Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.21037/jtd.2017.03.48 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.21037/jtd.2017.03.48 C5393997!5393997!28449530     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       J+Thorac+Dis 2017 ; 9 (3): E310-2 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28449530|t=2017. Quality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first |pdf=|usr=}}{{28449530}} gab.com Text Quality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first JO: J Thorac Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28449530 #FOAvip Professionals in the ICU, like nurses and doctors, are constantly working on quality improvement by developing protocols and monitoring the implementation with indicators. Protocols and quality indicators are usually based on evidence. Studies on quality improvement often measure the effect of protocols after implementation but frequently cannot replicate the results of the previously performed RCTs in clinical practice. Amongst other reasons, this is due to the selection of patients that are included in RCTs. Several quality improvement initiatives can be studied together in daily practice as a bundle with a multifaceted approach. A recent study is discussed that shows that this approach can only give significant results when the interventions are focussed on the main processes that are related to the chosen outcome measures. Several different reasons are apparently the cause that quality improvement studies often reveal negative results. Quality improvement studies need to have a rigorous design and well-chosen endpoints. Twit Text FOAVip Quality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first ????J Thorac Dis http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28449530 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28449530 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28449530}}</ref> Quality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first #MMPMID28449530 van der Voort PHJ J Thorac Dis 2017[Mar]; 9 (3): E310-2 PMID28449530show ga Professionals in the ICU, like nurses and doctors, are constantly working on quality improvement by developing protocols and monitoring the implementation with indicators. Protocols and quality indicators are usually based on evidence. Studies on quality improvement often measure the effect of protocols after implementation but frequently cannot replicate the results of the previously performed RCTs in clinical practice. Amongst other reasons, this is due to the selection of patients that are included in RCTs. Several quality improvement initiatives can be studied together in daily practice as a bundle with a multifaceted approach. A recent study is discussed that shows that this approach can only give significant results when the interventions are focussed on the main processes that are related to the chosen outcome measures. Several different reasons are apparently the cause that quality improvement studies often reveal negative results. Quality improvement studies need to have a rigorous design and well-chosen endpoints. äQuality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing