Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1097/MD.0000000000007163 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1097/MD.0000000000007163 C5478335!5478335 !28614250     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 217.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 251.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 251.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 251.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 251.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 251.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\28614250 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Medicine+(Baltimore) 2017 ; 96 (24 ): e7163 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28614250 |t=2017. The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis |pdf=|usr=}}{{28614250 }} gab.com Text The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis JO: Medicine (Baltimore) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28614250 #FOAvip BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates of heterotopic ossification (HO) following cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) varied widely in previous studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize its point prevalence. METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify studies that reported prevalence of HO. Definitions of HO and severe HO were based on McAfee grading system. Random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. We conducted subgroup analyses according to the different length of follow-up time, and performed univariate metaregression analyses to explore the effects of potential variables on the overall prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were included in this study. The pooled data showed that the prevalence of HO after cervical ADR within the 1 to 2 years, 2 to 5 years, and 5 to10 years of follow-up was 38.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2%-46.5%), 52.6% (95% CI, 43.1%-61.9%), and 53.6% (95% CI, 40.0%-66.7%), respectively, while the prevalence of severe HO was 10.9% (95% CI, 9.0%-13.2%), 22.2% (95% CI, 15.5%-30.7%), and 47.5% (95% CI, 30.0%-65.8%), respectively. Follow-up time was positively associated with the prevalence of severe HO (P?<?.01), and the 1-month growth of mean follow-up went with 0.63% increase of severe HO. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis reported data on the prevalence of HO and severe HO after cervical ADR, and provided information on its process of development. These should be useful to enable surgeons and patients to gain a better understanding of HO after cervical ADR. Twit Text FOAVip The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis ????Medicine (Baltimore) http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28614250 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28614250 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28614250 }}</ref> The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis #MMPMID28614250 Kong L ; Ma Q ; Meng F ; Cao J ; Yu K ; Shen Y Medicine (Baltimore) 2017[Jun]; 96 (24 ): e7163 PMID28614250 show ga BACKGROUND: Prevalence estimates of heterotopic ossification (HO) following cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) varied widely in previous studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize its point prevalence. METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify studies that reported prevalence of HO. Definitions of HO and severe HO were based on McAfee grading system. Random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. We conducted subgroup analyses according to the different length of follow-up time, and performed univariate metaregression analyses to explore the effects of potential variables on the overall prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were included in this study. The pooled data showed that the prevalence of HO after cervical ADR within the 1 to 2 years, 2 to 5 years, and 5 to10 years of follow-up was 38.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2%-46.5%), 52.6% (95% CI, 43.1%-61.9%), and 53.6% (95% CI, 40.0%-66.7%), respectively, while the prevalence of severe HO was 10.9% (95% CI, 9.0%-13.2%), 22.2% (95% CI, 15.5%-30.7%), and 47.5% (95% CI, 30.0%-65.8%), respectively. Follow-up time was positively associated with the prevalence of severe HO (P? |*Total Disc Replacement/adverse effects [MESH] |Cervical Vertebrae/*surgery [MESH] |Humans [MESH] |Ossification, Heterotopic/*epidemiology/etiology [MESH] |Postoperative Complications/*epidemiology [MESH]The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing