Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/1467-8322.12573 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/1467-8322.12573 C7301012!7301012!32572296     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Anthropol+Today 2020 ; 36 (3): 8-10 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=32572296|t=2020. Struggling for food in a time of crisis: Responsibility and paradox |pdf=|usr=}}{{32572296}} gab.com Text Struggling for food in a time of crisis: Responsibility and paradox JO: Anthropol Today http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32572296 #FOAvip Struggling for food in a time of crisis: responsibility and paradox. Responsibility is a useful lens through which to examine the current state of food poverty in the UK in the context of the Covid?19 crisis, noting that this concept contains several paradoxes. Currently, responsibility involves the voluntary sector, the food industry and the state, a situation which the author has been exploring for the last five years in an ethnographic study of food poverty and food aid in the UK. Food aid organizations, especially food banks, have mushroomed during the period of austerity. This reveals the first paradox: namely, that the existence of food banks conveys the message that ?something is being done?, but in actuality this is very far from being sufficient to meet the needs of either the ?old? or ?new? food insecure. The second paradox is that at the onset of the crisis, a government which had been responsible for inflicting austerity on the country for 10 years, dramatically reversed some of its policies. However, predictably, this did not change the situation vis?à?vis food insecurity. The third paradox is that the frequent rhetoric invoking the two world wars has not resulted in lessons being learned ? notably, the creation of a ministry to deal with food and rationing, as in the Second World War. The final paradox relates to Brexit and its likely deleterious effects on food security, particularly if no ?deal? is achieved with the European Union, as seems likely. The voluntary food aid sector, try as it may, cannot possibly assume responsibility for the long?standing and now hugely increased problems of food insecurity. That belongs to the state. Twit Text FOAVip Struggling for food in a time of crisis: Responsibility and paradox ????Anthropol Today http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32572296 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=32572296 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|32572296}}</ref> Struggling for food in a time of crisis: Responsibility and paradox #MMPMID32572296 CAPLAN P Anthropol Today 2020[Jun]; 36 (3): 8-10 PMID32572296show ga Struggling for food in a time of crisis: responsibility and paradox. Responsibility is a useful lens through which to examine the current state of food poverty in the UK in the context of the Covid?19 crisis, noting that this concept contains several paradoxes. Currently, responsibility involves the voluntary sector, the food industry and the state, a situation which the author has been exploring for the last five years in an ethnographic study of food poverty and food aid in the UK. Food aid organizations, especially food banks, have mushroomed during the period of austerity. This reveals the first paradox: namely, that the existence of food banks conveys the message that ?something is being done?, but in actuality this is very far from being sufficient to meet the needs of either the ?old? or ?new? food insecure. The second paradox is that at the onset of the crisis, a government which had been responsible for inflicting austerity on the country for 10 years, dramatically reversed some of its policies. However, predictably, this did not change the situation vis?à?vis food insecurity. The third paradox is that the frequent rhetoric invoking the two world wars has not resulted in lessons being learned ? notably, the creation of a ministry to deal with food and rationing, as in the Second World War. The final paradox relates to Brexit and its likely deleterious effects on food security, particularly if no ?deal? is achieved with the European Union, as seems likely. The voluntary food aid sector, try as it may, cannot possibly assume responsibility for the long?standing and now hugely increased problems of food insecurity. That belongs to the state. äStruggling for food in a time of crisis: Responsibility and paradox (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing