Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\29136098
.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117 Bioinformatics
2018 ; 34
(7
): 1132-1140
Nephropedia Template TP
gab.com Text
Twit Text FOAVip
Twit Text #
English Wikipedia
Sequential search leads to faster, more efficient fragment-based de novo protein
structure prediction
#MMPMID29136098
de Oliveira SHP
; Law EC
; Shi J
; Deane CM
Bioinformatics
2018[Apr]; 34
(7
): 1132-1140
PMID29136098
show ga
MOTIVATION: Most current de novo structure prediction methods randomly sample
protein conformations and thus require large amounts of computational resource.
Here, we consider a sequential sampling strategy, building on ideas from recent
experimental work which shows that many proteins fold cotranslationally. RESULTS:
We have investigated whether a pseudo-greedy search approach, which begins
sequentially from one of the termini, can improve the performance and accuracy of
de novo protein structure prediction. We observed that our sequential approach
converges when fewer than 20 000 decoys have been produced, fewer than commonly
expected. Using our software, SAINT2, we also compared the run time and quality
of models produced in a sequential fashion against a standard, non-sequential
approach. Sequential prediction produces an individual decoy 1.5-2.5 times faster
than non-sequential prediction. When considering the quality of the best model,
sequential prediction led to a better model being produced for 31 out of 41
soluble protein validation cases and for 18 out of 24 transmembrane protein
cases. Correct models (TM-Score > 0.5) were produced for 29 of these cases by the
sequential mode and for only 22 by the non-sequential mode. Our comparison
reveals that a sequential search strategy can be used to drastically reduce
computational time of de novo protein structure prediction and improve accuracy.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data are available for download from:
http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources. SAINT2 is available for download from:
https://github.com/sauloho/SAINT2. CONTACT: saulo.deoliveira@dtc.ox.ac.uk.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics
online.