Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1371/journal.pone.0193600 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1371/journal.pone.0193600 C5831629!5831629!29489912     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 235.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       PLoS+One 2018 ; 13 (2): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29489912|t=2018. Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{29489912}} gab.com Text Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis JO: PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29489912 #FOAvip The debate still rages on for the usefulness of ureteral access sheath (UAS). Therefore, a meta-analysis to discuss the effects of applying UAS during ureteroscopy was performed. The protocol for the review is available on PROSPERO (CRD42017052327). A literature search was conducted up to November, 2017 using the Web of science, PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The quality of articles was assessed by the Jadad scale and Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Egger?s test and the trim-and-fill method were used to evaluate publication bias. Effect sizes were calculated by pooled odds ratio (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the origin of heterogeneity. Eight trials with a total of 3099 patients and 3127 procedures were identified. Results showed no significant difference in stone-free rate (SFR) (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.52?1.33, P = 0.45), intraoperative complications (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.81?7.69, P = 0.88), operative time (MD = 4.09, 95% CI -15.08?23.26, P = 0.68) and hospitalization duration (MD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.32?0.06, P = 0.18). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was higher in UAS group (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.06?2.00, P = 0.02). Evidence from meta-analysis indicated that the use of UAS during ureteroscopy did not manifest advantages. However, given the intrinsic restrictions of the quality of selected articles, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to update the findings of this analysis. Twit Text FOAVip Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis ????PLoS One http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29489912 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29489912 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29489912}}</ref> Use of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID29489912 Huang J; Zhao Z; AlSmadi JK; Liang X; Zhong F; Zeng T; Wu W; Deng T; Lai Y; Liu L; Zeng G; Wu W PLoS One 2018[]; 13 (2): ä PMID29489912show ga The debate still rages on for the usefulness of ureteral access sheath (UAS). Therefore, a meta-analysis to discuss the effects of applying UAS during ureteroscopy was performed. The protocol for the review is available on PROSPERO (CRD42017052327). A literature search was conducted up to November, 2017 using the Web of science, PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The quality of articles was assessed by the Jadad scale and Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). Egger?s test and the trim-and-fill method were used to evaluate publication bias. Effect sizes were calculated by pooled odds ratio (ORs) and mean differences (MDs). Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the origin of heterogeneity. Eight trials with a total of 3099 patients and 3127 procedures were identified. Results showed no significant difference in stone-free rate (SFR) (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.52?1.33, P = 0.45), intraoperative complications (OR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.81?7.69, P = 0.88), operative time (MD = 4.09, 95% CI -15.08?23.26, P = 0.68) and hospitalization duration (MD = -0.13, 95% CI -0.32?0.06, P = 0.18). However, the incidence of postoperative complications was higher in UAS group (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.06?2.00, P = 0.02). Evidence from meta-analysis indicated that the use of UAS during ureteroscopy did not manifest advantages. However, given the intrinsic restrictions of the quality of selected articles, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are warranted to update the findings of this analysis. äUse of the ureteral access sheath during ureteroscopy: A systematic re(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing