Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1007/s12178-017-9401-z C5435632!5435632!28332140     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Curr+Rev+Musculoskelet+Med 2017 ; 10 (2): 189-98 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28332140|t=2017. Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review |pdf=|usr=}}{{28332140}} gab.com Text Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation A review JO: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28332140 #FOAvip Purpose of review: Interspinous process devices (IPDs) are used in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The purpose of this review is to compare the first generation with the next-generation devices in terms of complications, device failure, reoperation rates, symptom relief, and outcome. Recent findings: Thirty-seven studies were included from 2011 to 2016. Device failure occurred at a mean of 3.7%, with a lower tendency to happen with next-generation IPDs. Reoperations occurred at a lower rate with the next-generation devices, with a mean follow up of 24 months (3.7% vs. 11.1%). The clinical outcome is not influenced by the type of IPD. Summary: The long-term functionality of these devices is questionable, with radiologic changes and recurrence of symptoms often seen by 2 years following implantation. Next-generation devices do not appear to be subject to the same ?bounce back? effect of symptom re-emergence after several years. Twit Text FOAVip Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation A review ????Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28332140 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28332140 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28332140}}</ref> Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review #MMPMID28332140 Pintauro M; Duffy A; Vahedi P; Rymarczuk G; Heller J Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017[Jun]; 10 (2): 189-98 PMID28332140show ga Purpose of review: Interspinous process devices (IPDs) are used in the surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The purpose of this review is to compare the first generation with the next-generation devices in terms of complications, device failure, reoperation rates, symptom relief, and outcome. Recent findings: Thirty-seven studies were included from 2011 to 2016. Device failure occurred at a mean of 3.7%, with a lower tendency to happen with next-generation IPDs. Reoperations occurred at a lower rate with the next-generation devices, with a mean follow up of 24 months (3.7% vs. 11.1%). The clinical outcome is not influenced by the type of IPD. Summary: The long-term functionality of these devices is questionable, with radiologic changes and recurrence of symptoms often seen by 2 years following implantation. Next-generation devices do not appear to be subject to the same ?bounce back? effect of symptom re-emergence after several years. äInterspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last gener(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing