Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.ekir.2018.01.014 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.ekir.2018.01.014 C5976814!5976814!29854981     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Kidney+Int+Rep 2018 ; 3 (3): 722-31 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29854981|t=2018. Targeted Transcriptional Profiling of Kidney Transplant Biopsies |pdf=|usr=}}{{29854981}} gab.com Text Targeted Transcriptional Profiling of Kidney Transplant Biopsies JO: Kidney Int Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29854981 #FOAvip Introduction: Studies are needed to assess the quality of transcriptome analysis in paired human tissue samples preserved by different methods and different gene amplification platforms to enable data comparisons across experimenters. Methods: RNA was extracted from kidney biopsies, either submerged in RNA-stabilizing solution (RSS) or stored in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks. RNA quality and integrity were compared. Gene expression of the common rejection module and other immune cell genes were quantified for both tissue preservation methods in the same sample using conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) by 2 different commercial platforms, (fluidigm [FD]) or barcoded-oligos (nanostring [NS]). Results: RNA quality was inferior in FFPE tissues. Despite this, gene expression for 19 measured genes on the same sample, stored in FFPE or RSS, were strongly correlated on the FD (r = 0.81) or NS platforms (r = 0.82). For the same samples, interplatform gene expression correlations were excellent (r = 0.80) for RSS and moderate (r = 0.66) for FFPE. Significant differences in gene expression were confirmed on both platforms (FD: P = 1.1E-03; NS: P = 2.5E-04) for biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Conclusion: Our study provided supportive evidence that despite a low RNA quality of archival FFPE kidney transplantation tissue, small quantities of this tissue can be obtained from existing paraffin blocks to provide a viable and rich biospecimen source for focused gene expression assays. In addition, reliable and reproducible gene expression evaluation can be performed on these FFPE tissues using either a QPCR-based or a barcoded-oligo approach, which provides opportunities for collaborative analytics. Twit Text FOAVip Targeted Transcriptional Profiling of Kidney Transplant Biopsies ????Kidney Int Rep http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29854981 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29854981 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29854981}}</ref> Targeted Transcriptional Profiling of Kidney Transplant Biopsies #MMPMID29854981 Sigdel TK; Nguyen M; Dobi D; Hsieh SC; Liberto JM; Vincenti F; Sarwal MM; Laszik Z Kidney Int Rep 2018[May]; 3 (3): 722-31 PMID29854981show ga Introduction: Studies are needed to assess the quality of transcriptome analysis in paired human tissue samples preserved by different methods and different gene amplification platforms to enable data comparisons across experimenters. Methods: RNA was extracted from kidney biopsies, either submerged in RNA-stabilizing solution (RSS) or stored in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks. RNA quality and integrity were compared. Gene expression of the common rejection module and other immune cell genes were quantified for both tissue preservation methods in the same sample using conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) by 2 different commercial platforms, (fluidigm [FD]) or barcoded-oligos (nanostring [NS]). Results: RNA quality was inferior in FFPE tissues. Despite this, gene expression for 19 measured genes on the same sample, stored in FFPE or RSS, were strongly correlated on the FD (r = 0.81) or NS platforms (r = 0.82). For the same samples, interplatform gene expression correlations were excellent (r = 0.80) for RSS and moderate (r = 0.66) for FFPE. Significant differences in gene expression were confirmed on both platforms (FD: P = 1.1E-03; NS: P = 2.5E-04) for biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Conclusion: Our study provided supportive evidence that despite a low RNA quality of archival FFPE kidney transplantation tissue, small quantities of this tissue can be obtained from existing paraffin blocks to provide a viable and rich biospecimen source for focused gene expression assays. In addition, reliable and reproducible gene expression evaluation can be performed on these FFPE tissues using either a QPCR-based or a barcoded-oligo approach, which provides opportunities for collaborative analytics. äTargeted Transcriptional Profiling of Kidney Transplant Biopsies (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing