Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.14366/usg.17029 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.14366/usg.17029 C6044217!6044217!29141286     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Ultrasonography 2018 ; 37 (3): 233-43 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29141286|t=2018. Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients |pdf=|usr=}}{{29141286}} gab.com Text Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients JO: Ultrasonography http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29141286 #FOAvip Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of secondary appendicitis (SA) and to discuss the differential findings compared with primary appendicitis. Methods: In this study, we analyzed the ultrasonographic findings of 94 patients under 15 years old of age treated at our institution from May 2005 to May 2014 who had bowel inflammation and an inflamed appendix with a maximal outer diameter >6 mm that improved with nonsurgical treatment (the SA group). Ninety-nine patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis (the primary appendicitis [PA] group) from June 2013 to May 2014 and 44 patients with pathologically negative appendectomy results from May 2005 to May 2014 were also included to compare the ultrasonographic features of these conditions. A retrospective review of the ultrasonographic findings was performed by two radiologists. The clinical and laboratory findings were also reviewed. The results were statically analyzed using analysis of variance, the Pearson chi-square test, and the two-tailed Fisher exact test. Results: Compared with PA, cases of SA had a smaller diameter (9.8 mm vs. 6.6 mm, P<0.001), and were less likely to show periappendiceal fat inflammation (98% vs. 6%, P<0.001) or an appendicolith (34% vs. 11%, P<0.001). SA showed mural hyperemia on color Doppler ultrasonography as frequently as PA (P=0.887). Conclusion: The ultrasonographic features of SA included an increased diameter compared to a healthy appendix and the same level of hyperemia as in PA. However, the diameter was commonly in the equivocal range (mean diameter, 6.6 mm), and periappendiceal fat inflammation was rarely present in SA. Twit Text FOAVip Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients ????Ultrasonography http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29141286 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29141286 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29141286}}</ref> Ultrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients #MMPMID29141286 Kwon LM; Lee K; Min SK; Ahn SM; Ha HI; Kim MJ Ultrasonography 2018[Jul]; 37 (3): 233-43 PMID29141286show ga Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of secondary appendicitis (SA) and to discuss the differential findings compared with primary appendicitis. Methods: In this study, we analyzed the ultrasonographic findings of 94 patients under 15 years old of age treated at our institution from May 2005 to May 2014 who had bowel inflammation and an inflamed appendix with a maximal outer diameter >6 mm that improved with nonsurgical treatment (the SA group). Ninety-nine patients with pathologically proven acute appendicitis (the primary appendicitis [PA] group) from June 2013 to May 2014 and 44 patients with pathologically negative appendectomy results from May 2005 to May 2014 were also included to compare the ultrasonographic features of these conditions. A retrospective review of the ultrasonographic findings was performed by two radiologists. The clinical and laboratory findings were also reviewed. The results were statically analyzed using analysis of variance, the Pearson chi-square test, and the two-tailed Fisher exact test. Results: Compared with PA, cases of SA had a smaller diameter (9.8 mm vs. 6.6 mm, P<0.001), and were less likely to show periappendiceal fat inflammation (98% vs. 6%, P<0.001) or an appendicolith (34% vs. 11%, P<0.001). SA showed mural hyperemia on color Doppler ultrasonography as frequently as PA (P=0.887). Conclusion: The ultrasonographic features of SA included an increased diameter compared to a healthy appendix and the same level of hyperemia as in PA. However, the diameter was commonly in the equivocal range (mean diameter, 6.6 mm), and periappendiceal fat inflammation was rarely present in SA. äUltrasound features of secondary appendicitis in pediatric patients (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing