Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236 C5881486!5881486!29619142     free     free     free       Pharm+Pract+(Granada) 2018 ; 16 (1): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29619142|t=2018. Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers |pdf=|usr=}}{{29619142}} gab.com Text Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers JO: Pharm Pract (Granada) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29619142 #FOAvip The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer? Twit Text FOAVip Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers ????Pharm Pract (Granada) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29619142 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29619142 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29619142}}</ref> Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers #MMPMID29619142 Fernandez-Llimos F Pharm Pract (Granada) 2018[Jan]; 16 (1): ä PMID29619142show ga The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer? äScholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing