Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.7554/eLife.27725 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.7554/eLife.27725 C5584989!5584989!28873054     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       eLife 2017 ; 6 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28873054|t=2017. The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time |pdf=|usr=}}{{28873054}} gab.com Text The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time JO: eLife http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28873054 #FOAvip Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. Readability formulas can estimate how difficult a text is to read. Here, in a corpus consisting of 709,577 abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Our analyses show that this trend is indicative of a growing use of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact both the reproducibility and accessibility of research findings. Twit Text FOAVip The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time ????eLife http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28873054 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28873054 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28873054}}</ref> The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time #MMPMID28873054 Plavén-Sigray P; Matheson GJ; Schiffler BC; Thompson WH eLife 2017[]; 6 (ä): ä PMID28873054show ga Clarity and accuracy of reporting are fundamental to the scientific process. Readability formulas can estimate how difficult a text is to read. Here, in a corpus consisting of 709,577 abstracts published between 1881 and 2015 from 123 scientific journals, we show that the readability of science is steadily decreasing. Our analyses show that this trend is indicative of a growing use of general scientific jargon. These results are concerning for scientists and for the wider public, as they impact both the reproducibility and accessibility of research findings. äThe readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing