Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5
suck pdf from google scholar
C5885313!5885313!29632801
unlimited free pdf from europmc29632801    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi


Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534

Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
pmid29632801      Pneumonia+(Nathan) 2018 ; 10 (ä): ä
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia: a systematic review #MMPMID29632801
  • Nakashima H; Watanabe K; Umegaki H; Suzuki Y; Kuzuya M
  • Pneumonia (Nathan) 2018[]; 10 (ä): ä PMID29632801show ga
  • Background: Pneumonia is a very common disease, especially among the elderly. Various drugs? preventive effects against pneumonia have been reported. The antiplatelet drug cilostazol is used to prevent pneumonia, but the robustness of its efficacy is unclear. This review estimates the effectiveness of cilostazol for preventing pneumonia in elderly individuals. Methods: The following databases were searched from the earliest record to January 2016, without language restriction (the secondary search was conducted on February 2017): MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Ichushi-Web. Studies were included if they were published randomized controlled trials investigating the preventive effect of cilostazol on pneumonia in the elderly. The outcome was the incidence of pneumonia. Results: Two trials were identified that met the search criteria (1423 participants). Both trials compared cilostazol with no antiplatelet in patients with a history of cerebral infarction. A meta-analysis was not performed because of the small number of trials and the heterogeneity of the data. Both trials suggested that cilostazol reduced the incidence of pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22?0.73 in one trial, RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.06?0.69 in the other) and the recurrence of cerebral infarction (0.43; 0.21?0.90, 0.53; 0.34?0.81, respectively). The quality of evidence provided by the trials was very low, mainly because of the high risk of bias. Conclusions: It is difficult to draw conclusions on the basis of two trials. Moreover, in the two trials, cilostazol could have reduced the incidence of pneumonia via a reduction of the recurrence of cerebral infarction, which suggests that other antiplatelets could also have the same effects. Stronger evidence is required from large trials assessing the effectiveness of cilostazol for the prevention of pneumonia. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42016036724). Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41479-018-0046-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box