<form name="fn" action="" method="get">
<p style="font-family:corbel"><input TYPE="hidden" name="search" size="555" value ="C7686938/?report=reader"> <TABLE WIDTH=100% BORDER=0 BORDERCOLOR="#000000" CELLPADDING=4 CELLSPACING=0><TR VALIGN=TOP><TD WIDTH=50%><b><a href=http://www.moremed.org>Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.<br>Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !></a></b></TD><TD WIDTH=50%><b><a href=http://www.house-of-papers.com>A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences<br>Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.</a></b></TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH=100% BORDER=0 BORDERCOLOR="#000000" CELLPADDING=4 CELLSPACING=0><TR VALIGN=TOP><script type="text/javascript">
function something()
{
window.open(" http://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?type0%5B%5D=all&lookfor0%5B%5D=&type0%5B%5D=tit&lookfor0%5B%5D=Trans+thoracic+versus+trans+hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single+centre+case+series+&type0%5B%5D=aut&lookfor0%5B%5D=Baram&type0%5B%5D=subj&lookfor0%5B%5D=&type0%5B%5D=url&lookfor0%5B%5D=&offset=10&ling=0&ling=1&type0%5B%5D=country&lookfor0%5B%5D=&daterange=year&yearfrom=&yearto=&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&lookfor1%5B%5D=0001&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&type1%5B%5D=doctype&refid=dcadvde&join=AND&bool0%5B%5D=AND&bool1%5B%5D=OR ");
window.open(" http://oaister.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3ATrans+thoracic+versus+trans+hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single+centre+case+series++au%3ABaram&fq=x0%3Aartchap+%3E++&qt=advanced&dblist=239 ");
window.open(" http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/e_suche/oai-hu.php?resperpage=20&creator=Baram+&title=Trans+thoracic+versus+trans+hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single+centre+case+series+&subject=&description=&sprache=10&tag=1&monat=1&jahr=&etag=31&emonat=12&ejahr=&atag=1&amonat=1&ajahr=&servernr=77&sets=&type=&sortierart=asc&bedingung=1&eingabe=20&anfang=0 ");
}
</script>
<TD WIDTH=20%><h3><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/C7686938/?report=reader" if dysfunctional with my ressources use this dummy link for content><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/imgTRUMP.png" alt="suck abstract from ncbi" WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=480 BORDER=0></a></h3></TD><TD WIDTH=60%><TABLE WIDTH=100% BORDER=0 BORDERCOLOR="#000000" CELLPADDING=4 CELLSPACING=0><TR VALIGN=TOP><TD WIDTH=50%><br>10.1186/s43057-020-00035-y <br><br><a href=http://sci-hub.ren/10.1186/s43057-020-00035-y  target="_blank">http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s43057-020-00035-y </a><br><a href=http://scholar.google.de/scholar?as_q=Trans+thoracic+versus+trans+hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single+centre+case+series+&as_sauthors= target="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/gspf.jpg" alt="suck pdf from google scholar" WIDTH=400 HEIGHT=50 BORDER=0></a><br>C7686938/?report=reader!7686938!C7686938<br><a href=http://sm.kidney.de/epmc.php?ep=eu&pmid=C7686938&pmc=7686938&ti=Trans-thoracic%20versus%20trans-hiatal%20resection%20for%20oesophageal%20carcinoma:%20a%20retrospective%20comparative%20study%20of%20a%20single-centre%20case%20series%20 target="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/europmc1.jpg" alt="unlimited free pdf from europmcC7686938" WIDTH=250 HEIGHT=80 BORDER=0></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size="+4"><i> free</i></font><br><a href=http://sm.kidney.de/epmc.php?ep=us&pmid=C7686938&pmc=7686938&ti=Trans-thoracic%20versus%20trans-hiatal%20resection%20for%20oesophageal%20carcinoma:%20a%20retrospective%20comparative%20study%20of%20a%20single-centre%20case%20series%20 target="_blank"><IMG SRC="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:--www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov-corehtml-pmc-pmcgifs-pubmed-pmc.gif" alt="PDF from PMC" WIDTH=250 HEIGHT=50 BORDER=0></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size="+4"><i> free</i></font><br><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7686938/?report=classic"><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/pmchtml.jpg" alt="html from PMC" WIDTH=250 HEIGHT=50 BORDER=0></a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<font size="+4"><i> free</i></font><br><iframe src="http://www.kidney.de/popencheck.php?TA=ä-/-ä&DP=2020&MP=&VO=28&VI=1&PG=ä&PMID=C7686938" width="100%" height="100" frameborder="0" scrolling="auto"></iframe></TD><TD WIDTH=50%> <A href='https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of a single-centre case series http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kidney.de%2Fpget.php%3F%26tw%3D1%26pmid%3DC7686938+'><img src='http://www.kidney.de/images/twitter_bird_blue_48.png'></a><h3><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/C7686938/?report=reader" as long as pubmed is dysfunctional with my ressources use this dummy link for content><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/pubmedD.png" alt="suck abstract from ncbi" WIDTH=549 HEIGHT=200 BORDER=0></a></h3><img src="http://www.kidney.de/phplern/C7686938.jpg" alt="pmidC7686938" WIDTH=40 HEIGHT=40 BORDER=0"><br>Nephropedia Template TP <br><textarea id="code" style="width: 100%; height: 80px; font-weight: bold;" >{{tp|p=C7686938|t=2020. Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of a single-centre case series |pdf=|usr=}}</textarea><br>gab.com Text <br><textarea id="code" style="width: 100%; height: 20px" readonly>Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of a single-centre case series  JO: ä-/-ä http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=C7686938 #FOAvip Background: Oesophageal carcinoma (EC) is the eighth most common cancer. Surgery  is the cornerstone of management for resectable EC. Trans-thoracic oesophagectomy (TTE) and trans-hiatal oesophagectomy (THE) are the two most widely practised procedures. Most of the related controversies are centred on both early and late  post-operative complications and mortality (in terms of overall survival and cancer-free survival).This was a single-centre, retrospective, comparative study  analysing the outcomes of two EC resection methods. All 87 patients underwent surgery by the same surgical team over 13?years. Consequently, 87 oesophagectomies with curative intent were performed and divided into the TTE group (group A = 47) and the THE group (group B = 40). Results: The mean patient  age was 65.60 ± 6.30?years in the TTE group and 63.48 ± 9.34?years in the THE group. No significant difference was found in operative time, blood loss or duration of stay in the intensive care unit. The duration of hospital stay was significantly different between the THE and TTE groups (17.25 ± 5.92 vs. 12.93 ±  3.44, respectively; P ? 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in the TTE group (9/47, 19.14%) than in the THE group (5/40, 12.5%) (P = 0.400). The mean survival rate from our series showed the superiority of group A (TTE) (65.56?months) over  group B (THE) (45.01?months), with P = 0.146. Conclusion: No high level of evidence suggests the superiority of one surgical procedure over another. The THE procedure is less time-consuming concerning care and follow-up, and most patients were more satisfied and experienced less pain than with the TTE procedure. Both THE and TTE have comparable post-operative anastomotic complications, and they have no significant long-term survival differences.</textarea><br>Twit Text FOAVip<br><textarea id="code" style="width: 100%; height: 20px" readonly>Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of a single-centre case series 🦆🦆ä-/-ä http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=C7686938 #FOAvip </textarea><br>Twit Text #<br><textarea id="code" style="width: 100%; height: 80px" readonly>Free Paper on
# # # # #
LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=C7686938 #FOAvip</textarea><br>English Wikipedia<br><textarea id="code" style="width: 100%; height: 20px"; readonly><ref>{{Cite pmid|C7686938}}</ref></textarea><br></TD></TR></TABLE><br><li><b>Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma: a retrospective comparative study of a single-centre case series </b> #MMPMIDC7686938<li>Baram A; Sherzad H<li>ä-/-ä  2020[]; 28 (1): ä PMIDC7686938show ga

<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script><!-- resp --><ins class="adsbygoogle"     style="display:block"     data-ad-client="ca-pub-1196903969644470"     data-ad-slot="9810425356"     data-ad-format="auto"></ins><script>(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});</script><li>Background: Oesophageal carcinoma (EC) is the eighth most common cancer. Surgery  is the cornerstone of management for resectable EC. Trans-thoracic oesophagectomy (TTE) and trans-hiatal oesophagectomy (THE) are the two most widely practised procedures. Most of the related controversies are centred on both early and late  post-operative complications and mortality (in terms of overall survival and cancer-free survival).This was a single-centre, retrospective, comparative study  analysing the outcomes of two EC resection methods. All 87 patients underwent surgery by the same surgical team over 13?years. Consequently, 87 oesophagectomies with curative intent were performed and divided into the TTE group (group A = 47) and the THE group (group B = 40). Results: The mean patient  age was 65.60 ± 6.30?years in the TTE group and 63.48 ± 9.34?years in the THE group. No significant difference was found in operative time, blood loss or duration of stay in the intensive care unit. The duration of hospital stay was significantly different between the THE and TTE groups (17.25 ± 5.92 vs. 12.93 ±  3.44, respectively; P ? 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in the TTE group (9/47, 19.14%) than in the THE group (5/40, 12.5%) (P = 0.400). The mean survival rate from our series showed the superiority of group A (TTE) (65.56?months) over  group B (THE) (45.01?months), with P = 0.146. Conclusion: No high level of evidence suggests the superiority of one surgical procedure over another. The THE procedure is less time-consuming concerning care and follow-up, and most patients were more satisfied and experienced less pain than with the TTE procedure. Both THE and TTE have comparable post-operative anastomotic complications, and they have no significant long-term survival differences.<div id="disqus_thread"></div><script>       var disqus_config = function () {        this.page.url = "http://moremed.org/disqus.php?pmid=C7686938";          this.page.identifier = "C7686938";    };     (function() {         var d = document, s = d.createElement('script');              s.src = '//pmdisc.disqus.com/embed.js';         s.setAttribute('data-timestamp', +new Date());         (d.head || d.body).appendChild(s);     })(); </script><noscript>Please enable JavaScript to view the <a href="https://disqus.com/?ref_noscript" rel="nofollow">comments powered by Disqus.</a></noscript><li>ä<textarea name="Line" cols="80" rows="1" style='font-size: 12pt'>Trans-thoracic versus trans-hiatal resection for oesophageal carcinoma(epmc).pdf</textarea><br><a href=http://www.medpilot.de/app/search/search/1?TI=Trans+thoracic+versus+trans+hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single+centre+case+series+&AU=Baram+Aram;+Sherzad+Hiwa><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/openmedpilot.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT WIDTH=405 HEIGHT=31 BORDER=0></a><a href="http://www.medpilot.de/app/search/search/1?ZSTA=(ä-/-ä)"><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/openmedpilot.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT WIDTH=197 HEIGHT=31 BORDER=0></a><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/C7686938/?report=reader"><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/openpubmed.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT WIDTH=605 HEIGHT=31 BORDER=0></a><br><br><li><a href=http://www.deepdyve.com/search?query=Trans-thoracic+versus+trans-hiatal+resection+for+oesophageal+carcinoma:+a+retrospective+comparative+study+of+a+single-centre+case+series++Baram target="_blank">DeepDyve</a><br><li><a href=http://pubget.com/search?disable_thesaurus=true&term%5B1%5D=pmid&aq%5B1%5D=ähttp://pubget.com/search?disable_thesaurus=true&term%5B1%5D=pmid&aq%5B1%5D=ä target="_blank">Pubget Overpricing</a></TD><TD WIDTH=20%><P><h3><a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/C7686938/?report=reader" as long as pubmed is dysfunctional with my ressources use this dummy link for content><IMG SRC="http://www.kidney.de/images/imgBIDEN.png" alt="suck abstract from ncbi" WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=480 BORDER=0></a></h3></TD></TR></TABLE></p><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="//www.kidney.de/images/gp.jpg" />
</head><title>ä 1.28 2020</title><meta name="description" content="" /><body>
<!-- <script type="text/javascript">
# var adfly_id = 3621752;
# var adfly_advert = 'banner';
# var exclude_domains = ['kidney.de', 'yoursite.com',];
# </script>
# <script src="http://cdn.adf.ly/js/link-converter.js" type="text/javascript"></script>

#<div id="fb-root"></div>
#<script>(function(d, s, id) {
#  var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
#  if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
#  js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
#  js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/de_DE/all.js#xfbml=1";
#  fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
#}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script> -->
</body></html>