Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.21037/acs.2017.03.07 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.21037/acs.2017.03.07 C5387143!5387143!28447002     free     free     free       Ann+Cardiothorac+Surg 2017 ; 6 (2): 137-43 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28447002|t=2017. Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement |pdf=|usr=}}{{28447002}} gab.com Text Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement JO: Ann Cardiothorac Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28447002 #FOAvip Replacement of the native esophagus after esophagectomy is a problem that has challenged surgeons for over a century. Not only must the conduit be long enough to bridge the distance between the cervical esophagus and the abdomen, it must also have a reliable vascular supply and be sufficiently functional to allow for deglutition. The stomach, jejunum, and colon (right, left or transverse) have all been proposed as potential solutions. The stomach has gained favor for its length, reliable vascular supply and need for only a single anastomosis. However, there are times when the stomach is unavailable for use as a conduit. It is in these instances that an esophageal surgeon must have an alternative conduit in their armamentarium. In this paper, we will briefly discuss the technical aspects of jejunal and colonic interposition. We will review the recent literature with a focus on early and late outcomes. The advantages and disadvantages of both options will be reviewed. Twit Text FOAVip Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement ????Ann Cardiothorac Surg http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28447002 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28447002 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28447002}}</ref> Alternative conduits for esophageal replacement #MMPMID28447002 Bakshi A; Sugarbaker DJ; Burt BM Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2017[Mar]; 6 (2): 137-43 PMID28447002show ga Replacement of the native esophagus after esophagectomy is a problem that has challenged surgeons for over a century. Not only must the conduit be long enough to bridge the distance between the cervical esophagus and the abdomen, it must also have a reliable vascular supply and be sufficiently functional to allow for deglutition. The stomach, jejunum, and colon (right, left or transverse) have all been proposed as potential solutions. The stomach has gained favor for its length, reliable vascular supply and need for only a single anastomosis. However, there are times when the stomach is unavailable for use as a conduit. It is in these instances that an esophageal surgeon must have an alternative conduit in their armamentarium. In this paper, we will briefly discuss the technical aspects of jejunal and colonic interposition. We will review the recent literature with a focus on early and late outcomes. The advantages and disadvantages of both options will be reviewed. äAlternative conduits for esophageal replacement (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing