Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1710755115 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1710755115 C5856510!5856510!29531025     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=29531025&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 219.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2018 ; 115 (11): 2613-9 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29531025|t=2018. Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature |pdf=|usr=}}{{29531025}} gab.com Text Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531025 #FOAvip Publication in peer-reviewed journals is an essential step in the scientific process. However, publication is not simply the reporting of facts arising from a straightforward analysis thereof. Authors have broad latitude when writing their reports and may be tempted to consciously or unconsciously ?spin? their study findings. Spin has been defined as a specific intentional or unintentional reporting that fails to faithfully reflect the nature and range of findings and that could affect the impression the results produce in readers. This article, based on a literature review, reports the various practices of spin from misreporting by ?beautification? of methods to misreporting by misinterpreting the results. It provides data on the prevalence of some forms of spin in specific fields and the possible effects of some types of spin on readers? interpretation and research dissemination. We also discuss why researchers would spin their reports and possible ways to avoid it. Twit Text FOAVip Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531025 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29531025 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29531025}}</ref> Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature #MMPMID29531025 Boutron I; Ravaud P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018[Mar]; 115 (11): 2613-9 PMID29531025show ga Publication in peer-reviewed journals is an essential step in the scientific process. However, publication is not simply the reporting of facts arising from a straightforward analysis thereof. Authors have broad latitude when writing their reports and may be tempted to consciously or unconsciously ?spin? their study findings. Spin has been defined as a specific intentional or unintentional reporting that fails to faithfully reflect the nature and range of findings and that could affect the impression the results produce in readers. This article, based on a literature review, reports the various practices of spin from misreporting by ?beautification? of methods to misreporting by misinterpreting the results. It provides data on the prevalence of some forms of spin in specific fields and the possible effects of some types of spin on readers? interpretation and research dissemination. We also discuss why researchers would spin their reports and possible ways to avoid it. äMisrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing