Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27788924
&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534
Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\27788924
.jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117 Surgery
2017 ; 161
(3
): 782-790
Nephropedia Template TP
gab.com Text
Twit Text FOAVip
Twit Text #
English Wikipedia
Failure-to-rescue after injury is associated with preventability: The results of
mortality panel review of failure-to-rescue cases in trauma
#MMPMID27788924
Kuo LE
; Kaufman E
; Hoffman RL
; Pascual JL
; Martin ND
; Kelz RR
; Holena DN
Surgery
2017[Mar]; 161
(3
): 782-790
PMID27788924
show ga
BACKGROUND: Failure-to-rescue is defined as the conditional probability of death
after a complication, and the failure-to-rescue rate reflects a center's ability
to successfully "rescue" patients after complications. The validity of the
failure-to-rescue rate as a quality measure is dependent on the preventability of
death and the appropriateness of this measure for use in the trauma population is
untested. We sought to evaluate the relationship between preventability and
failure-to-rescue in trauma. METHODS: All adjudications from a mortality review
panel at an academic level I trauma center from 2005-2015 were merged with
registry data for the same time period. The preventability of each death was
determined by panel consensus as part of peer review. Failure-to-rescue deaths
were defined as those occurring after any registry-defined complication.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models between failure-to-rescue
status and preventability were constructed and time to death was examined using
survival time analyses. RESULTS: Of 26,557 patients, 2,735 (10.5%) had a
complication, of whom 359 died for a failure-to-rescue rate of 13.2%. Of
failure-to-rescue deaths, 272 (75.6%) were judged to be non-preventable, 65
(18.1%) were judged potentially preventable, and 22 (6.1%) were judged to be
preventable by peer review. After adjusting for other patient factors, there
remained a strong association between failure-to-rescue status and potentially
preventable (odds ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval, 1.47-3.66) and preventable
(odds ratio 14.84, 95% confidence interval, 3.30-66.71) judgment. CONCLUSION:
Despite a strong association between failure-to-rescue status and preventability
adjudication, only a minority of deaths meeting the definition of failure to
rescue were judged to be preventable or potentially preventable. Revision of the
failure-to-rescue metric before use in trauma care benchmarking is warranted.
|*Failure to Rescue, Health Care
[MESH]
|Adult
[MESH]
|Aged
[MESH]
|Female
[MESH]
|Hospital Mortality
[MESH]
|Humans
[MESH]
|Male
[MESH]
|Middle Aged
[MESH]
|Retrospective Studies
[MESH]
|Survival Analysis
[MESH]
|Wounds and Injuries/*mortality/*prevention & control
[MESH]