Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText.
Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>
A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences
Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

suck abstract from ncbi


10.1098/rsnr.2016.0042

http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1098/rsnr.2016.0042
suck pdf from google scholar
C5311899/?report=reader!5311899!31390404
unlimited free pdf from europmc31390404    free
PDF from PMC    free
html from PMC    free

suck abstract from ncbi

pmid31390404      Notes+Rec+R+Soc+Lond 2017 ; 71 (1): 91-107
Nephropedia Template TP

gab.com Text

Twit Text FOAVip

Twit Text #

English Wikipedia


  • Who cares about the history of science? #MMPMID31390404
  • Chang H
  • Notes Rec R Soc Lond 2017[Mar]; 71 (1): 91-107 PMID31390404show ga
  • The history of science has many functions. Historians should consider how their work contributes to various functions, going beyond a simple desire to understand the past correctly. There are both internal and external functions of the history of science in relation to science itself; I focus here on the internal, as they tend to be neglected these days. The internal functions can be divided into orthodox and complementary. The orthodox function is to assist with the understanding of the content and methods of science as it is now practised. The complementary function is to generate and improve scientific knowledge where current science itself fails to do so. Complementary functions of the history of science include the raising of critical awareness, and the recovery and extension of past scientific knowledge that has become forgotten or neglected. These complementary functions are illustrated with some concrete examples.
  • ä


  • DeepDyve
  • Pubget Overpricing
  • suck abstract from ncbi

    Linkout box