Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/cre2.5 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/cre2.5 C5839182!5839182!29744137     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Clin+Exp+Dent+Res 2015 ; 1 (1): 26-31 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29744137|t=2015. DIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calculus: an in vitro study |pdf=|usr=}}{{29744137}} gab.com Text DIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calculus: an in vitro study JO: Clin Exp Dent Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29744137 #FOAvip The objective of this study is to compare the performance of the DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence (LF) Pen to conventional periodontal probing for detection of subgingival calculus under defined laboratory conditions. Extracted teeth with various levels of subgingival deposits of calculus were mounted anatomically in stone casts, and an impression material was used to replicate periodontal soft tissues. The casts were examined for the presence of subgingival calculus at eight surfaces per tooth (240 sites) using LF and a periodontal probe. Sites were rescored after 1 and 3?weeks. Direct imaging of the root surfaces under magnification was the gold standard. As a result, for an experienced operator, LF was more accurate than tactile assessment (across all sites, 84.0% vs. 59.8%). The performance difference was greater for multi?rooted teeth (85.8% vs. 56.9%) than single?rooted teeth (77.2% vs. 66.7%). The performance of LF in this laboratory trial was influenced strongly by clinician skill and experience. When used by an experienced operator, LF was more sensitive (75.1% vs. 69.2%), specific (92.6% vs. 86.3%), and accurate (84% vs. 77.9%) than for an inexperienced operator. In conclusion, under the defined laboratory conditions used, LF had better performance than tactile examination, particularly for multi?rooted teeth. This method may have value clinically as an adjunct for detecting subgingival deposits of calculus in clinical practice. The usefulness of the method improves with operator experience. Twit Text FOAVip DIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calculus: an in vitro study ????Clin Exp Dent Res http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29744137 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29744137 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29744137}}</ref> DIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calculus: an in vitro study #MMPMID29744137 Shakibaie F; Walsh LJ Clin Exp Dent Res 2015[Oct]; 1 (1): 26-31 PMID29744137show ga The objective of this study is to compare the performance of the DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence (LF) Pen to conventional periodontal probing for detection of subgingival calculus under defined laboratory conditions. Extracted teeth with various levels of subgingival deposits of calculus were mounted anatomically in stone casts, and an impression material was used to replicate periodontal soft tissues. The casts were examined for the presence of subgingival calculus at eight surfaces per tooth (240 sites) using LF and a periodontal probe. Sites were rescored after 1 and 3?weeks. Direct imaging of the root surfaces under magnification was the gold standard. As a result, for an experienced operator, LF was more accurate than tactile assessment (across all sites, 84.0% vs. 59.8%). The performance difference was greater for multi?rooted teeth (85.8% vs. 56.9%) than single?rooted teeth (77.2% vs. 66.7%). The performance of LF in this laboratory trial was influenced strongly by clinician skill and experience. When used by an experienced operator, LF was more sensitive (75.1% vs. 69.2%), specific (92.6% vs. 86.3%), and accurate (84% vs. 77.9%) than for an inexperienced operator. In conclusion, under the defined laboratory conditions used, LF had better performance than tactile examination, particularly for multi?rooted teeth. This method may have value clinically as an adjunct for detecting subgingival deposits of calculus in clinical practice. The usefulness of the method improves with operator experience. äDIAGNOdent Pen versus tactile sense for detection of subgingival calcu(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing