Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5195/jmla.2018.281 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5195/jmla.2018.281 C5886505!5886505!29632445     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Med+Libr+Assoc 2018 ; 106 (2): 227-34 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29632445|t=2018. Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion?|pdf=|usr=}}{{29632445}} gab.com Text Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion JO: J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29632445 #FOAvip Objectives: The research tested the authors? hypothesis that more researchers from the academic medicine community in the United States and Canada with institutional access to Embase had started using Embase to replace MEDLINE since Embase was expanded in 2010 to cover all MEDLINE records. Methods: We contacted libraries of 140 and 17 medical schools in the United States and Canada, respectively, to confirm their subscriptions to Embase 5 years before and 5 years after 2010. We searched the names of institutions with confirmed Embase access in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase to retrieve works authored by affiliates of those institutions. We then examined 100 randomly selected records from each of the 5 years before and 5 years after the Embase coverage expansion in 2010. We hypothesized that studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE would increase due to the Embase coverage expansion. Results: The number of studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE did not change between the pre-2010 and post-2010 periods. Conclusion: Our hypothesis was refuted. Studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE did not increase post-2010. Our results suggest the academic medicine community in the United States and Canada that had access did not use Embase to replace MEDLINE, despite the Embase coverage expansion. Twit Text FOAVip Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion ????J Med Libr Assoc http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29632445 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29632445 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29632445}}</ref> Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion? #MMPMID29632445 Lam MT; De Longhi C; Turnbull J; Lam HR; Besa R J Med Libr Assoc 2018[Apr]; 106 (2): 227-34 PMID29632445show ga Objectives: The research tested the authors? hypothesis that more researchers from the academic medicine community in the United States and Canada with institutional access to Embase had started using Embase to replace MEDLINE since Embase was expanded in 2010 to cover all MEDLINE records. Methods: We contacted libraries of 140 and 17 medical schools in the United States and Canada, respectively, to confirm their subscriptions to Embase 5 years before and 5 years after 2010. We searched the names of institutions with confirmed Embase access in Ovid MEDLINE and Embase to retrieve works authored by affiliates of those institutions. We then examined 100 randomly selected records from each of the 5 years before and 5 years after the Embase coverage expansion in 2010. We hypothesized that studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE would increase due to the Embase coverage expansion. Results: The number of studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE did not change between the pre-2010 and post-2010 periods. Conclusion: Our hypothesis was refuted. Studies that used Embase but not MEDLINE did not increase post-2010. Our results suggest the academic medicine community in the United States and Canada that had access did not use Embase to replace MEDLINE, despite the Embase coverage expansion. äHas Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing