Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1055/s-0037-1599785 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1055/s-0037-1599785 C5375705!5375705!28382131     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 213.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Int+Arch+Otorhinolaryngol 2017 ; 21 (2): 195-8 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28382131|t=2017. Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome ? Diagnosis and Surgical Management |pdf=|usr=}}{{28382131}} gab.com Text Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome Diagnosis and Surgical Management JO: Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382131 #FOAvip Introduction?Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony, hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus and hearing loss. When symptoms are mild, they are usually managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be needed for patients with debilitating symptoms.Objective?The aim of this manuscript is to review the different surgical techniques used to repair the superior semicircular canal dehiscence.Data Sources?PubMed and Ovid-SP databases.Data Synthesis?The different approaches are described and discussed, as well as their limitations. We also review the advantages and disadvantages of the plugging, capping and resurfacing techniques to repair the dehiscence.Conclusions?Each of the surgical approaches has advantages and disadvantages. The middle fossa approach gives a better view of the dehiscence, but comes with a higher morbidity than the transmastoid approach. Endoscopic assistance may be advantageous during the middle cranial fossa approach for better visualization. The plugging and capping techniques are associated with higher success rates than resurfacing, with no added risk of hearing loss. Twit Text FOAVip Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome Diagnosis and Surgical Management ????Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382131 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28382131 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28382131}}</ref> Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome ? Diagnosis and Surgical Management #MMPMID28382131 Palma Diaz M; Cisneros Lesser JC; Vega Alarcón A Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017[Apr]; 21 (2): 195-8 PMID28382131show ga Introduction?Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was described by Minor et al in 1998. It is a troublesome syndrome that results in vertigo and oscillopsia induced by loud sounds or changes in the pressure of the external auditory canal or middle ear. Patients may present with autophony, hyperacusis, pulsatile tinnitus and hearing loss. When symptoms are mild, they are usually managed conservatively, but surgical intervention may be needed for patients with debilitating symptoms.Objective?The aim of this manuscript is to review the different surgical techniques used to repair the superior semicircular canal dehiscence.Data Sources?PubMed and Ovid-SP databases.Data Synthesis?The different approaches are described and discussed, as well as their limitations. We also review the advantages and disadvantages of the plugging, capping and resurfacing techniques to repair the dehiscence.Conclusions?Each of the surgical approaches has advantages and disadvantages. The middle fossa approach gives a better view of the dehiscence, but comes with a higher morbidity than the transmastoid approach. Endoscopic assistance may be advantageous during the middle cranial fossa approach for better visualization. The plugging and capping techniques are associated with higher success rates than resurfacing, with no added risk of hearing loss. äSuperior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome ? Diagnosis and Surgic(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing