Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00221 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00221 C5319978!5319978!28275358     free     free     free       Front+Psychol 2017 ; 8 (ä): ä Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=28275358|t=2017. Cognitive Penetration and Attention |pdf=|usr=}}{{28275358}} gab.com Text Cognitive Penetration and Attention JO: Front Psychol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28275358 #FOAvip Zenon Pylyshyn argues that cognitively driven attentional effects do not amount to cognitive penetration of early vision because such effects occur either before or after early vision. Critics object that in fact such effects occur at all levels of perceptual processing. We argue that Pylyshyn?s claim is correct?but not for the reason he emphasizes. Even if his critics are correct that attentional effects are not external to early vision, these effects do not satisfy Pylyshyn?s requirements that the effects be direct and exhibit semantic coherence. In addition, we distinguish our defense from those found in recent work by Raftopoulos and by Firestone and Scholl, argue that attention should not be assimilated to expectation, and discuss alternative characterizations of cognitive penetrability, advocating a kind of pluralism. Twit Text FOAVip Cognitive Penetration and Attention ????Front Psychol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28275358 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=28275358 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|28275358}}</ref> Cognitive Penetration and Attention #MMPMID28275358 Gross S Front Psychol 2017[]; 8 (ä): ä PMID28275358show ga Zenon Pylyshyn argues that cognitively driven attentional effects do not amount to cognitive penetration of early vision because such effects occur either before or after early vision. Critics object that in fact such effects occur at all levels of perceptual processing. We argue that Pylyshyn?s claim is correct?but not for the reason he emphasizes. Even if his critics are correct that attentional effects are not external to early vision, these effects do not satisfy Pylyshyn?s requirements that the effects be direct and exhibit semantic coherence. In addition, we distinguish our defense from those found in recent work by Raftopoulos and by Firestone and Scholl, argue that attention should not be assimilated to expectation, and discuss alternative characterizations of cognitive penetrability, advocating a kind of pluralism. äCognitive Penetration and Attention (epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing