Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1186/s13089-017-0059-y http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1186/s13089-017-0059-y C5328906!5328906!28244009     free     free     free Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 209.6 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534 Deprecated: Implicit conversion from float 243.2 to int loses precision in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 534       Crit+Ultrasound+J 2017 ; 9 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28244009|t=2017. Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia |pdf=|usr=}}{{28244009}} gab.com Text Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia JO: Crit Ultrasound J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28244009 #FOAvip Background: Physicians are increasingly using point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) for diagnosing pneumonia, especially in critical situations as it represents relatively easy and immediately available tool. They also used it in many associated pathological conditions such as consolidation, pleural effusion, and interstitial syndrome with some reports of more accuracy than chest X-ray. This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed to estimate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia versus the standard chest radiological imaging. Methods and main results: A systematic literature search was conducted for all published studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of LUS against a reference Chest radiological exam (C X-ray or Chest computed Tomography CT scan), combined with clinical criteria for pneumonia in all age groups. Eligible studies were required to have a Chest X-ray and/or CT scan at the time of clinical evaluation. The authors extracted qualitative and quantitative information from eligible studies, and calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity and pooled positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR). Twenty studies containing 2513 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia were, respectively, as follows: Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of pneumonia by lung ultrasound were 0.85 (0.84?0.87) and 0.93 (0.92?0.95), respectively. Overall pooled positive and negative LRs were 11.05 (3.76?32.50) and 0.08 (0.04?0.15), pooled diagnostic Odds ratio was 173.64 (38.79?777.35), and area under the pooled ROC (AUC for SROC) was 0.978. Conclusion: Point of care lung ultrasound is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Considering being easy, readily availability, low cost, and free from radiological hazards, it can be considered as important diagnostic strategy in this condition. Twit Text FOAVip Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia ????Crit Ultrasound J http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28244009 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28244009 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28244009}}</ref> Systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus radiology in diagnosing of pneumonia #MMPMID28244009 Alzahrani SA; Al-Salamah MA; Al-Madani WH; Elbarbary MA Crit Ultrasound J 2017[]; 9 (ä): ä PMID28244009show ga Background: Physicians are increasingly using point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) for diagnosing pneumonia, especially in critical situations as it represents relatively easy and immediately available tool. They also used it in many associated pathological conditions such as consolidation, pleural effusion, and interstitial syndrome with some reports of more accuracy than chest X-ray. This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed to estimate the pooled diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia versus the standard chest radiological imaging. Methods and main results: A systematic literature search was conducted for all published studies comparing the diagnostic accuracy of LUS against a reference Chest radiological exam (C X-ray or Chest computed Tomography CT scan), combined with clinical criteria for pneumonia in all age groups. Eligible studies were required to have a Chest X-ray and/or CT scan at the time of clinical evaluation. The authors extracted qualitative and quantitative information from eligible studies, and calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity and pooled positive/negative likelihood ratios (LR). Twenty studies containing 2513 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of pneumonia were, respectively, as follows: Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of pneumonia by lung ultrasound were 0.85 (0.84?0.87) and 0.93 (0.92?0.95), respectively. Overall pooled positive and negative LRs were 11.05 (3.76?32.50) and 0.08 (0.04?0.15), pooled diagnostic Odds ratio was 173.64 (38.79?777.35), and area under the pooled ROC (AUC for SROC) was 0.978. Conclusion: Point of care lung ultrasound is an accurate tool for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Considering being easy, readily availability, low cost, and free from radiological hazards, it can be considered as important diagnostic strategy in this condition. äSystematic review and meta-analysis for the use of ultrasound versus r(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing