Warning: Undefined variable $zfal in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 525
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 530
 free
Warning: Undefined variable $sterm in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\mlpefetch.php on line 531
 free
 free
 
English Wikipedia
Nephropedia Template TP (
Twit Text
DeepDyve
Pubget Overpricing |  
lüll
Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors knowledge and perceptions Schroter S; Tite LJ R Soc Med 2006[Mar]; 99 (3): 141-8OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess journal authors' current knowledge and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. DESIGN: An electronic survey. SETTING: Authors of research papers submitted to BMJ, Archives of Disease in Childhood, and Journal of Medical Genetics in 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Familiarity with and perceptions of open access and author-pays publishing. RESULTS: 468/1113 (42%) responded. Prior to definitions being provided, 47% (222/468) and 38% (176/468) reported they were familiar with the terms "open access" and "author-pays" publishing, respectively. Some who did not at first recognize the terms, did claim to recognize them when they were defined. Only 10% (49/468) had submitted to an author-pays journal. Compared with non-open access subscription-based journals, 35% agreed that open access author-pays journals have a greater capacity to publish more content making it easier to get published, 27% thought they had lower impact factors, 31% thought they had faster and more timely publications, and 46% agreed that people will think anyone can pay to get published. 55% (256/468) thought they would not continue to submit to their respective journal if it became open access and charged, largely because of the reputation of the journals. Half (54%, 255/468) said open access has "no impact" or was "low priority" in their submission decisions. Two-thirds (66%, 308/468) said they would prefer to submit to a non-open access subscription-based journal than an open access author-pays journal. Over half thought they would have to make a contribution or pay the full cost of an author charge (56%, 262/468). CONCLUSIONS: The survey yielded useful information about respondents' knowledge and perceptions of these publishing models. Authors have limited familiarity with the concept of open-access publishing and surrounding issues. Currently, open access policies have little impact on authors' decision of where to submit papers.|Adult[MESH]|Aged[MESH]|Aged, 80 and over[MESH]|Attitude of Health Personnel[MESH]|Authorship[MESH]|Costs and Cost Analysis[MESH]|Fees and Charges[MESH]|Female[MESH]|Humans[MESH]|Information Storage and Retrieval/economics/*methods[MESH]|Journalism, Medical[MESH]|Male[MESH]|Middle Aged[MESH]|Models, Economic[MESH]|Periodicals as Topic/economics/*supply & distribution[MESH]|Professional Competence/standards[MESH]|Publishing/economics/*supply & distribution[MESH]|Surveys and Questionnaires[MESH]|Terminology as Topic[MESH] |
