Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.4103/sni.sni_277_16 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.4103/sni.sni_277_16 C5421200!5421200!28540134     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Surg+Neurol+Int 2017 ; 8 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28540134|t=2017. Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery |pdf=|usr=}}{{28540134}} gab.com Text Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery JO: Surg Neurol Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28540134 #FOAvip Background:: We assess Google Glass (?Glass?) in improving postoperative review (?debriefing?) and augmenting education in Neurological Surgery at a tertiary academic medical center. Methods:: This was a prospective study. Participants were patients of Neurological Surgery physicians at a Tertiary Care Level 1 Academic Trauma Center. Resident physicians received a pre-questionnaire immediately following surgery. Next, the resident and attending physicians debriefed by reviewing the Glass operative recording. Then, residents completed a 4-part post-questionnaire. Questions 1?3 assessed: (1) the residents? comfort level with the procedure, (2) the quality of education provided by their superiors, and (3) their comfort level in repeating the operation. Question 4 assessed: (4) the perceived benefit of debriefing using Glass. Results:: Twelve surveys were collected. Scores were based on a 5-point Likert scale, with a higher score corresponding to a more positive response. For Questions 1?3, the average pre- and post-questionnaire scores were 3.75 and 4.42, respectively (P <.05). For Question 4, the average post-questionnaire score was 4.63, suggesting that postoperative Glass review improved their technical understanding of the procedure. Conclusions:: Glass significantly improved neurosurgery residents? comfort level and quality of training, and provided a high fidelity, reliable, and modifiable tool that enhanced residents? understanding, expertise, and educational experience. Of note, certain limitations such as variable battery life, variable image quality, and subpar compatibility with surgeon loupes must still be overcome for Glass to become a realistic addition to neurosurgical education. Twit Text FOAVip Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery ????Surg Neurol Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28540134 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28540134 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28540134}}</ref> Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery #MMPMID28540134 Sahyouni R; Moshtaghi O; Tran DK; Kaloostian S; Rajaii R; Bustillo D; Chen JW Surg Neurol Int 2017[]; 8 (ä): ä PMID28540134show ga Background:: We assess Google Glass (?Glass?) in improving postoperative review (?debriefing?) and augmenting education in Neurological Surgery at a tertiary academic medical center. Methods:: This was a prospective study. Participants were patients of Neurological Surgery physicians at a Tertiary Care Level 1 Academic Trauma Center. Resident physicians received a pre-questionnaire immediately following surgery. Next, the resident and attending physicians debriefed by reviewing the Glass operative recording. Then, residents completed a 4-part post-questionnaire. Questions 1?3 assessed: (1) the residents? comfort level with the procedure, (2) the quality of education provided by their superiors, and (3) their comfort level in repeating the operation. Question 4 assessed: (4) the perceived benefit of debriefing using Glass. Results:: Twelve surveys were collected. Scores were based on a 5-point Likert scale, with a higher score corresponding to a more positive response. For Questions 1?3, the average pre- and post-questionnaire scores were 3.75 and 4.42, respectively (P <.05). For Question 4, the average post-questionnaire score was 4.63, suggesting that postoperative Glass review improved their technical understanding of the procedure. Conclusions:: Glass significantly improved neurosurgery residents? comfort level and quality of training, and provided a high fidelity, reliable, and modifiable tool that enhanced residents? understanding, expertise, and educational experience. Of note, certain limitations such as variable battery life, variable image quality, and subpar compatibility with surgeon loupes must still be overcome for Glass to become a realistic addition to neurosurgical education. äAssessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing