Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1002/acm2.12234 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1002/acm2.12234 C5768016!5768016!29193644     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 233.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Appl+Clin+Med+Phys 2018 ; 19 (1): 250-8 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29193644|t=2018. The use of needle holders in CTF guided biopsies as a dose reduction tool |pdf=|usr=}}{{29193644}} gab.com Text The use of needle holders in CTF guided biopsies as a dose reduction tool JO: J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29193644 #FOAvip Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of needle holders in reducing staff hand exposure during biopsies guided by computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF), through the analysis of data acquired during a detailed monitoring study, undertaken in parallel with an ongoing optimization process to reduce hand irradiation. Methods: Hand monitoring was performed with 11 extremity detectors, two per finger (base and tip) and one on the back of the wrist, for the left (dominant) hand, during two series of biopsies with comparable characteristics. The first series (47 biopsies) were performed with only quick?check method (QC) and occasional side?handle (SH) manipulation of the needle. The second series (63 biopsies) were performed after introducing needle holders (NH) in the course of an optimization process. Results: Choice of technique (QC, QC + NH, QC + SH) by the interventional radiologist (IR) was related to biopsy difficulty. Measured hand exposure was low (< 1 mSv) for all QC?only procedures, and for most of the QC + NH procedures. Occasional side?handle manipulation still occurred during challenging biopsies, so that 8% of biopsies in the second series accounted for ~70% of total fingertip dose (~90 mSv). The methodology used allowed a detailed insight into the dose reduction achievable with needle holders during real procedures, without the limitations of phantom measurements. Conclusions: Needle holders proved effective in reducing mean hand exposure during clinical procedures where real?time manipulation was necessary. Occasional side?handle manipulation was found to contribute disproportionately to hand exposure. This highlights the importance of individual hand monitoring during CTF guided procedures. Twit Text FOAVip The use of needle holders in CTF guided biopsies as a dose reduction tool ????J Appl Clin Med Phys http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29193644 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29193644 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29193644}}</ref> The use of needle holders in CTF guided biopsies as a dose reduction tool #MMPMID29193644 Sarmento S; Pereira JS; Sousa MJ; Cunha LT; Dias AG; Pereira MF; Oliveira AD; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Santos JA; Alves JG J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018[Jan]; 19 (1): 250-8 PMID29193644show ga Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of needle holders in reducing staff hand exposure during biopsies guided by computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF), through the analysis of data acquired during a detailed monitoring study, undertaken in parallel with an ongoing optimization process to reduce hand irradiation. Methods: Hand monitoring was performed with 11 extremity detectors, two per finger (base and tip) and one on the back of the wrist, for the left (dominant) hand, during two series of biopsies with comparable characteristics. The first series (47 biopsies) were performed with only quick?check method (QC) and occasional side?handle (SH) manipulation of the needle. The second series (63 biopsies) were performed after introducing needle holders (NH) in the course of an optimization process. Results: Choice of technique (QC, QC + NH, QC + SH) by the interventional radiologist (IR) was related to biopsy difficulty. Measured hand exposure was low (< 1 mSv) for all QC?only procedures, and for most of the QC + NH procedures. Occasional side?handle manipulation still occurred during challenging biopsies, so that 8% of biopsies in the second series accounted for ~70% of total fingertip dose (~90 mSv). The methodology used allowed a detailed insight into the dose reduction achievable with needle holders during real procedures, without the limitations of phantom measurements. Conclusions: Needle holders proved effective in reducing mean hand exposure during clinical procedures where real?time manipulation was necessary. Occasional side?handle manipulation was found to contribute disproportionately to hand exposure. This highlights the importance of individual hand monitoring during CTF guided procedures. äThe use of needle holders in CTF guided biopsies as a dose reduction t(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing