Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5152/eurasianjmed.2017.15289 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2017.15289 C5389501!5389501 !28416924     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 247.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Warning: imagejpeg(C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\phplern\28416924 .jpg): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 117       Eurasian+J+Med 2017 ; 49 (1 ): 7-11 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28416924 |t=2017. Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades |pdf=|usr=}}{{28416924 }} gab.com Text Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades JO: Eurasian J Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28416924 #FOAvip OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of anti-rotation trochanteric nails (ATNs) with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 165 intertrochanteric fractures were treated between January 2007 and January 2010. One hundred forty patients were included. The operation time, amount of blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, and length of hospitalization were recorded. The radiological position of the implant, quality of fracture reduction, and tip-apex distance were evaluated, and the postoperative complications as well as functional condition of the patients were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ATN and PFNA groups for the presence of general complications, length of hospitalization, and functional capacity. The mean operation time, blood loss amount, and fluoroscopy screening time were more in the ATN group than in the PFNA group. Reoperation was needed for nine and two patients in the ATN and PFNA groups, respectively, because of implant-related complications. CONCLUSION: Both ATNs and PFNA were suitable for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures, but the risk of complication occurrence and need for reoperation were found to be higher in patients who were treated with ATNs. Twit Text FOAVip Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades ????Eurasian J Med http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28416924 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28416924 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28416924 }}</ref> Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades #MMPMID28416924 Kumbaraci M ; Karapinar L ; Turgut A Eurasian J Med 2017[Feb]; 49 (1 ): 7-11 PMID28416924 show ga OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the radiological and functional outcomes of anti-rotation trochanteric nails (ATNs) with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 165 intertrochanteric fractures were treated between January 2007 and January 2010. One hundred forty patients were included. The operation time, amount of blood loss, fluoroscopy screening time, and length of hospitalization were recorded. The radiological position of the implant, quality of fracture reduction, and tip-apex distance were evaluated, and the postoperative complications as well as functional condition of the patients were assessed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ATN and PFNA groups for the presence of general complications, length of hospitalization, and functional capacity. The mean operation time, blood loss amount, and fluoroscopy screening time were more in the ATN group than in the PFNA group. Reoperation was needed for nine and two patients in the ATN and PFNA groups, respectively, because of implant-related complications. CONCLUSION: Both ATNs and PFNA were suitable for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures, but the risk of complication occurrence and need for reoperation were found to be higher in patients who were treated with ATNs. äComparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing