Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1111/cts.12188 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1111/cts.12188 C5350913!5350913!25041546     free     free     free       Clin+Transl+Sci 2015 ; 8 (1): 77-81 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=25041546|t=2015. Scoping Meta?Review: Introducing a New Methodology |pdf=|usr=}}{{25041546}} gab.com Text Scoping Meta Review: Introducing a New Methodology JO: Clin Transl Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25041546 #FOAvip For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the ?scoping meta?review? (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta?review to establish an evidence?based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high?level evidence provided by systematic reviews. Twit Text FOAVip Scoping Meta Review: Introducing a New Methodology ????Clin Transl Sci http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25041546 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=25041546 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|25041546}}</ref> Scoping Meta?Review: Introducing a New Methodology #MMPMID25041546 Sarrami?Foroushani P; Travaglia J; Debono D; Clay?Williams R; Braithwaite J Clin Transl Sci 2015[Feb]; 8 (1): 77-81 PMID25041546show ga For researchers, policymakers, and practitioners facing a new field, undertaking a systematic review can typically present a challenge due to the enormous number of relevant papers. A scoping review is a method suggested for addressing this dilemma; however, scoping reviews present their own challenges. This paper introduces the ?scoping meta?review? (SMR) for expanding current methodologies and is based on our experiences in mapping the field of consumer engagement in healthcare. During this process, we developed the novel SMR method. An SMR combines aspects of a scoping review and a meta?review to establish an evidence?based map of a field. Similar to a scoping review, an SMR offers a practical and flexible methodology. However, unlike in a traditional scoping review, only systematic reviews are included. Stages of the SMR include: undertaking a preliminary nonsystematic review; building a search strategy; interrogating academic literature databases; classifying and excluding studies based on titles and abstracts; saving the refined database of references; revising the search strategy; selecting and reviewing the full text papers; and thematically analyzing the selected texts and writing the report. The main benefit of an SMR is to map a new field based on high?level evidence provided by systematic reviews. äScoping Meta?Review: Introducing a New Methodology (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing