Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pone.0200098 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0200098 C6039009!6039009!29990357     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       PLoS+One 2018 ; 13 (7): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29990357|t=2018. A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation |pdf=|usr=}}{{29990357}} gab.com Text A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation JO: PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29990357 #FOAvip We propose the ?-index as a bibliometric indicator that generalises the h-index. While the h-index is determined by the maximum square that fits under the citation curve of an author when plotting the number of citations in decreasing order, the ?-index is determined by the maximum area rectangle that fits under the curve. The height of the maximum rectangle is the number of citations ck to the kth most-cited publication, where k is the width of the rectangle. The ?-index is then defined as kck, for convenience of comparison with the h-index and other similar indices. We present a comprehensive empirical comparison between the ?-index and other bibliometric indices, focusing on a comparison with the h-index, by analysing two datasets?a large set of Google Scholar profiles and a small set of Nobel prize winners. Our results show that, although the ? and h indices are strongly correlated, they do exhibit significant differences. In particular, we show that, for these data sets, there are a substantial number of profiles for which ? is significantly larger than h. Furthermore, restricting these profiles to the cases when ck > k or ck < k corresponds to, respectively, classifying researchers as either tending to influential, i.e. having many more than h citations, or tending to prolific, i.e. having many more than h publications. Twit Text FOAVip A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation ????PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29990357 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29990357 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29990357}}</ref> A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation #MMPMID29990357 Fenner T; Harris M; Levene M; Bar-Ilan J PLoS One 2018[]; 13 (7): ä PMID29990357show ga We propose the ?-index as a bibliometric indicator that generalises the h-index. While the h-index is determined by the maximum square that fits under the citation curve of an author when plotting the number of citations in decreasing order, the ?-index is determined by the maximum area rectangle that fits under the curve. The height of the maximum rectangle is the number of citations ck to the kth most-cited publication, where k is the width of the rectangle. The ?-index is then defined as kck, for convenience of comparison with the h-index and other similar indices. We present a comprehensive empirical comparison between the ?-index and other bibliometric indices, focusing on a comparison with the h-index, by analysing two datasets?a large set of Google Scholar profiles and a small set of Nobel prize winners. Our results show that, although the ? and h indices are strongly correlated, they do exhibit significant differences. In particular, we show that, for these data sets, there are a substantial number of profiles for which ? is significantly larger than h. Furthermore, restricting these profiles to the cases when ck > k or ck < k corresponds to, respectively, classifying researchers as either tending to influential, i.e. having many more than h citations, or tending to prolific, i.e. having many more than h publications. äA novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing