Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/pace.13987 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/pace.13987 C7323294!7323294!32543745     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 229.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Pacing+Clin+Electrophysiol 2020 ; 43 (8): 891-3 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32543745|t=2020. Low prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID?19 patients |pdf=|usr=}}{{32543745}} gab.com Text Low prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID 19 patients JO: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32543745 #FOAvip Background: No studies investigated the prevalence of arrhythmias among clinically?stable patients affected by COVID?19 infection. Methods: We assessed prevalence, type, and burden of arrhythmias, by a single?day snapshot in seven non?intensive COVID Units at a third?level center. Results: We enrolled 132 inhospital patients (mean age 65±14y; 66% males) newly diagnosed with COVID?19 infection. Arrhythmic episodes were detected in 12 patients (9%). In detail, 8 had atrial fibrillation, and 4 self?limiting supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. There were no cases of ventricular arrhythmias or new?onset atrioventricular blocks. In addition, we report no patients with QTc interval >450 ms. Conclusions: Our single?day snapshot survey suggests that the prevalence of arrhythmias among clinically stable COVID?19 patients is low. In particular, no life?threatening arrhythmic events occurred. Twit Text FOAVip Low prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID 19 patients ????Pacing Clin Electrophysiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32543745 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32543745 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32543745}}</ref> Low prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID?19 patients #MMPMID32543745 Sala S; Peretto G; De Luca G; Farina N; Campochiaro C; Tresoldi M; Dagna L; Zangrillo A; Gulletta S; Della Bella P Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2020[Aug]; 43 (8): 891-3 PMID32543745show ga Background: No studies investigated the prevalence of arrhythmias among clinically?stable patients affected by COVID?19 infection. Methods: We assessed prevalence, type, and burden of arrhythmias, by a single?day snapshot in seven non?intensive COVID Units at a third?level center. Results: We enrolled 132 inhospital patients (mean age 65±14y; 66% males) newly diagnosed with COVID?19 infection. Arrhythmic episodes were detected in 12 patients (9%). In detail, 8 had atrial fibrillation, and 4 self?limiting supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. There were no cases of ventricular arrhythmias or new?onset atrioventricular blocks. In addition, we report no patients with QTc interval >450 ms. Conclusions: Our single?day snapshot survey suggests that the prevalence of arrhythmias among clinically stable COVID?19 patients is low. In particular, no life?threatening arrhythmic events occurred. äLow prevalence of arrhythmias in clinically stable COVID?19 patients (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing