Landscape of protein?small ligand binding modes #MMPMID27327045
Kasahara K; Kinoshita K
Protein Sci 2016[Sep]; 25 (9): 1659-71 PMID27327045show ga
Elucidating the mechanisms of specific small?molecule (ligand) recognition by proteins is a long?standing conundrum. While the structures of these molecules, proteins and ligands, have been extensively studied, protein?ligand interactions, or binding modes, have not been comprehensively analyzed. Although methods for assessing similarities of binding site structures have been extensively developed, the methods for the computational treatment of binding modes have not been well established. Here, we developed a computational method for encoding the information about binding modes as graphs, and assessing their similarities. An all?against?all comparison of 20,040 protein?ligand complexes provided the landscape of the protein?ligand binding modes and its relationships with protein? and chemical spaces. While similar proteins in the same SCOP Family tend to bind relatively similar ligands with similar binding modes, the correlation between ligand and binding similarities was not very high (R2?=?0.443). We found many pairs with novel relationships, in which two evolutionally distant proteins recognize dissimilar ligands by similar binding modes (757,474 pairs out of 200,790,780 pairs were categorized into this relationship, in our dataset). In addition, there were an abundance of pairs of homologous proteins binding to similar ligands with different binding modes (68,217 pairs). Our results showed that many interesting relationships between protein?ligand complexes are still hidden in the structure database, and our new method for assessing binding mode similarities is effective to find them.
free
free
free
Protein+Sci 2016 ; 25 (9): 1659-71
