Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1073/pnas.1609996114 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1073/pnas.1609996114 C5488913!5488913!28584129     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Proc+Natl+Acad+Sci+U+S+A 2017 ; 114 (25): 6498-503 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28584129|t=2017. Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research |pdf=|usr=}}{{28584129}} gab.com Text Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research JO: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28584129 #FOAvip Innovative fundamental basic science research is traditionally done by young people. This makes the steady fall in the number of younger US basic scientists a serious concern. Our analysis suggests that this happened mainly due to a bias against younger applicants, with more money going to older principal investigators (PIs). We also find a large number of postdoctoral scholars and research associates, a rapid rise in number of PIs over 71, and a steady shift of NIH funds away from R01 grants. NIH is attempting to deal with some of these issues. Twit Text FOAVip Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research ????Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28584129 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28584129 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28584129}}</ref> Future of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research #MMPMID28584129 Levitt M; Levitt JM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017[Jun]; 114 (25): 6498-503 PMID28584129show ga Innovative fundamental basic science research is traditionally done by young people. This makes the steady fall in the number of younger US basic scientists a serious concern. Our analysis suggests that this happened mainly due to a bias against younger applicants, with more money going to older principal investigators (PIs). We also find a large number of postdoctoral scholars and research associates, a rapid rise in number of PIs over 71, and a steady shift of NIH funds away from R01 grants. NIH is attempting to deal with some of these issues. äFuture of fundamental discovery in US biomedical research (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing