Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s12199-017-0677-9 C5664422!5664422!29165173     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Environ+Health+Prev+Med 2017 ; 22 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=29165173|t=2017. Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic review |pdf=|usr=}}{{29165173}} gab.com Text Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic review JO: Environ Health Prev Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29165173 #FOAvip Background: Numerous studies have reported that spending time in nature is associated with the improvement of various health outcomes and well-being. This review evaluated the physical and psychological benefits of a specific type of exposure to nature, forest therapy. Method: A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and ProQuest databases and manual searches from inception up to December 2016. Key words: ?Forest? or ?Shinrin -Yoku? or ?Forest bath? AND ?Health? or ?Wellbeing?. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. Results: Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Participants? ages ranged from 20 to 79 years. Sample size ranged from 18 to 99. Populations studied varied from young healthy university students to elderly people with chronic disease. Studies reported the positive impact of forest therapy on hypertension (n?=?2), cardiac and pulmonary function (n?=?1), immune function (n?=?2), inflammation (n?=?3), oxidative stress (n?=?1), stress (n?=?1), stress hormone (n?=?1), anxiety (n?=?1), depression (n?=?2), and emotional response (n?=?3). The quality of all studies included in this review had a high ROB. Conclusion: Forest therapy may play an important role in health promotion and disease prevention. However, the lack of high-quality studies limits the strength of results, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish clinical practice guidelines for its use. More robust RCTs are warranted. Twit Text FOAVip Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic review ????Environ Health Prev Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29165173 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=29165173 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|29165173}}</ref> Health and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic review #MMPMID29165173 Oh B; Lee KJ; Zaslawski C; Yeung A; Rosenthal D; Larkey L; Back M Environ Health Prev Med 2017[]; 22 (ä): ä PMID29165173show ga Background: Numerous studies have reported that spending time in nature is associated with the improvement of various health outcomes and well-being. This review evaluated the physical and psychological benefits of a specific type of exposure to nature, forest therapy. Method: A literature search was carried out using MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and ProQuest databases and manual searches from inception up to December 2016. Key words: ?Forest? or ?Shinrin -Yoku? or ?Forest bath? AND ?Health? or ?Wellbeing?. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias (ROB) tool. Results: Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Participants? ages ranged from 20 to 79 years. Sample size ranged from 18 to 99. Populations studied varied from young healthy university students to elderly people with chronic disease. Studies reported the positive impact of forest therapy on hypertension (n?=?2), cardiac and pulmonary function (n?=?1), immune function (n?=?2), inflammation (n?=?3), oxidative stress (n?=?1), stress (n?=?1), stress hormone (n?=?1), anxiety (n?=?1), depression (n?=?2), and emotional response (n?=?3). The quality of all studies included in this review had a high ROB. Conclusion: Forest therapy may play an important role in health promotion and disease prevention. However, the lack of high-quality studies limits the strength of results, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish clinical practice guidelines for its use. More robust RCTs are warranted. äHealth and well-being benefits of spending time in forests: systematic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing