Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/s-0037-1599242 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/s-0037-1599242 C5375706!5375706!28382129     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=28382129&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Int+Arch+Otorhinolaryngol 2017 ; 21 (2): 184-90 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28382129|t=2017. Labyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous Symptoms |pdf=|usr=}}{{28382129}} gab.com Text Labyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous Symptoms JO: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382129 #FOAvip Introduction?Labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy are considered the surgical procedures with the highest possibility of controlling medically untreatable incapacitating vertigo. Ironically, after 100 years of the introduction of both transmastoid labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy, the choice of which procedure to use rests primarily on the evaluation of the hearing and of the surgical morbidity.Objective?To review surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy for the treatment of incapacitating vestibular disorders.Data Sources?PubMed, MD consult and Ovid-SP databases.Data Synthesis?In this review we describe and compare surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy. A contrast between surgical and chemical labyrinthectomy is also examined. Proper candidate selection, success in vertigo control and complication rates are discussed on the basis of a literature review.Conclusions?Vestibular nerve section and labyrinthectomy achieve high and comparable rates of vertigo control. Even though vestibular neurectomy is considered a hearing sparing surgery, since it is an intradural procedure, it carries a greater risk of complications than transmastoid labyrinthectomy. Furthermore, since many patients whose hearing is preserved with vestibular nerve section may ultimately lose that hearing, the long-term value of hearing preservation is not well established. Although the combination of both procedures, in the form of a translabyrinthine vestibular nerve section, is the most certain way to ablate vestibular function for patients with no useful hearing and disabling vertigo, some advocate for transmastoid labyrinthectomy alone, considering that avoiding opening the subarachnoid space minimizes the possible intracranial complications. Chemical labyrinthectomy may be considered a safer alternative, but the risks of hearing loss when hearing preservation is desired are also high. Twit Text FOAVip Labyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous Symptoms ????Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382129 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382129 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28382129}}</ref> Labyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous Symptoms #MMPMID28382129 Alarcón AV; Hidalgo LOV; Arévalo RJ; Diaz MP Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017[Apr]; 21 (2): 184-90 PMID28382129show ga Introduction?Labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy are considered the surgical procedures with the highest possibility of controlling medically untreatable incapacitating vertigo. Ironically, after 100 years of the introduction of both transmastoid labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy, the choice of which procedure to use rests primarily on the evaluation of the hearing and of the surgical morbidity.Objective?To review surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy for the treatment of incapacitating vestibular disorders.Data Sources?PubMed, MD consult and Ovid-SP databases.Data Synthesis?In this review we describe and compare surgical labyrinthectomy and vestibular neurectomy. A contrast between surgical and chemical labyrinthectomy is also examined. Proper candidate selection, success in vertigo control and complication rates are discussed on the basis of a literature review.Conclusions?Vestibular nerve section and labyrinthectomy achieve high and comparable rates of vertigo control. Even though vestibular neurectomy is considered a hearing sparing surgery, since it is an intradural procedure, it carries a greater risk of complications than transmastoid labyrinthectomy. Furthermore, since many patients whose hearing is preserved with vestibular nerve section may ultimately lose that hearing, the long-term value of hearing preservation is not well established. Although the combination of both procedures, in the form of a translabyrinthine vestibular nerve section, is the most certain way to ablate vestibular function for patients with no useful hearing and disabling vertigo, some advocate for transmastoid labyrinthectomy alone, considering that avoiding opening the subarachnoid space minimizes the possible intracranial complications. Chemical labyrinthectomy may be considered a safer alternative, but the risks of hearing loss when hearing preservation is desired are also high. äLabyrinthectomy and Vestibular Neurectomy for Intractable Vertiginous (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing