Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/s-0043-121985 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/s-0043-121985 C5876023!5876023!29607392     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=29607392&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Endosc+Int+Open 2018 ; 6 (4): E410-3 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29607392|t=2018. Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs clinical practice |pdf=|usr=}}{{29607392}} gab.com Text Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs clinical practice JO: Endosc Int Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29607392 #FOAvip Background and study aims: ?Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally evaluated in routine clinical practice. We investigated the success rate of our previously published colon cleansing protocol as utilized in our clinical practice. Patients and methods: ?This was a retrospective study. In the clinical practice, the colon cleansing protocol included PEG-3350?at a dose of 2?g/kg/day plus Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, Boehringer Ingelheim, TX USA) 5?mg/day for 2 days. Adequate colon preparation was graded between 1???5, as previously described, and grade ??4.0 was considered an adequate preparation. Patients were instructed to complete a questionnaire that included PEG-3350 dose, number of stools per day, consistency of each stool, and side effects (vomiting, abdominal pain). Clinical and endoscopic results were compared between the protocol under research conditions and routine practice. Results: ?The success rate of the colon preparation in our clinical practice was similar to the results observed under our research protocol (75?% vs. 73.6?%). Moreover, the total number of stools, stool consistency, and the intubation rate of the terminal ileum were also similar. We concluded, that in our experience, the colon cleansing protocol used under research conditions was effective and appropriate for use in routine clinical practice. Conclusion: ?We recommend testing each new protocol under the routine conditions of clinical practice to confirm its applicability for general practitioners. Twit Text FOAVip Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs clinical practice ????Endosc Int Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29607392 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29607392 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29607392}}</ref> Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs clinical practice #MMPMID29607392 Elitsur Y; Balfaqih Y; Preston D Endosc Int Open 2018[Apr]; 6 (4): E410-3 PMID29607392show ga Background and study aims: ?Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally evaluated in routine clinical practice. We investigated the success rate of our previously published colon cleansing protocol as utilized in our clinical practice. Patients and methods: ?This was a retrospective study. In the clinical practice, the colon cleansing protocol included PEG-3350?at a dose of 2?g/kg/day plus Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, Boehringer Ingelheim, TX USA) 5?mg/day for 2 days. Adequate colon preparation was graded between 1???5, as previously described, and grade ??4.0 was considered an adequate preparation. Patients were instructed to complete a questionnaire that included PEG-3350 dose, number of stools per day, consistency of each stool, and side effects (vomiting, abdominal pain). Clinical and endoscopic results were compared between the protocol under research conditions and routine practice. Results: ?The success rate of the colon preparation in our clinical practice was similar to the results observed under our research protocol (75?% vs. 73.6?%). Moreover, the total number of stools, stool consistency, and the intubation rate of the terminal ileum were also similar. We concluded, that in our experience, the colon cleansing protocol used under research conditions was effective and appropriate for use in routine clinical practice. Conclusion: ?We recommend testing each new protocol under the routine conditions of clinical practice to confirm its applicability for general practitioners. äColon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs clinical(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing