data in aiding drug discovery and design. [21426107] Future Med Chem 2(6): 903-7 (2010)
2011 1058	Novelty in chemical and pharmaceutical patents: a concise overview. [21446838] Future Med Chem 3(3): 253-5 (2011)
2011 1059	Determining an inventive step for chemical patents. [22023027] Future Med Chem 3(15): 1851-4 (2011)
2011 1060	The importance of patent sharing in neglected disease drug discovery. [21879838] Future Med Chem 3(11): 1331-4 (2011)
2011 1061	Experimental evidence to support a patent application: are in silico data enough? [21806371] Future Med Chem 3(9): 1089-92 (2011)
2009 1062	Sixty years of Pharmacological Reviews: has the role of review articles in biomedical sciences changed and, if so, how does this affect Pharmacological Reviews? [19549925] Pharmacol Rev 61(2): 115-8 (2009)
2009 1063	Authorship criteria and the role of reviewers and the editor. [19574689] Indian J Cancer 46(3): 254-5 (2009)
2010 1064	Relationships between authorship contributions and authors' industry financial ties among oncology clinical trials. [20065190] J Clin Oncol 28(8): 1316-21 (2010)
2010 1065	Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers. [20113465] Trials 11(-): 9 (2010)
2009 1066	Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data. [19296844] Trials 10(-): 17 (2009)
2008 1067	Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. [18423021] Trials 9(-): 20 (2008)
2009 1068	Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized? [19573242] Trials 10(-): 46 (2009)
2009 1069	Can you believe what you read in the papers? [19607671] Trials 10(-): 55 (2009)
2009 1070	A review of reporting of participant recruitment and retention in RCTs in six major journals. [19591685] Trials 10(-): 52 (2009)
2005 1071	The Journal as a provider of continuing medical education. [15951576] Hong Kong Med J 11(3): 144 (2005)
2010 1072	Ways to improve a journal's impact factor in the online publication era. [21104615] Diagn Interv Radiol 16(4): 255-6 (2010)
2011 1073	Patent law in dentistry: An overview. [22124055] Indian J Dent Res 22(4): 574-9 (2011)
2009 1074	Impact factor and other standardized measures of journal citation: a perspective. [19336866] Indian J Dent Res 20(1): 81-5 (2009)
2007 1075	CAPES publications portal: a decisive milepost in Brazilian scientific development providing sources of evidence for researchers, students and health professionals. [17992388] Sao Paulo Med J 125(4): 203-4 (2007)
2002 1076	Randomized trials of high-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer: fraud, the press and the data (or lessons learned in medical policy governing clinical research). [12053718] Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 113(-): 56-66; discussion 66-7 (2002)
2009 1077	The peer review process in health journals. [19936469] Cad Saude Publica 25(11): 2306-7 (2009)
2009 1078	Side effects of publish-or-perish pressure on graduate studies. [19851610] Cad Saude Publica 25(10): 2092 (2009)
2010 1079	Research mentor: a web-based resource supporting grantsmanship and scientific publication. [20852087] Clin Med Res 8(3-4): 173-5 (2010)
2011 1080	Ethical standards adopted by Brazilian journals of medical specialties. [21691688] Rev Assoc Med Bras 57(3): 264-8 (2011)
2011 1081	Diagnostic Pathology in 2010: the successes and perspectives of open access publication. [21214914] Diagn Pathol 6(-): 2 (2011)
2010 1082	On being editor of (Indian) medical journals: a steeple chase. [20413918] Indian J Ophthalmol 58(3): 187-8 (2010)
2010 1083	A new approach to publishing research papers in the Journal. [20529494] Br J Gen Pract 60(575): 402 (2010)
2009 1084	Peer review under review: room for improvement? [19484152] Neth Heart J 17(5): 187 (2009)
2007 1085	Quality in epidemiological research: should we be submitting papers before we have the results and submitting more hypothesis-generating research? [17875575] Int J Epidemiol 36(5): 940-3 (2007)
2009 1086	Fraudulent submissions. [19277650] Int Orthop 33(2): 299 (2009)
2007 1087	Authors' responsibilities: guidance for submission of manuscripts to medical journals. [17665080] Prim Care Respir J 16(4): 203-4 (2007)
2009 1088	Impact factor and its role in academic promotion. [19684996] Prim Care Respir J 18(3): 127 (2009)
2010 1089	Essential criteria for manuscript review. [20579431] Comp Med 60(3): 176 (2010)
2011 1090	The importance of the internet for medical societies. [21894403] Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 26(2): vi-vii (2011)
2009 1091	Journal impact factor: this editorial, academic and scientific influence. [20011871] Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 24(3): 273-8 (2009)
2006 1092	The open access advantage. [16867971] J Med Internet Res 8(2): e8 (2006)
2004 1093	Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals. [15471763] J Med Internet Res 6(3): e37 (2004)
2004 1094	Impact factor: use and abuse. [14997230] Cardiovasc J S Afr 15(1): 5-7 (2004)
2009 1095	Peer review: Heart and soul of scientific publication. [19753172] Indian J Orthop 43(1): 3-5 (2009)
2004 1096	Changing ethical standards in scientific publication. [15446513] J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(7): 937-8 (2004)
2010 1097	A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of reports of clinical trials published in six Brazilian dental journals indexed in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO). [20485919] J Appl Oral Sci 18(2): 104-9 (2010)
2004 1098	Role of journals in addressing scientific misconduct. [15132163] Croat Med J 45(1): 104-6 (2004)
2008 1099	Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, visits Croatia to support the Croatian Medical Journal. [18581622] Croat Med J 49(3): 422 (2008)
2008 1100	Editor's note: plagiarism. [18923088] J Dent Educ 72(10): 1099 (2008)
2008 1101	Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective. [18426315] Arch Iran Med 11(3): 257-62 (2008)
2009 1102	Fraud and dishonesty in "scientific" publication. [19111022] Arch Iran Med 12(1): 1-4 (2009)
2007 1103	Scientific misconduct and medical publishing. [19727364] Ann Thorac Med 2(4): 147 (2007)
2007 1104	Ethics of open access to biomedical research: just a special case of ethics of open access to research. [18067660] Philos Ethics Humanit Med 2(-): 31 (2007)
2009 1105	The problem of recovering information due to the variability of authorship registration in scientific articles. [19551264] Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 17(2): 141-2, 143-4, 145-6 (2009)
2010 1106	Keep it simple: study design nomenclature in research article abstracts. [20446832] J Athl Train 45(3): 213-4 (2010)
2010 1107	Tools for multi-media presentations and publications. [20706858] J Digit Imaging 23(5): 644-5 (2010)
2003 1108	Editorial: Reviewing manuscripts with Manuscript Central. [14991508] J Digit Imaging 16(4): 319-23 (2003)
2010 1109	Lithium, trifluperazine and idiopathic leucopenia: Author and reviewer perspectives on how to write a good case report. [20838509] Indian J Psychiatry 52(2): 187-90 (2010)
2002 1110	Editorial independence is built on trust and communication. [12217064] Aust J Physiother 48(3): 167-8 (2002)
2002 1111	Editorial independence - essential to the integrity of the Journal. (Comment on Van Der Weyden MB, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 48: 167-168). [12443529] Aust J Physiother 48(4): 314-5 (2002)
2003 1112	Fraud and misconduct in publication. [12663346] Br J Sports Med 37(2): 95 (2003)
2011 1113	Plagiarism in scientific publication. [21537636] Braz Oral Res 25(2): 101 (2011)
2010 1114	Change the QUALIS criteria! [20658028] Braz Oral Res 24(2): 131-3 (2010)
2010 1115	Classification of journals in the QUALIS System of CAPES--urgent need of changing the criteria! [20339706] Braz Oral Res 24(1): 3-6 (2010)
2002 1116	Research misconduct. [11906974] Fam Pract 19(2): 123-4 (2002)
2004 1117	Open access. A turning point in scientific publication. [15492929] Int Microbiol 7(3): 157-61 (2004)
2006 1118	The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. [16835844] Int Microbiol 9(2): 135-8 (2006)
2010 1119	How to become a competent medical writer? [21829780] Perspect Clin Res 1(1): 33-7 (2010)
2005 1120	Open access publication is growing in importance. [17549129] J Can Chiropr Assoc 49(3): 141-5 (2005)
2011 1121	A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication. [21527007] J Orthop Surg Res 6(-): 19 (2011)
2005 1122	Fraud and other misconduct in biomedical research. [16143804] Neurocirugia (Astur) 16(4): 297-300 (2005)
2010 1123	Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals. [20740129] Perm J 14(1): 32-40 (2010)
2011 1124	Authors, editors, and the signs, symptoms and causes of plagiarism. [21957412] Saudi J Anaesth 5(3): 303-7 (2011)
2004 1125	How to write a research paper. [15218279] Cerebrovasc Dis 18(2): 135-8 (2004)
2011 1126	Going beyond the textbook: The need to integrate open access primary literature into the Chemistry curriculum. [21470429] Chem Cent J 5(-): 18 (2011)
2009 1127	The joy of reviewing: a short guide to writing book and media reviews. [19582634] Fam Med 41(7): 492-3 (2009)
2004 1128	Open access: whatever you may think, it works. [15162603] Fam Pract Manag 11(5): 17 (2004)
2004 1129	A simple method for evaluating the clinical literature. [15162611] Fam Pract Manag 11(5): 47-52 (2004)
2011 1130	PubMed Central Inclusion, Quertle Indexing, Outbound Reference Linking, and Editorial Board Successions: Encouraging Developments in the IJTMB's Evolution. [21589688] Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 4(1): 1-2 (2011)
2010 1131	How to write an ICS/IUGA conference abstract. [20179902] Int Urogynecol J 21(5): 509-13 (2010)
2010 1132	Publishing a master's thesis: a guide for novice authors. [20076994] J Genet Couns 19(3): 217-27 (2010)
2010 1133	The reality of open access and the search for financial stability. [21180861] Rev Bras Fisioter 14(5): 7-8 (2010)
2011 1134	To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript. [21477574] Rev Port Pneumol 17(2): 96-103 (2011)
2009 1135	The impact of the impact factor. [19222878] Can J Urol 16(1): 4445-6 (2009)
2010 1136	Research coordinators' experiences with scientific misconduct and research integrity. [20010045] Nurs Res 59(1): 51-7 (2010)
2009 1137	Open Science: tools, approaches, and implications. [19209729] Pac Symp Biocomput -(-): 540-4 (2009)
2002 1138	Patent or perish? An ethical approach to patenting human genes and proteins. [12629501] Pharmacogenomics J 2(6): 361-6 (2002)
2010 1139	The impact of article titles on citation hits: an analysis of general and specialist medical journals. [21103094] JRSM Short Rep 1(1): 2 (2010)
2011 1140	Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions. [21477335] BMC Pediatr 11(-): 27 (2011)
2011 1141	Nine criteria for a measure of scientific output. [22102840] Front Comput Neurosci 5(-): 48 (2011)
2007 1142	Misconduct by researchers and authors. [18001665] Gac Sanit 21(6): 492-9 (2007)
2011 1143	More powerful search engine invalidates anonymity guidelines for case reports. [21818461] Healthc Inform Res 17(1): 87-8 (2011)
2010 1144	How to write a scholarly book review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal: a review of the literature. [20480015] J Chiropr Educ 24(1): 57-69 (2010)
2010 1145	Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. [21350617] J Pharmacol Pharmacother 1(2): 94-9 (2010)
2009 1146	Blacklisting among scientists. [19253401] Synapse 63(7): 539-40 (2009)
2010 1147	How reliable are scientific studies? [20884944] Br J Psychiatry 197(4): 257-8 (2010)
2003 1148	Good practice in publication of clinical trial results. [14594933] Br J Psychiatry 183(-): 464-5 (2003)
2011 1149	Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles. [21909330] Front Psychol 2(-): 196 (2011)
2007 1150	Impact factor? Shmimpact factor!: the journal impact factor, modern day literature searching, and the publication process. [20806031] Psychiatry (Edgmont) 4(5): 54-7 (2007)
2006 1151	Unpleasant surprises: how the Introduction has wandered into the Discussion. [16940171] J Exp Med 203(9): 2043 (2006)
2008 1152	You wrote it; you own it! [18450643] J Exp Med 205(5): 996-7 (2008)
2004 1153	Open Access gains attention in scholar communication. [15350204] Mol Cancer 3(-): 23 (2004)
2008 1154	To know or not to know: archiving and the under-appreciated historical value of data. [18267017] Mol Cancer 7(-): 18 (2008)
2005 1155	Towards open access. [15932651] Mol Cancer 4(1): 20 (2005)
2008 1156	The publishing game: reflections of an editorial team. [19020521] Lab Invest 88(12): 1258-63 (2008)
2010 1157	What editors want in an abstract. [20038944] Lab Invest 90(1): 4-5 (2010)
2007 1158	The impact of review articles. [17952095] Lab Invest 87(12): 1174-85 (2007)
2010 1159	10 years of Malaria Journal: how did Open Access change publication patterns? [20946649] Malar J 9(-): 284 (2010)
2011 1160	Openness as infrastructure. [21999327] J Cheminform 3(1): 36 (2011)
2011 1161	Adventures in public data. [22017861] J Cheminform 3(-): 34 (2011)
2005 1162	Comments on the NIH enhanced public access policy. [16157520] J Histochem Cytochem 53(9): 1041 (2005)
2007 1163	Publish and perish: the future fate of not-for-profit society-sponsored journals? [17875660] J Histochem Cytochem 55(10): 981-2 (2007)
2009 1164	Plagiarism in scientific publications. [19749442] J Infect Dev Ctries 3(1): 1-4 (2009)
2006 1165	Open access increases citation rate. [16683866] PLoS Biol 4(5): e176 (2006)
2010 1166	Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. [20361022] PLoS Biol 8(3): e1000344 (2010)
2005 1167	Opening access to cell biology. [17593892] PLoS Biol 3(12): e426 (2005)
2004 1168	Who pays for open access? [15094807] PLoS Biol 2(4): E105 (2004)
2004 1169	Open access and scientific societies. [15138514] PLoS Biol 2(5): E156 (2004)
2004 1170	Whose copy? Whose rights? [15252465] PLoS Biol 2(7): E228 (2004)
2003 1171	The what and whys of DOIs. [14624257] PLoS Biol 1(2): E57 (2003)
2007 1172	When is open access not open access? [17941723] PLoS Biol 5(10): e285 (2007)
2007 1173	An incentive solution to the peer review problem. [17439298] PLoS Biol 5(4): e107 (2007)
2007 1174	Open access to research is in the public interest. [17298181] PLoS Biol 5(2): e48 (2007)
2009 1175	Equity for open-access journal publishing. [19652697] PLoS Biol 7(8): e1000165 (2009)
2008 1176	Progress toward public access to science. [18399723] PLoS Biol 6(4): e101 (2008)
2008 1177	PLoS Biology at 5: the future is open access. [18959486] PLoS Biol 6(10): e267 (2008)
2005 1178	Measures of impact. [17523263] PLoS Biol 3(8): e296 (2005)
2009 1179	Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. [19918558] PLoS Biol 7(11): e1000242 (2009)
2009 1180	Duplicate publication--An unacceptable practice. [19211512] Poult Sci 88(3): 455 (2009)
2008 1181	The peer-review process. [18079442] Poult Sci 87(1): 1-2 (2008)
2008 1182	Open access--a case for intellectual honesty. [18492985] Poult Sci 87(6): 1003-4 (2008)
2009 1183	Output or impact: what should we be evaluating in research programs? [19834071] Poult Sci 88(11): 2243 (2009)
2008 1184	Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct. [18417753] J Anim Sci 86(5): 1035 (2008)
2007 1185	Open access in the biomedical field: a unique opportunity for researchers (and research itself). [17589413] Eura Medicophys 43(2): 203-13 (2007)
2011 1186	Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review). [21357757] Mol Biol Cell 22(5): 525-7 (2011)
2008 1187	CytoJournal's move to the new platform: More on financial model to the support open-access charter in cytopathology, publication quality indicators, and other issues. [19495401] Cytojournal 5(-): 15 (2008)
2009 1188	CJEM and pharmaceutical advertisements: it's time for an end. [19594978] CJEM 11(4): 375-84 (2009)
2011 1189	How to write your first research paper. [21966034] Yale J Biol Med 84(3): 181-90 (2011)
2010 1190	Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication. [21098168] AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(6): W382-7 (2010)
2010 1191	Policy and procedures on scientific misconduct. [21076476] Cell Death Differ 17(12): 1805-6 (2010)
2010 1192	Public access to publicly funded research: how and why mandatory policies by funders? [21224792] Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 46(4): 603-7 (2010)
2010 1193	Ethics code for professional medical writers emphasises transparency and completeness of research reporting. [21147749] BMJ 341(): c7025 (2010)
2010 1194	The rules of retraction. [21138994] BMJ 341(): c6985 (2010)
2010 1195	Revisiting Information Technology tools serving authorship and editorship: a case-guided tutorial to statistical analysis and plagiarism detection. [21487489] Hippokratia 14(Suppl 1): 38-48 (2010)
2010 1196	Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. [21487485] Hippokratia 14(Suppl 1): 5-12 (2010)
2010 1197	Science, institutional archives and open access: an overview and a pilot survey on the Italian cancer research institutions. [21172002] J Exp Clin Cancer Res 29(): 168 (2010)
2010 1198	The art of writing science. [20954234] Protein Sci 19(12): 2261-6 (2010)
2010 1199	Publication ethics and scientific misconduct. [21221494] Singapore Med J 51(12): 908-12 (2010)

Downloaded from http://www.kidney.de - The Database of Free Medical Reviews - The Metatextbook of Medicine - Ossip Groth

All Medline data shown were primarily retrieved from MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function mysql_connect() in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Publication issues.php:92 Stack trace: #0 {main} thrown in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\bdom\Publication issues.php on line 92