Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1148/ryct.2020200075

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1148/ryct.2020200075
suck pdf from google scholar
C7233442!7233442!33778562
unlimited free pdf from europmc33778562    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid33778562      Radiol+Cardiothorac+Imaging 2020 ; 2 (2): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Serial Quantitative Chest CT Assessment of COVID-19: A Deep Learning Approach #MMPMID33778562
  • Huang L; Han R; Ai T; Yu P; Kang H; Tao Q; Xia L
  • Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging 2020[Apr]; 2 (2): ä PMID33778562show ga
  • Purpose: To quantitatively evaluate lung burden changes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by using serial CT scan by an automated deep learning method. Materials and Methods: Patients with COVID-19, who underwent chest CT between January 1 and February 3, 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into mild, moderate, severe, and critical types, according to their baseline clinical, laboratory, and CT findings. CT lung opacification percentages of the whole lung and five lobes were automatically quantified by a commercial deep learning software and compared with those at follow-up CT scans. Longitudinal changes of the CT quantitative parameter were also compared among the four clinical types. Results: A total of 126 patients with COVID-19 (mean age, 52 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; 53.2% males) were evaluated, including six mild, 94 moderate, 20 severe, and six critical cases. CT-derived opacification percentage was significantly different among clinical groups at baseline, gradually progressing from mild to critical type (all P < .01). Overall, the whole-lung opacification percentage significantly increased from baseline CT to first follow-up CT (median [interquartile range]: 3.6% [0.5%, 12.1%] vs 8.7% [2.7%, 21.2%]; P < .01). No significant progression of the opacification percentages was noted from the first follow-up to second follow-up CT (8.7% [2.7%, 21.2%] vs 6.0% [1.9%, 24.3%]; P = .655). Conclusion: The quantification of lung opacification in COVID-19 measured at chest CT by using a commercially available deep learning?based tool was significantly different among groups with different clinical severity. This approach could potentially eliminate the subjectivity in the initial assessment and follow-up of pulmonary findings in COVID-19.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box