Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/clc.22568 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/clc.22568 C6053629!6053629 !27788301     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27788301 &cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 267.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27788301 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Clin+Cardiol 2016 ; 39 (10 ): 578-584 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27788301 |t=2016. Prasugrel Use Following PCI and Associated Patient Outcomes: Insights From the National VA CART Program |pdf=|usr=}}{{27788301 }} gab.com Text Prasugrel Use Following PCI and Associated Patient Outcomes: Insights From the National VA CART Program JO: Clin Cardiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27788301 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but it increases the risk of bleeding in subgroups of patients. There is limited data on whether prasugrel use in routine practice is targeted to clinical settings with greatest anticipated patient benefit. METHODS: In a national cohort of 11 617 veterans who underwent PCI between 2010 and 2013 at Veterans Administration hospitals nationwide, we assessed overall trends in the use of prasugrel and the frequency of prasugrel use in patients with contraindications (prior transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident), higher bleeding risk (age ?75 or weight <60 kg), and nonindicated settings (non-acute coronary syndrome [non-ACS]). We then evaluated the association between prasugrel use and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding rates. RESULTS: Overall, 1040 (9.0%) patients who received prasugrel after PCI were included. Prasugrel was infrequently used in contraindicated (2.4%) or higher-bleeding-risk (1.8%) settings. Additionally, 35.8% of patients received prasugrel in settings that lack evidence of clinical benefit (ie, non-ACS). Compared with clopidogrel, there were no significant differences in risk-adjusted mortality, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding outcomes with prasugrel therapy at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel use after PCI in the Veterans Administration is low and prasugrel was rarely used in contraindicated or high-bleeding-risk settings. However, a third of patients received prasugrel for off-label non-ACS indications that lack efficacy data. Twit Text FOAVip Prasugrel Use Following PCI and Associated Patient Outcomes: Insights From the National VA CART Program ????Clin Cardiol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27788301 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27788301 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27788301 }}</ref> Prasugrel Use Following PCI and Associated Patient Outcomes: Insights From the National VA CART Program #MMPMID27788301 Aggarwal V ; Armstrong EJ ; Liu W ; Maddox TM ; Ho PM ; Carey E ; Wang T ; Sherwood M ; Tsai TT ; Rumsfeld JS ; Bradley SM Clin Cardiol 2016[Oct]; 39 (10 ): 578-584 PMID27788301 show ga BACKGROUND: Prasugrel is more effective than clopidogrel in preventing thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), but it increases the risk of bleeding in subgroups of patients. There is limited data on whether prasugrel use in routine practice is targeted to clinical settings with greatest anticipated patient benefit. METHODS: In a national cohort of 11 617 veterans who underwent PCI between 2010 and 2013 at Veterans Administration hospitals nationwide, we assessed overall trends in the use of prasugrel and the frequency of prasugrel use in patients with contraindications (prior transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident), higher bleeding risk (age ?75 or weight <60 kg), and nonindicated settings (non-acute coronary syndrome [non-ACS]). We then evaluated the association between prasugrel use and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality, myocardial infarction, and major bleeding rates. RESULTS: Overall, 1040 (9.0%) patients who received prasugrel after PCI were included. Prasugrel was infrequently used in contraindicated (2.4%) or higher-bleeding-risk (1.8%) settings. Additionally, 35.8% of patients received prasugrel in settings that lack evidence of clinical benefit (ie, non-ACS). Compared with clopidogrel, there were no significant differences in risk-adjusted mortality, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding outcomes with prasugrel therapy at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel use after PCI in the Veterans Administration is low and prasugrel was rarely used in contraindicated or high-bleeding-risk settings. However, a third of patients received prasugrel for off-label non-ACS indications that lack efficacy data. |*Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects/mortality [MESH] |*United States Department of Veterans Affairs [MESH] |Aged [MESH] |Cohort Studies [MESH] |Coronary Thrombosis/etiology/prevention & control [MESH] |Databases, Factual [MESH] |Drug Utilization Review [MESH] |Female [MESH] |Hemorrhage/chemically induced [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Male [MESH] |Middle Aged [MESH] |Myocardial Infarction/etiology/prevention & control [MESH] |Off-Label Use [MESH] |Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects/*therapeutic use [MESH] |Practice Patterns, Physicians'/*trends [MESH] |Prasugrel Hydrochloride/adverse effects/*therapeutic use [MESH] |Risk Factors [MESH] |Time Factors [MESH] |Treatment Outcome [MESH] |United States [MESH]Prasugrel Use Following PCI and Associated Patient Outcomes: Insights (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing