Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4608 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4608 C5875486!5875486!24710448     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Appl+Clin+Med+Phys 2014 ; 15 (2): 226-34 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=24710448|t=2014. Dosimetric advantages of O?ring design radiotherapy system for skull?base tumors |pdf=|usr=}}{{24710448}} gab.com Text Dosimetric advantages of O ring design radiotherapy system for skull base tumors JO: J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24710448 #FOAvip The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new O?ring design radiotherapy delivery system has advantages in radiotherapy planning for skull?base tumors. Twenty?five patients with skull?base tumors were included in this study. Two plans were made using conventional (Plan A) or new (Plan B) techniques. Plan A consisted of four dynamic conformal arcs (DCAs): two were horizontal, and the other two were from cranial directions. Plan B was created by converting horizontal arcs to those from caudal directions making use of the O?ring design radiotherapy system. The micromultileaf collimators were fitted to cover at least 99% of the planning target volume with prescribed doses, 90% of the dose at the isocenter. The two plans were compared in terms of target homogeneity, conformity, and irradiated volume of normal tissues, using a two?sided paired t?test. For evaluation regarding target coverage, the homogeneity indices defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 83 were 0.099±0.010 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.092±0.010, the conformity indices defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 1.720±0.249 and 1.675±0.239, and the Paddick's conformity indices were 0.585±0.078 and 0.602±0.080, in Plans A and B, respectively. For evaluation of irradiated normal tissue, the Paddick's gradient indices were 3.118±0.283 and 2.938±0.263 in Plans A and B, respectively. All of these differences were statistically significant (p?values <0.05). The mean doses of optic nerves, eyes, brainstem, and hippocampi were also significantly lower in Plan B. The DCA technique from caudal directions using the new O?ring design radiotherapy system can improve target homogeneity and conformity compared with conventional DCA techniques, and can also decrease the volume of surrounding normal tissues that receives moderate doses.PACS numbers: 87.55.?x, 87.55.D?, 87.55.dk Twit Text FOAVip Dosimetric advantages of O ring design radiotherapy system for skull base tumors ????J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24710448 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=24710448 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|24710448}}</ref> Dosimetric advantages of O?ring design radiotherapy system for skull?base tumors #MMPMID24710448 Ogura K; Mizowaki T; Ishida Y; Hiraoka M J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014[Mar]; 15 (2): 226-34 PMID24710448show ga The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a new O?ring design radiotherapy delivery system has advantages in radiotherapy planning for skull?base tumors. Twenty?five patients with skull?base tumors were included in this study. Two plans were made using conventional (Plan A) or new (Plan B) techniques. Plan A consisted of four dynamic conformal arcs (DCAs): two were horizontal, and the other two were from cranial directions. Plan B was created by converting horizontal arcs to those from caudal directions making use of the O?ring design radiotherapy system. The micromultileaf collimators were fitted to cover at least 99% of the planning target volume with prescribed doses, 90% of the dose at the isocenter. The two plans were compared in terms of target homogeneity, conformity, and irradiated volume of normal tissues, using a two?sided paired t?test. For evaluation regarding target coverage, the homogeneity indices defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements 83 were 0.099±0.010 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.092±0.010, the conformity indices defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group were 1.720±0.249 and 1.675±0.239, and the Paddick's conformity indices were 0.585±0.078 and 0.602±0.080, in Plans A and B, respectively. For evaluation of irradiated normal tissue, the Paddick's gradient indices were 3.118±0.283 and 2.938±0.263 in Plans A and B, respectively. All of these differences were statistically significant (p?values <0.05). The mean doses of optic nerves, eyes, brainstem, and hippocampi were also significantly lower in Plan B. The DCA technique from caudal directions using the new O?ring design radiotherapy system can improve target homogeneity and conformity compared with conventional DCA techniques, and can also decrease the volume of surrounding normal tissues that receives moderate doses.PACS numbers: 87.55.?x, 87.55.D?, 87.55.dk äDosimetric advantages of O?ring design radiotherapy system for skull?b(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing