Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.021 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.021 C5557647!5557647!28583809     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=28583809&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Biomed+Inform 2017 ; 71 (ä): 165-77 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28583809|t=2017. An Empirical Analysis of Ontology Reuse in BioPortal |pdf=|usr=}}{{28583809}} gab.com Text An Empirical Analysis of Ontology Reuse in BioPortal JO: J Biomed Inform http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28583809 #FOAvip Biomedical ontologies often reuse content (i.e., classes and properties) from other ontologies. Content reuse enables a consistent representation of a domain and reusing content can save an ontology author significant time and effort. Prior studies have investigated the existence of reused terms among the ontologies in the NCBO BioPortal, but as of yet there has not been a study investigating how the ontologies in BioPortal utilize reused content in the modeling of their own content. In this study we investigate how 355 ontologies hosted in the NCBO BioPortal reuse content from other ontologies for the purposes of creating new ontology content. We identified 197 ontologies that reuse content. Among these ontologies, 108 utilize reused classes in the modeling of their own classes and 116 utilize reused properties in class restrictions. Current utilization of reuse and quality issues related to reuse are discussed. Twit Text FOAVip An Empirical Analysis of Ontology Reuse in BioPortal ????J Biomed Inform http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28583809 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28583809 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28583809}}</ref> An Empirical Analysis of Ontology Reuse in BioPortal #MMPMID28583809 Ochs C; Perl Y; Geller J; Arabandi S; Tudorache T; Musen MA J Biomed Inform 2017[Jul]; 71 (ä): 165-77 PMID28583809show ga Biomedical ontologies often reuse content (i.e., classes and properties) from other ontologies. Content reuse enables a consistent representation of a domain and reusing content can save an ontology author significant time and effort. Prior studies have investigated the existence of reused terms among the ontologies in the NCBO BioPortal, but as of yet there has not been a study investigating how the ontologies in BioPortal utilize reused content in the modeling of their own content. In this study we investigate how 355 ontologies hosted in the NCBO BioPortal reuse content from other ontologies for the purposes of creating new ontology content. We identified 197 ontologies that reuse content. Among these ontologies, 108 utilize reused classes in the modeling of their own classes and 116 utilize reused properties in class restrictions. Current utilization of reuse and quality issues related to reuse are discussed. äAn Empirical Analysis of Ontology Reuse in BioPortal (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing