Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7150/ntno.24793 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7150/ntno.24793 C5865272!5865272!29577022     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Nanotheranostics 2018 ; 2 (2): 197-200 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29577022|t=2018. Writing a review article - Are you making these mistakes?|pdf=|usr=}}{{29577022}} gab.com Text Writing a review article - Are you making these mistakes JO: Nanotheranostics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29577022 #FOAvip An explosion of scientific publications over the last decades has increased the need for review articles: Carefully crafted scientific review articles can provide the novice reader with an overview of a new subject and provide the expert with a synthesis of scientific evidence, proof of reproducibility of published data and pooled estimates of common truth through meta-analyses. Unfortunately, while there are ample presentations and published guidelines for the preparation of scientific articles available, detailed information about how to properly prepare scientific review articles is relatively scarce. This perspective summarizes possible mistakes that can lead to misinformation in scientific review articles with the goal to help authors to improve the scientific contribution of their review article and thereby, increase the respective value of these articles for the scientific community. Twit Text FOAVip Writing a review article - Are you making these mistakes ????Nanotheranostics http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29577022 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29577022 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29577022}}</ref> Writing a review article - Are you making these mistakes? #MMPMID29577022 Daldrup-Link HE Nanotheranostics 2018[]; 2 (2): 197-200 PMID29577022show ga An explosion of scientific publications over the last decades has increased the need for review articles: Carefully crafted scientific review articles can provide the novice reader with an overview of a new subject and provide the expert with a synthesis of scientific evidence, proof of reproducibility of published data and pooled estimates of common truth through meta-analyses. Unfortunately, while there are ample presentations and published guidelines for the preparation of scientific articles available, detailed information about how to properly prepare scientific review articles is relatively scarce. This perspective summarizes possible mistakes that can lead to misinformation in scientific review articles with the goal to help authors to improve the scientific contribution of their review article and thereby, increase the respective value of these articles for the scientific community. äWriting a review article - Are you making these mistakes?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing