Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3390/nano7060142 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3390/nano7060142 C5485789!5485789!28594385     free     free     free       Nanomaterials+(Basel) 2017 ; 7 (6): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28594385|t=2017. Review of SERS Substrates for Chemical Sensing |pdf=|usr=}}{{28594385}} gab.com Text Review of SERS Substrates for Chemical Sensing JO: Nanomaterials (Basel) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28594385 #FOAvip The SERS effect was initially discovered in the 1970s. Early research focused on understanding the phenomenon and increasing enhancement to achieve single molecule detection. From the mid-1980s to early 1990s, research started to move away from obtaining a fundamental understanding of the phenomenon to the exploration of analytical applications. At the same time, significant developments occurred in the field of photonics that led to the advent of inexpensive, robust, compact, field-deployable Raman systems. The 1990s also saw rapid development in nanoscience. This convergence of technologies (photonics and nanoscience) has led to accelerated development of SERS substrates to detect a wide range of chemical and biological analytes. It would be a monumental task to discuss all the different kinds of SERS substrates that have been explored. Likewise, it would be impossible to discuss the use of SERS for both chemical and biological detection. Instead, a review of the most common metallic (Ag, Cu, and Au) SERS substrates for chemical detection only is discussed, as well as SERS substrates that are commercially available. Other issues with SERS for chemical detection have been selectivity, reversibility, and reusability of the substrates. How these issues have been addressed is also discussed in this review. Twit Text FOAVip Review of SERS Substrates for Chemical Sensing ????Nanomaterials (Basel) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28594385 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28594385 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28594385}}</ref> Review of SERS Substrates for Chemical Sensing #MMPMID28594385 Mosier-Boss PA Nanomaterials (Basel) 2017[Jun]; 7 (6): ä PMID28594385show ga The SERS effect was initially discovered in the 1970s. Early research focused on understanding the phenomenon and increasing enhancement to achieve single molecule detection. From the mid-1980s to early 1990s, research started to move away from obtaining a fundamental understanding of the phenomenon to the exploration of analytical applications. At the same time, significant developments occurred in the field of photonics that led to the advent of inexpensive, robust, compact, field-deployable Raman systems. The 1990s also saw rapid development in nanoscience. This convergence of technologies (photonics and nanoscience) has led to accelerated development of SERS substrates to detect a wide range of chemical and biological analytes. It would be a monumental task to discuss all the different kinds of SERS substrates that have been explored. Likewise, it would be impossible to discuss the use of SERS for both chemical and biological detection. Instead, a review of the most common metallic (Ag, Cu, and Au) SERS substrates for chemical detection only is discussed, as well as SERS substrates that are commercially available. Other issues with SERS for chemical detection have been selectivity, reversibility, and reusability of the substrates. How these issues have been addressed is also discussed in this review. äReview of SERS Substrates for Chemical Sensing (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing