Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.014 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.014 C5933936!5933936!28342946     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 231.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Biomed+Inform 2017 ; 69 (ä): 55-62 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28342946|t=2017. NegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphological, sentential and double negation |pdf=|usr=}}{{28342946}} gab.com Text NegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphological, sentential and double negation JO: J Biomed Inform http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28342946 #FOAvip Many different text features influence text readability and content comprehension. Negation is commonly suggested as one such feature, but few general-purpose tools exist to discover negation and studies of the impact of negation on text readability are rare. In this paper, we introduce a new negation parser (NegAIT) for detecting morphological, sentential, and double negation. We evaluated the parser using a human annotated gold standard containing 500 Wikipedia sentences and achieved 95%, 89% and 67% precision with 100%, 80%, and 67% recall, respectively. We also investigate two applications of this new negation parser. First, we performed a corpus statistics study to demonstrate different negation usage in easy and difficult text. Negation usage was compared in six corpora: patient blogs (4 K sentences), Cochrane reviews (91 K sentences), PubMed abstracts (20 K sentences), clinical trial texts (48 K sentences), and English and Simple English Wikipedia articles for different medical topics (60 K and 6 K sentences). The most difficult text contained the least negation. However, when comparing negation types, difficult texts (i.e., Cochrane, PubMed, English Wikipedia and clinical trials) contained significantly (p < 0.01) more morphological negations. Second, we conducted a predictive analytics study to show the importance of negation in distinguishing between easy and difficulty text. Five binary classifiers (Naïve Bayes, SVM, decision tree, logistic regression and linear regression) were trained using only negation information. All classifiers achieved better performance than the majority baseline. The Naïve Bayes? classifier achieved the highest accuracy at 77% (9% higher than the majority baseline). Twit Text FOAVip NegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphological, sentential and double negation ????J Biomed Inform http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28342946 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28342946 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28342946}}</ref> NegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphological, sentential and double negation #MMPMID28342946 Mukherjee P; Leroy G; Kauchak D; Rajanarayanan S; Romero Diaz DY; Yuan NP; Pritchard TG; Colina S J Biomed Inform 2017[May]; 69 (ä): 55-62 PMID28342946show ga Many different text features influence text readability and content comprehension. Negation is commonly suggested as one such feature, but few general-purpose tools exist to discover negation and studies of the impact of negation on text readability are rare. In this paper, we introduce a new negation parser (NegAIT) for detecting morphological, sentential, and double negation. We evaluated the parser using a human annotated gold standard containing 500 Wikipedia sentences and achieved 95%, 89% and 67% precision with 100%, 80%, and 67% recall, respectively. We also investigate two applications of this new negation parser. First, we performed a corpus statistics study to demonstrate different negation usage in easy and difficult text. Negation usage was compared in six corpora: patient blogs (4 K sentences), Cochrane reviews (91 K sentences), PubMed abstracts (20 K sentences), clinical trial texts (48 K sentences), and English and Simple English Wikipedia articles for different medical topics (60 K and 6 K sentences). The most difficult text contained the least negation. However, when comparing negation types, difficult texts (i.e., Cochrane, PubMed, English Wikipedia and clinical trials) contained significantly (p < 0.01) more morphological negations. Second, we conducted a predictive analytics study to show the importance of negation in distinguishing between easy and difficulty text. Five binary classifiers (Naïve Bayes, SVM, decision tree, logistic regression and linear regression) were trained using only negation information. All classifiers achieved better performance than the majority baseline. The Naïve Bayes? classifier achieved the highest accuracy at 77% (9% higher than the majority baseline). äNegAIT: A new parser for medical text simplification using morphologic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing