Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.psym.2020.05.018
suck pdf from google scholar
C7251405!7251405 !32943211
unlimited free pdf from europmc32943211
    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=32943211 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid32943211
      Psychosomatics 2020 ; 61 (6 ): 607-615
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature #MMPMID32943211
  • Cabrera MA ; Karamsetty L ; Simpson SA
  • Psychosomatics 2020[Nov]; 61 (6 ): 607-615 PMID32943211 show ga
  • BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic has changed health care rapidly and dramatically. OBJECTIVE: To provide a critical synthesis of the scientific literature on the pandemic's implications for psychiatric practice. METHODS: A rapid literature review was undertaken to identify scientific literature linking psychiatric outcomes and practice changes due to coronavirus and the disease it causes (COVID-19). A structured quality assessment was used to assess those articles reporting quantitative data. RESULTS: Fifty articles were identified for inclusion, but only 12 contained original data. Eleven of those twelve were rated as of weak quality. The literature described psychiatric sequelae of the coronavirus and related public health interventions through cross-sectional surveys among different populations; no studies include diagnostic or functional impairment data. Populations at risk include COVID-19 survivors, health care workers, the elderly, and those with preexisting psychiatric disease. Impacts on psychiatric practice were described, again without data on changes to quality or access of care. CONCLUSIONS: There is a quickly accumulating body of evidence on the psychiatric implications of coronavirus including psychological effects on the general public and at-risk subgroups. Similarly, psychiatric practice has witnessed substantial adaptation to the pandemic. However, there remain significant gaps in scientific knowledge. We suggest opportunities for consultation-liaison psychiatry to improve the understanding of the relationship between coronavirus and psychiatric care.
  • |*Coronavirus Infections [MESH]
  • |*Delivery of Health Care [MESH]
  • |*Pandemics [MESH]
  • |*Pneumonia, Viral [MESH]
  • |*Psychiatry [MESH]
  • |Anxiety/psychology [MESH]
  • |Betacoronavirus [MESH]
  • |COVID-19 [MESH]
  • |Depression/psychology [MESH]
  • |Health Personnel/psychology [MESH]
  • |Humans [MESH]
  • |Psychological Distress [MESH]
  • |SARS-CoV-2 [MESH]
  • |Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology [MESH]
  • |Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology [MESH]


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box