Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1089/end.2017.0596 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1089/end.2017.0596 C5909080!5909080!29463122     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Endourol 2018 ; 32 (4): 329-37 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29463122|t=2018. Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices |pdf=|usr=}}{{29463122}} gab.com Text Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices JO: J Endourol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29463122 #FOAvip Introduction: We evaluated and compared five currently available energy-based vessel sealing devices to assess typical surgical metrics.Methods: We tested Caiman 5 (C5), Harmonic Scalpel Ace Plus (HA), Harmonic Ace +7 (HA7), LigaSure (LS), and Enseal G2 (ES) on small (2?5?mm), medium (5.1?7?mm), and large (7.1?9?mm) vessels obtained from 15 Yorkshire pigs. Vessels were randomly sealed and transected. We recorded sealing and transection time, charring and carbonization, thermal spread, and bursting pressure (BP). Specimens were sent for histopathologic evaluation of seal quality and thermal spread.Results: A total of 246 vessels were evaluated: 125 were arteries and 121 were veins. There was no difference in BPs for small size arteries. For medium arteries, C5 provided the highest BP (proximal and distal jaw), followed by HA7, ES, LS, and HA [1740, 1600, 1165, 1165, 981, and 571?mm Hg, respectively, HA<C5-D(<0.001); HA<C5-P(<0.001); HA<ES(0.002); HA<HA7(0.002); HA7<C5-P(0.026); ES<C5-P(0.026); LS<C5-P(0.001); LS<C5-D(0.014)]. For large arteries, C5 and LS provided highest BP followed by HA7, ES, and HA [1676, 530, 467, 467, and 254?mm Hg, respectively, C5<HA(<0.001); C5<HA7(0.006); C5<ES(0.006); C5<LS(0.012)]. There were no bursting pressure failures for C5, HA7, and LS up to 9?mm vessels. For medium and large size arteries, HA had bursting failure of 20% and 40%, respectively. The ES was significantly less efficient with small, medium, and large arteries with bursting failure rates of 10%, 40%, and 80%, respectively.Conclusions: In this study, C5 outperformed all other devices. However, all of the devices provide a seal that was superphysiologic in that all burst pressures were >250?mm Hg. Twit Text FOAVip Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices ????J Endourol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29463122 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29463122 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29463122}}</ref> Evaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel Sealing Devices #MMPMID29463122 Okhunov Z; Yoon R; Lusch A; Spradling K; Suarez M; Kaler KS; Patel R; Hwang C; Osann K; Huang J; Lee T; Landman J J Endourol 2018[Apr]; 32 (4): 329-37 PMID29463122show ga Introduction: We evaluated and compared five currently available energy-based vessel sealing devices to assess typical surgical metrics.Methods: We tested Caiman 5 (C5), Harmonic Scalpel Ace Plus (HA), Harmonic Ace +7 (HA7), LigaSure (LS), and Enseal G2 (ES) on small (2?5?mm), medium (5.1?7?mm), and large (7.1?9?mm) vessels obtained from 15 Yorkshire pigs. Vessels were randomly sealed and transected. We recorded sealing and transection time, charring and carbonization, thermal spread, and bursting pressure (BP). Specimens were sent for histopathologic evaluation of seal quality and thermal spread.Results: A total of 246 vessels were evaluated: 125 were arteries and 121 were veins. There was no difference in BPs for small size arteries. For medium arteries, C5 provided the highest BP (proximal and distal jaw), followed by HA7, ES, LS, and HA [1740, 1600, 1165, 1165, 981, and 571?mm Hg, respectively, HA250?mm Hg. äEvaluation and Comparison of Contemporary Energy-Based Surgical Vessel(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing