Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012212 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012212 C5372122!5372122!28336734     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       BMJ+Open 2017 ; 7 (3): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28336734|t=2017. Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study |pdf=|usr=}}{{28336734}} gab.com Text Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study JO: BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28336734 #FOAvip Objective: To examine the length of time between receiving funding and publishing the protocol and main paper for randomised controlled trials. Design: An observational study using survival analysis. Setting: Publicly funded health and medical research in Australia. Participants: Randomised controlled trials funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia between 2008 and 2010. Main outcome measures: Time from funding to the protocol paper and main results paper. Multiple variable survival models examining whether study characteristics predicted publication times. Results: We found 77 studies with a total funding of $A59 million. The median time to publication of the protocol paper was 6.4?years after funding (95% CI 4.1 to 8.1). The proportion with a published protocol paper 8?years after funding was 0.61 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.74). The median time to publication of the main results paper was 7.1?years after funding (95% CI 6.3 to 7.6). The proportion with a published main results paper 8?years after funding was 0.72 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.87). The HRs for how study characteristics might influence timing were generally close to one with narrow CIs, the notable exception was that a longer study length lengthened the time to the main paper (HR=0.62 per extra study year, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89). Conclusions: Despite the widespread registration of clinical trials, there remain serious concerns of trial results not being published or being published with a long delay. We have found that these same concerns apply to protocol papers, which should be publishable soon after funding. Funding agencies could set a target of publishing the protocol paper within 18?months of funding. Twit Text FOAVip Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study ????BMJ Open http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28336734 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28336734 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28336734}}</ref> Time to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: an observational study #MMPMID28336734 Strand LB; Clarke P; Graves N; Barnett AG BMJ Open 2017[]; 7 (3): ä PMID28336734show ga Objective: To examine the length of time between receiving funding and publishing the protocol and main paper for randomised controlled trials. Design: An observational study using survival analysis. Setting: Publicly funded health and medical research in Australia. Participants: Randomised controlled trials funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia between 2008 and 2010. Main outcome measures: Time from funding to the protocol paper and main results paper. Multiple variable survival models examining whether study characteristics predicted publication times. Results: We found 77 studies with a total funding of $A59 million. The median time to publication of the protocol paper was 6.4?years after funding (95% CI 4.1 to 8.1). The proportion with a published protocol paper 8?years after funding was 0.61 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.74). The median time to publication of the main results paper was 7.1?years after funding (95% CI 6.3 to 7.6). The proportion with a published main results paper 8?years after funding was 0.72 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.87). The HRs for how study characteristics might influence timing were generally close to one with narrow CIs, the notable exception was that a longer study length lengthened the time to the main paper (HR=0.62 per extra study year, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89). Conclusions: Despite the widespread registration of clinical trials, there remain serious concerns of trial results not being published or being published with a long delay. We have found that these same concerns apply to protocol papers, which should be publishable soon after funding. Funding agencies could set a target of publishing the protocol paper within 18?months of funding. äTime to publication for publicly funded clinical trials in Australia: (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing