Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.5758/vsi.2017.33.1.22 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.5758/vsi.2017.33.1.22 C5374956!5374956!28377908     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 211.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Vasc+Specialist+Int 2017 ; 33 (1): 22-6 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28377908|t=2017. The Usefulness of Duplex Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Access Selection |pdf=|usr=}}{{28377908}} gab.com Text The Usefulness of Duplex Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Access Selection JO: Vasc Specialist Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28377908 #FOAvip Purpose: A native vessel is preferable to an artificial graft for dialysis access. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is noninvasive, cost-effective modality to evaluate the vessels for dialysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of utilization of native vessels after preoperative imaging with DUS and contrast venography (CV). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who received an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) between June 2006 and July 2010. Patients were classified into 3 groups. In group 1, CV was used to evaluate the vessel. Both DUS and CV were used in group 2. In group 3, only DUS was used. The frequency of utilization of a native vessel was analyzed in each group. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: During the study period, 173 patients received an AVF or AVG. Eighty-nine patients were male. The mean age was 60.6±14.6 years. A native vessel was used in 56/81 patients (69.1%) and 74/81 patients (91.4%) in groups 1 and 3, respectively (P<0.001). In group 2, all patients underwent access procedures using native vessels. AVG was initially planned for 2 patients in group 2 after vessel evaluation using CV, but a native vessel was successfully used because DUS identified optimal vessels for AVF. The 1-year primary patency rate was similar in 3 groups. Conclusion: Preoperative DUS is safe and easy to use for vessel evaluation, and can be used as a primary imaging modality for creation of access. Twit Text FOAVip The Usefulness of Duplex Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Access Selection ????Vasc Specialist Int http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28377908 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28377908 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28377908}}</ref> The Usefulness of Duplex Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Access Selection #MMPMID28377908 Choi JW; Joh JH; Park HC Vasc Specialist Int 2017[Mar]; 33 (1): 22-6 PMID28377908show ga Purpose: A native vessel is preferable to an artificial graft for dialysis access. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) is noninvasive, cost-effective modality to evaluate the vessels for dialysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of utilization of native vessels after preoperative imaging with DUS and contrast venography (CV). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who received an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) between June 2006 and July 2010. Patients were classified into 3 groups. In group 1, CV was used to evaluate the vessel. Both DUS and CV were used in group 2. In group 3, only DUS was used. The frequency of utilization of a native vessel was analyzed in each group. The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results: During the study period, 173 patients received an AVF or AVG. Eighty-nine patients were male. The mean age was 60.6±14.6 years. A native vessel was used in 56/81 patients (69.1%) and 74/81 patients (91.4%) in groups 1 and 3, respectively (P<0.001). In group 2, all patients underwent access procedures using native vessels. AVG was initially planned for 2 patients in group 2 after vessel evaluation using CV, but a native vessel was successfully used because DUS identified optimal vessels for AVF. The 1-year primary patency rate was similar in 3 groups. Conclusion: Preoperative DUS is safe and easy to use for vessel evaluation, and can be used as a primary imaging modality for creation of access. äThe Usefulness of Duplex Ultrasound for Hemodialysis Access Selection (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing