Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5217/ir.2018.16.2.299 C5934604!5934604!29743844     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Intest+Res 2018 ; 16 (2): 299-305 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29743844|t=2018. Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?|pdf=|usr=}}{{29743844}} gab.com Text Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation JO: Intest Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29743844 #FOAvip Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). Methods: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m2 or more than 30 kg/m2, or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. Results: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. Conclusions: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m2 and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m2. Twit Text FOAVip Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation ????Intest Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29743844 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29743844 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29743844}}</ref> Difficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation? #MMPMID29743844 Chaubal A; Pandey V; Patel R; Poddar P; Phadke A; Ingle M; Sawant P Intest Res 2018[Apr]; 16 (2): 299-305 PMID29743844show ga Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare tolerance to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation in patients with anticipated difficult colonoscopy (young, thin, obese individuals, and patients with prior abdominal surgery or irradiation). Methods: Patients with body mass index (BMI) less than 18 kg/m2 or more than 30 kg/m2, or who had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgeries were randomized to air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation during colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was cecal intubation with mild pain (less than 5 on visual analogue scale [VAS]), without use of sedation. Results: The primary end point was achieved in 32.7%, 43.8%, and 84.9% of cases with air, carbon dioxide and water insufflation (P<0.001). The mean pain scores were 5.17, 4.72, and 3.93 on the VAS for air, carbon dioxide, and water insufflation (P<0.001). The cecal intubation rate or procedure time did not differ significantly between the 3 groups. Conclusions: Water insufflation was superior to air or carbon dioxide for pain tolerance. This was seen in the subgroups with BMI <18 kg/m2 and the post-surgical group, but not in the group with BMI >30 kg/m2. äDifficult colonoscopy: air, carbon dioxide, or water insufflation?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing