Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s12178-017-9402-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s12178-017-9402-y C5435633!5435633!28316056     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=28316056&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       Curr+Rev+Musculoskelet+Med 2017 ; 10 (2): 199-206 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28316056|t=2017. Temporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures |pdf=|usr=}}{{28316056}} gab.com Text Temporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures JO: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28316056 #FOAvip Purpose of Review: We will review the recent literature concerning the necessity of supplemental fusion to spinal instrumentation and discuss if temporal spinal fixation is a viable option for the treatment of unstable spine fractures. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques offer an alternative approach to traditional open stabilization for unstable spine fractures. The use of minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages concerning operative morbidly; fusion is not utilized and instrumentation can be removed in a delayed fashion. Recent Findings: There are limited differences in amount of correction loss over time, and multiple studies report equivocal to superior results in patient?s functional outcomes when comparing temporary internal stabilization to long segment instrumentation with fusion. Removal of implants can restore segmental motion. Summary: Review of the literature demonstrates that temporary internal stabilization for unstable fractures is a viable option. Close clinical and radiographic follow-up is recommended to avoid delayed spinal deformity. Twit Text FOAVip Temporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures ????Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28316056 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28316056 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28316056}}</ref> Temporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures #MMPMID28316056 Danison AP; Lee DJ; Panchal RR Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017[Jun]; 10 (2): 199-206 PMID28316056show ga Purpose of Review: We will review the recent literature concerning the necessity of supplemental fusion to spinal instrumentation and discuss if temporal spinal fixation is a viable option for the treatment of unstable spine fractures. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques offer an alternative approach to traditional open stabilization for unstable spine fractures. The use of minimally invasive surgery offers many advantages concerning operative morbidly; fusion is not utilized and instrumentation can be removed in a delayed fashion. Recent Findings: There are limited differences in amount of correction loss over time, and multiple studies report equivocal to superior results in patient?s functional outcomes when comparing temporary internal stabilization to long segment instrumentation with fusion. Removal of implants can restore segmental motion. Summary: Review of the literature demonstrates that temporary internal stabilization for unstable fractures is a viable option. Close clinical and radiographic follow-up is recommended to avoid delayed spinal deformity. äTemporary stabilization of unstable spine fractures (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing