Use my Search Websuite to scan PubMed, PMCentral, Journal Hosts and Journal Archives, FullText. Kick-your-searchterm to multiple Engines kick-your-query now !>

A dictionary by aggregated review articles of nephrology, medicine and the life sciences Your one-stop-run pathway from word to the immediate pdf of peer-reviewed on-topic knowledge.

10.1177/2051415814555947 http://scihub22266oqcxt.onion/10.1177/2051415814555947 C5113811!5113811!27867520     free     free     free Warning: file_get_contents(https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=27867520&cmd=llinks): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests in C:\Inetpub\vhosts\kidney.de\httpdocs\pget.php on line 215       J+Clin+Urol 2015 ; 8 (3): 177-82 Nephropedia Template TP {{tp|p=27867520|t=2015. Consent information leaflets ? readable or unreadable?|pdf=|usr=}}{{27867520}} gab.com Text Consent information leaflets readable or unreadable JO: J Clin Urol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27867520 #FOAvip Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the readability of leaflets about urological procedures provided by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) to evaluate their suitability for providing information. Methods: Information leaflets were assessed using three measures of readability: Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) grade formulae. The scores were compared with national literacy statistics. Results: Relatively good readability was demonstrated using the Flesch Reading Ease (53.4?60.1) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (6.5?7.6) methods. However, the average SMOG index (14.0?15.0) for each category suggests that the majority of the leaflets are written above the reading level of an 18-year-old. Using national literacy statistics, at least 43% of the population will have significant difficultly understanding the majority of these leaflets. Conclusions: The results suggest that comprehension of the leaflets provided by the BAUS is likely to be poor. These leaflets may be used as an adjunct to discussion but it is essential to ensure that all the information necessary to make an informed decision has been conveyed in a way that can be understood by the patient. Twit Text FOAVip Consent information leaflets readable or unreadable ????J Clin Urol http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27867520 #FOAvip Twit Text # Free Paper on # # # # # LINK http://www.kidney.de/pget.php?&tw=1&pmid=27867520 #FOAvip English Wikipedia <ref>{{Cite pmid|27867520}}</ref> Consent information leaflets ? readable or unreadable? #MMPMID27867520 Graham C; Reynard JM; Turney BW J Clin Urol 2015[May]; 8 (3): 177-82 PMID27867520show ga Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the readability of leaflets about urological procedures provided by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) to evaluate their suitability for providing information. Methods: Information leaflets were assessed using three measures of readability: Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) grade formulae. The scores were compared with national literacy statistics. Results: Relatively good readability was demonstrated using the Flesch Reading Ease (53.4?60.1) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (6.5?7.6) methods. However, the average SMOG index (14.0?15.0) for each category suggests that the majority of the leaflets are written above the reading level of an 18-year-old. Using national literacy statistics, at least 43% of the population will have significant difficultly understanding the majority of these leaflets. Conclusions: The results suggest that comprehension of the leaflets provided by the BAUS is likely to be poor. These leaflets may be used as an adjunct to discussion but it is essential to ensure that all the information necessary to make an informed decision has been conveyed in a way that can be understood by the patient. äConsent information leaflets ? readable or unreadable?(epmc).pdf DeepDyve Pubget Overpricing